Bless

 

Look at the man.  He IS AI.  I want to know who built HIM.  Hybrid?

Aside from the morality, this is not a great outlook

 

Also...Wag the Dog in the age of AI is so much easier.

UPDATE 03:25 pm:

The authorized-departure message from Mike Huckabee, the ambassador to Israel and a supporter of the war, said employees should try to leave “TODAY.”

[...]

The State Department has come under intense criticism for not urging the many thousands of American citizens in the region to leave before the start of the war — the Trump administration and Israel had been planning secretly to conduct military strikes for many weeks — and for providing limited help to evacuate them once the missiles began flying.

  NYT

Trump claimed there just wasn't time because it all happened so fast. If his lips are moving, he's lying.

On March 2, after the war began, the State Department issued a mandatory ordered departure for nonessential employees at missions in Iraq, Jordan and Bahrain.

Just a reminder: Mike Huckabee is a Christian nationalist evangelical. I assume that's why he was given the post. Perhaps the worst person possible for it.

It'll fool Trump

 

War on Americans

 It's coming from inside the house.

Who gets to decide when the government AI-bots are ready to start killing people without direct human oversight—the Pentagon or the AI companies?

This remarkable—some might say insane—question is at the center of a major standoff between the Defense Department and Anthropic, creator of the AI platform known as Claude. While the Pentagon has contracts with all the leading AI labs, Anthropic until this month was the only one contracted for AI use in classified settings: Claude was, for instance, reportedly involved in the operation to capture Nicolas Maduro.

[...]

But Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has grown unhappy with two elements of the DoD’s contract with Anthropic. One, Anthropic won’t let its AI be used to conduct mass surveillance of Americans. Two, it won’t let the DoD use it to operate autonomous weapons systems that can identify, track, and kill targets without direct human involvement.

  The Bulwark

Can't wait for that one to go tits up and track Pete Hegseth. Like those cartoons where the heat-seeking missile turns around and follows Wile-E-Coyote unstead of the Roadrunner.

To the Defense Department, the idea that a contractor would be able to tie the military’s hands like this is outlandish; they should be permitted, they argue, to use AI they contract for “for all lawful purposes.”

Doesn't the Defense Department have its own AI platform? In the alternative, can't they use Elon's AI?

Hegseth could simply drop Anthropic’s contract over this, pivoting instead to any of the AI labs—OpenAI, Google Gemini, Elon Musk’s xAI—that aren’t insisting on these contractual sticking points. But he doesn’t really want to. After all, Claude is supposed to be the best, and at any rate it’s already integrated into lots of DoD systems. It’d be a hassle.

Hold fast, Claude.

Hegseth has issued Anthropic an ultimatum: Change your policy, or we’re going to start getting nasty.

Start?

The Defense Department is threatening to use the Defense Production Act to compel Anthropic to drop its usage requirements. Or it could go the exact opposite direction, declaring Anthropic a “supply chain risk”—which would not only eliminate DoD’s Anthropic contract, but also forbid any business that contracts with DoD from working with Anthropic in any way.

And...

The Trump administration on Friday ordered all U.S. agencies to stop using Anthropic’s artificial intelligence technology and imposed other major penalties, escalating an unusually public clash between the government and the company over AI safety [...] accusing it of endangering national security after CEO Dario Amodei refused to back down over concerns the company’s products could be used in ways that would violate its safeguards.

“We don’t need it, we don’t want it, and will not do business with them again!” Trump said on social media.

Hegseth also deemed the company a “supply chain risk,” a designation typically stamped on foreign adversaries that could derail the company’s critical partnerships with other businesses.

  AP News

Vengeful, despicable assholes.

I hear you, man.

In a statement issued Friday evening, Anthropic said it would challenge what it called an unprecedented and legally unsound action “never before publicly applied to an American company.”

Anthropic had said it sought narrow assurances from the Pentagon that its AI chatbot Claude would not be used for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons. The Pentagon said it was not interested in such uses and would only deploy the technology in legal ways, but it also insisted on access without any limitations.

Kudos to Anthropic for not taking the figleaf "assurance".

“No amount of intimidation or punishment from the Department of War will change our position on mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons,” the company said. “We will challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.”

Too bad major institutions in this country did not take the same principled stance against Trump's attempted domination.

Anthropic can afford to lose the contract. But the government’s actions posed broader risks at the peak of the company’s meteoric rise from a little-known computer science research lab in San Francisco to one of the world’s most valuable startups.

[...]

Hours after its competitor was punished, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced on Friday night that his company struck a deal with the Pentagon to supply its AI to classified military networks, potentially filling a gap created by Anthropic’s ouster.

But Altman said that the same red lines that were the sticking point in Anthropic’s dispute with the Pentagon are now enshrined in OpenAI’s new partnership.

“Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems,” Altman wrote, adding that the Defense Department “agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.”

  AP News

Let me guess. Altman was perfectly satisfied with DOD's "assurances".

Trump said Anthropic made a mistake trying to strong-arm the Pentagon. He wrote on Truth Social that most agencies must immediately stop using Anthropic’s AI but gave the Pentagon a six-month period to phase out the technology that is already embedded in military platforms.

“The United States of America will never allow a radical left, woke company to dictate how our great military fights and wins wars!” he wrote in all caps.

[...]

rump’s social media post said the company “better get their act together, and be helpful” during the phase-out period or there would be “major civil and criminal consequences to follow.”

So fucking sick of this asshole's ignorant rhetoric and petulant tantrums. And that's the least of our problems with him.

The president’s decision was preceded by hours of top Trump appointees from the Pentagon and the State Department taking to social media to criticize Anthropic, but their complaints posed contradictions.

Top Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said Anthropic’s unwillingness to go along with the military’s demands was “jeopardizing critical military operations and potentially putting our warfighters at risk.” Hegseth said the Pentagon “must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic.”

Yes, we've seen how this administration treats the law.

Hegseth’s choice to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk uses an administrative tool that has been designed for companies owned by U.S. adversaries to prevent them from selling products that are harmful to American interests.

Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, noted that this dynamic, “combined with inflammatory rhetoric attacking that company, raises serious concerns about whether national security decisions are being driven by careful analysis or political considerations.”

Gee, how could we possibly know?

The moves could benefit OpenAI’s ChatGPT as well as Elon Musk’s competing chatbot, Grok, which the Pentagon also plans to give access to classified military networks. It could serve as a warning to Google, which has a still-evolving contract to supply its AI tools to the military.

Grok has been so untainted by errors and horrors, so, good plans.

Musk sided with Trump’s administration, saying on his social media platform X that “Anthropic hates Western Civilization.”

JFC. MAGA mentality is killing us.

Retired Air Force Gen. Jack Shanahan, a former leader of the Pentagon’s AI initiatives, wrote on social media this week that the government “painting a bullseye on Anthropic garners spicy headlines, but everyone loses in the end.”

Shanahan said Claude is already being widely used across the government, including in classified settings, and Anthropic’s red lines were “reasonable.” He said the AI large language models that power chatbots like Claude, Grok and ChatGPT are also “not ready for prime time in national security settings,” particularly not for fully autonomous weapons.

What could possibly go wrong?

UPDATE 03/07/2026:

UPDATE 03/11/2026:

AI defense system?

 Is AI why Trump wants to bomb Iran?

Also, could AI be any worse than letting Pete Hegseth and Donald Trump have access to classified defense systems?

And who's going to stop him?

 

We are living in a David Lynch movie

Elon Muskovites go unchecked

Whatever happened to MAGA's outrage over child sexual abuse?

UPDATE 01/09/2026:

UPDATE 01/10/2026:

In case you were wondering...

President Donald Trump said Monday that he authorized Nvidia to sell its powerful H200 artificial-intelligence chip in China in exchange for taking 25 percent of the revenue — a major win for the U.S. chipmaker that caps weeks of internal deliberations.

[...]

Clearing the H200 for sale in China gives Nvidia and its CEO, Jensen Huang, a major boost after Huang visited Capitol Hill and personally met with Trump.

A spokesperson for Nvidia confirmed the deal in a statement, calling it “a thoughtful balance that is great for America.”

[...]

Lawmakers have raised concerns that lifting curbs on the export of the chips will give Beijing a technological edge at U.S. expense.

[...]

The move also provoked unease among Washington technology and defense policy experts, who warned it may jeopardize America’s lead in the emerging area.

  Politico

 

Trump may have been too stupid to understand.  Or simply doesn't care.  Or more likely, is making some profit for himself off the deal.

Here's a tip regarding AI...

 

Cruelty is the point

Don't fucking comply!  Sue!

UPDATE 05:30 pm:

 

Good advice regarding AI

 

Grok is at it again

 

Christofascists in tech world

 

Chipping away at Medicare

 

Maybe don't use AI for your interior design

 

Hostile takeover

Last week, the White House released an “AI Action Plan” and three executive orders on artificial intelligence: “Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure,” “Promoting the Export of the American AI Technology Stack,” and “Preventing Woke AI In the Federal Government.” The overall goal is to develop AI as fast as possible by removing bureaucratic impediments and export controls on chips and other equipment, placing data centers on federal land, promoting energy production to power them (as long as it isn’t renewable energy), and integrating AI systems into the federal government. All that’s asked of the AI companies themselves is to make sure their large language models (LLMs) promote a Trump-friendly view of the world.

[...]

“So from this day forward, it'll be a policy of the United States to do whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence,” he said. “Such an important thing happening. This is really something that nobody expected. It just popped out of the air, and here we are.”

And of course, Trump contrasted his approach with that of President Biden, about whom he said, “You would've spent a lot of money and you wouldn't have been able to win. They didn't allow you to win. But we have a plan which only admires and respects the winners.”

[...]

“If you are operating under 50 different sets of state laws, the most restrictive state of all will be the one that rules,” he said. “So you could have a state run by a crazy governor, a governor that hates you, a governor that's not smart, or maybe a governor that's very smart, but decides that he doesn't like the industry and he can put you out of business because you're going to have to go to that lowest common denominator.”

  Public Notice

Hmmmmm...Dobbs? CASA?

Trump also endorsed the AI companies’ desire to utilize copyrighted works without compensating the authors.

“You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every single article, book, or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for. ‘Gee, I read a book. I'm supposed to pay somebody,’” he said. “And we appreciate that, but you just can't do it because it's not doable.”

Proof by assertion.

But the really good stuff — at least as far as Trump and his movement are concerned — is in the “Preventing Woke AI” executive order.

In order to stamp out “pervasive and destructive” DEI ideology, the order insists that AI models must be free of “incorporation of concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism.” Only banishing those ideas will demonstrate a sufficient “commitment to truth” and ensure “reliable AI.” The order does note that its ambitions are limited: “While the Federal Government should be hesitant to regulate the functionality of AI models in the private marketplace, in the context of Federal procurement, it has the obligation not to procure models that sacrifice truthfulness and accuracy to ideological agendas.” It also insists that “LLMs shall be neutral, nonpartisan tools that do not manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas such as DEI.”

Isn't that non-neutral in itself? Sorry, I keep trying to insert logic.

This leaves AI companies with a choice: Either create two sets of AI systems — one for general use, and a right-wing version for government — or just make all their systems Trump-compliant.

AI has limits!

 

Elon tweaked Grok

 So it's no longer "woke".

UPDATE 07/13/2025:

The official chatbot account said xAI was deleting the antisemitic posts on Tuesday and had “taken action” to ban “hate speech” from Grok.

[...]

“First off, we deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced,” [Musk's xAI] said in a lengthy post on social media platform X. “Our intent for@grok is to provide helpful and truthful responses to users. After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot. This is independent of the underlying language model that powers @grok.”

[...]

“The update was active for 16 hrs, in which deprecated code made @grok susceptible to existing X user posts; including when such posts contained extremist views,” xAI wrote on Saturday. “We have removed that deprecated code and refactored the entire system to prevent further abuse. The new system prompt for the @grok bot will be published to our public github repo.”

xAI rolled out the latest version of Grok on Wednesday, with Musk arguing that Grok 4 is the “smartest AI model in the world.” [...] “Smarter than almost all graduate students in all disciplines simultaneously.”

  The Hill

Not sure that's a great brag.

AI will cause the destruction of the world