McCabe and The Memo

This speaks to my concern about what was the bottom line of the memo:



That's hugely important in knocking the whole memo off of any need to be considered.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:

Spencer Ackerman on this:

In its attempt to claim that ex-British spy Christopher Steele’s salacious dossier played a central role in the surveillance of Trump aides – a claim the memo’s own admissions undermine – the memo claims that McCabe told the House intelligence committee that Steele was a pillar of information for a surveillance warrant application.

[...]

Asked if that was a true representation, a source familiar with McCabe’s testimony responded: “100% not.”

A senior Democratic House intelligence committee official agreed.

“The Majority purposefully mischaracterizes both what is actually contained in the FISA applications and the testimony of former FBI Deputy McCabe before our committee in December 2017 – the Minority’s memo lays out the full facts,” the official said.

  Daily Beast

And we'll have to wait for that to be released .... and who do you think has the say-so over that? Not the minority.