Showing posts with label Santos crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Santos crime. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 11, 2023

Good lord, there's MORE

Federal prosecutors added major allegations to the indictment charging the House Republican George Santos with fraud and lying about his campaign finance disclosures, presenting evidence that he stole donors’ identities and charged thousands of dollars to their credit cards without their knowledge.

The new charges, revealed in a superseding indictment returned on Tuesday by a grand jury in New York, increases the legal peril for the embattled congressman given that his former campaign treasurer, Nancy Marks, last week pleaded guilty to defrauding the United States.

[...]

The scheme involved one instance where Santos allegedly stole the billing details of a donor’s two credit cards and made transfers to his campaign. To get around the fact that they exceeded legal limits, prosecutors said, Santos falsely listed himself and relatives as the sources of the funds.

On one occasion, prosecutors said, Santos charged $12,000 to the donor’s credit card – money that ultimately ended up in his personal account.

[...]

The deception included false FEC reports that said at least 10 family members of Santos and Marks had made significant contributions to the campaign, as well as false reports that said Santos had loaned large amounts of money to his campaign, including one $500,000 loan.

  Guardian
So that answers the question about where he got that money.
Santos insisted he had not seen the new allegations and that he would not resign his seat.
Of course not.  He's made it this far refusing to leave. You think the House GOP will sideline him NOW? No, probably not.  They've made it this far letting him slide.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 10/12/2023:


Good on them.  And we'll see.


UPDATE 04/26/2025:


Surely he's asked for a pardon?

Friday, May 12, 2023

George Santos: Wanted on two continents

At a federal courthouse Wednesday on Long Island, Santos relinquished his passports and was released on $500,000 bond. He will need permission for any travel beyond New York and Washington.

[...]

Rep. George Santos signed a deal with Brazilian prosecutors Thursday in which the New York Republican confessed to theft and agreed to pay restitution and fines if prosecutors agree to drop the criminal case against him, bringing a likely resolution in a case that has tailed the embattled politician for more than a decade.

[...]

“The case ended today,” Santos lawyer Jonymar Vasconcelos said in a brief interview. “My client is no longer facing any charges in Brazil.”

  WaPo
Well, not exactly.
[H]e was given 30 days to pay around $2,000 in fines and $2,800 to the victim. The case won’t be dismissed until the payments are made, court officials said.

[...]

According to authorities, Santos, then 19, entered a small clothing store in Niterói called the Salt in 2008 and wrote two bad checks worth $430 for clothing and shoes, court documents show. The merchant soon after went to the police and reported it, leading to a criminal embezzlement charge against Santos.

“I remember because I had to pay that value out of my own pocket,” merchant Carlos Bruno Simões told Folha de S.Paulo last year.

Simões attended the Thursday hearing, which lasted less than a half-hour. He said he was disappointed in how little Santos will be forced to pay him.

“He got off super cheap,” he said.

[...]

[Santos] was indicted Wednesday in the Eastern District of New York.

[...]

Wire fraud, the most serious charge, carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison, though experts said a penalty that severe was unlikely.

[...]

At a federal courthouse Wednesday on Long Island, Santos relinquished his passports and was released on $500,000 bond. He will need permission for any travel beyond New York and Washington.
Well, there goes his chance to abscond back to Brazil.
In addition to his federal case in New York, Santos also faces a probe by the House Ethics Committee. The panel announced in March that it was investigating a host of claims about the Republican lawmaker involving his past business practices, campaign finance expenditures and an allegation of sexual misconduct.
But he's not resigning. If Trump can do it, so can he.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, May 11, 2023

Santos back on the streets


What's the over/under on Santos being spirited back to Brazil?  Oh, wait.  I think he's wanted there for some other crimes.  

UPDATE :  Return to court date: June 30



Wednesday, May 10, 2023

George Santos charges




Santos, who turned himself into a federal courthouse in New York, has been charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.

  Guardian UK
Dang. That's a lot of lawbreaking. I guess he's still running to hold his seat in 2024. Unlike Trump, though, I don't think he has much of a chance. Please let me not be wrong!


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 09:40 am:



Oh dear god.  It wasn't clear.

UPDATE 05:55 pm:  What else do you need to know about Kevin McCarthy?


Pathetic.

Tuesday, May 9, 2023

How's our Earth simulation going?

Still spinning out of control I see.

Yesterday George Santos said he wants to make public policy entertaining because as it is, it's boring, and he "cannot bear to watch CSPAN." (Christ, Marj and Boebert have been doing their level best to make it entertaining. What more does he want them to do?)  

Today, I think he probably won't have time for CSPAN for a while.
Justice Department prosecutors have charged Rep. George Santos with federal offenses, two sources familiar with the matter tell NBC News, the most significant escalation in a growing pile of investigations that have plagued the first-term lawmaker since before he even took office.

The New York Republican, who faced legal and political pressure to resign from Congress after he admitted to lying about parts of his background, is the subject of multiple investigations into his finances and other issues.

  MSN
It's unclear what the charges are. CNN reported they were filed under seal and that the New York congressman is expected to appear in federal court as soon as Wednesday. The outlet said federal prosecutors were investigating campaign finance filings, among other things.

  Business Insider
Oh, I hope it's something more entertaining than that.

Stay tuned.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 05/10/2023:
Santos, who turned himself into a federal courthouse in New York, has been charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.

  Guardian UK
Dang. That's a lot of lawbreaking. I guess he's still running to hold his seat in 2024. Unlike Trump, though, I don't think he has much of a chance. Please let me not be wrong!

UPDATE 05/11/2023:


Good luck with that!

Friday, March 10, 2023

Honestly, Santos scandals never end

Is this guy even old enough to encompass all the scams he's perpetrated?  


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, February 11, 2023

No, actually, it DOESN'T ever stop

Rep. George Santos was charged with theft in Pennsylvania’s Amish Country in 2017 after a series of bad checks were written in his name to dog breeders, according to the court and a lawyer friend who helped him address the charge.

Just days after $15,125 in checks were made out for “puppies,” according to the memo lines, Santos held an adoption event at a Staten Island pet store with his animal rescue charity Friends of Pets United.

[...]

The charge was dismissed and his record expunged after Santos claimed someone had stolen his checkbook, according to the court and the lawyer.

  Politico
Oh, like he stole that old man's checkbook in Brazil?
The recipients attempted to cash the checks at Coatesville Savings Bank and Bank of Bird-in-Hand in Pennsylvania.

Just three days after the $775 check is dated — on Nov. 25, 2017 — Santos’ animal charity Friends of Pets United held a puppy adoption event at the Staten Island pet store Pet Oasis.

[...]

The New York Times reported this week that Santos had an unusual request for the pet store owner Daniel Avissato after an adoption event at Pet Oasis. He asked Avissato to make a check with the proceeds out to his name instead of the name of the charity. Avissato said he refused, but later noticed — when he looked at his bank records — that the check had been changed to the way Santos wanted it.
Jesus. Nothing criminal there, eh?
Later that same year, in December 2017, Michele Vazzo said she met Santos at Pet Oasis when she adopted a puppy at another event. Santos told her the golden retriever was rescued from an Amish puppy mill. There were many dogs at the charity events, and adoption costs ranged from $300 to $400, she recalled.

[...]

Santos told her different stories about where the puppies came from, sometimes saying he found pregnant dogs on the street and other times claiming he rescued them in Puerto Rico or other places, she said.

[...]

The charity was not a registered nonprofit or rescue group

[...]

“In 2017 [Santos] received four check books for the account at his request from the TD BANK branch he banked with in Queens, NY, and of the four one went missing,” [his attorney] wrote to the Pennsylvania trooper.

“He immediately called his bank upon learning 1/4 check books was missing and all checks were canceled at that time, with a stop pay on all checks.”

“As such no checks were ever cashed or presented against his account due to his cancellation of all checks linked to this account. The account was closed on March 3, 2018, for personal reasons unrelated to any alleged fraud on his account (banking preference),” Bogosian wrote.
Obviously, he got the checks to perpetrate the puppy scheme and then closed the account.
She noted to the trooper that the signatures were different on each of the checks and attached Santos’ New York State driver’s license to show his signature on that ID didn’t match any of the ones on the checks. She wrote that Santos was clearly a victim of fraud — but hadn’t realized it until he was served with the warrant because he’d canceled the checks and later closed the account.

[...]

“I did think it was so weird at the time that his checks didn’t have his address or phone number listed on them."
Unbelievable. Literally. Who else would sign each check differently than he? And then...
Santos told [the attorney], because he was involved in politics, he couldn’t have an outstanding charge against him. A week after their meeting, he went to Pennsylvania to address the warrant, and told prosecutors that he “worked for the S.E.C.,” successfully persuading them to drop the charges, she remembered him telling her after he returned.
Amazing.

It's like he's been careening from one con to the next all his life.  (So, of COURSE he'd end up in the US Congress.)




UPDATE 07:56 am:


Santos has all the hallmarks of a textbook narcissist, including this one: lying about lying.

UPDATE 08:05 am:


Easy to believe Santos is lying here, but not entirely certain Sinema isn't.

Wednesday, February 1, 2023

The Santos Saga

Just keeps getting better and better.
“I’ve learned my lesson and I can guarantee you that from now on anything, everything is always going to be aboveboard,” Santos said in an interview with Caitlin Sinclair on One America News.

  The Hill
I'll try to continue, but I'll need time to laugh hilariously.
“It’s largely always been aboveboard,” he continued. “I’m just gonna go the extra step now to double-check, cross-reference everything.”
Quite. All those lies and the thievery were just because he hadn't double-checked and cross-reference.
In the interview, Santos maintained that he has “never” presented falsehoods about his personal finances. He added that he lied about his education because he believed he would be “looked down on” by other people if he did not have a diploma.

“I’ve never had to establish or present falsehoods pertaining to my own finances,” he said. “I’m the first one to say not doing that.”
Apparently not lying was not part of the "lesson" he learned.
McCarthy said last week that Santos would be removed from his office if the House Ethics Committee concludes that he broke campaign finance law.
He should start packing then.
Nancy Marks, who served as treasurer for Santos’s 2020 and 2022 campaigns, said in a letter to the FEC that she left her position Wednesday.

[...]

The campaign had begun preparing for Marks to leave her role last week, but an obstacle occurred when the expected replacement said he would not serve in the role.

[...]

“On Monday we informed the Santos campaign that Mr. Datwyler would not be serving as treasurer,” attorney Derek Ross said. “It appears there’s a disconnect between that conversation and the filings today, which we did not authorize.”

  The Hill
Jesus. Is the Santos campaign trying to outdo the Trump campaign?
[Santos] submitted an amended campaign filing to the FEC last week to indicate that a $500,000 loan and a $125,000 loan that he said came from his personal funds came from another source.
And now we wait to find out the identity of "another source."  Aside from Andrew Intrater, if any.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, January 28, 2023

The Santos news never stops

Is he a money laundering or mere campaign finance violation?  If it's money laundering, Santos could end up "falling" out of a hotel window.
In September 2020, George Santos’ congressional campaign reported that Victoria and Jonathan Regor had each contributed $2,800—the maximum amount—to his first bid for a House seat. Their listed address was 45 New Mexico Street in Jackson Township, New Jersey.

A search of various databases reveals no one in the United States named Victoria or Jonathan Regor. Moreover, there is nobody by any name living at 45 New Mexico Street in Jackson. That address doesn’t exist.

[...]

Santos’ 2020 campaign finance reports also list a donor named Stephen Berger as a $2,500 donor and said he was a retiree who lived on Brandt Road in Brawley, California. But a spokesperson for William Brandt, a prominent rancher and Republican donor, tells Mother Jones that Brandt has lived at that address for at least 20 years and “neither he or his wife (the only other occupant [at the Brandt Road home]) have made any donations to George Santos. He does not know Stephen Berger nor has Stephen Berger ever lived at…Brandt Road.”

The Regor and Berger contributions are among more than a dozen major donations to the 2020 Santos campaign for which the name or the address of the donor cannot be confirmed.

[...]

These questionable donations [...] account for more than $30,000 of the $338,000 the Santos campaign raised from individual donors in 2020.

[...]

The retirees listed as big donors for Santos include Jason and Lesley Goodman. They jointly donated $5,600 in late September 2020. A search of public records unearthed no one named Lesley Goodman living in New York. According to Santos’ FEC filings, the Goodmans reside at 220 Central Park South, a luxury skyscraper on Billionaires’ Row. The building’s penthouse sold for a record-breaking $238 million in 2019. Two employees at 220 Central Park South said that no one named Jason Goodman lives in that building.

[...]

Talking Points Memo has also reported a case of a Santos donor being charged for contributions he or she did not approve.

[...]

During Santos’ first run for Congress, only about 45 people maxed out to his campaign during the primary and general elections. In nine instances, Mother Jones found no way to contact the donor because no person by that name now lives at the address listed on the reports the Santos campaign filed with the FEC. None had ever contributed to a candidate before sending Santos the maximum amount allowed, according to FEC records. Nor have any of these donors contributed since. The Santos campaign’s filings list the profession of each of these donors as “retired.”

Two other donors who contributed $1,500 and $2,000, respectively, were listed in Santos’ FEC filings as retirees residing at addresses that do not exist. One was named Rafael Da Silva—which happens to be the name of a Brazilian soccer player.

[...]

Nancy Marks, a veteran Republican campaign operative, served as Santos’ treasurer in 2020 and 2022. On Wednesday, Santos’ campaign committees filed paperwork with the FEC stating that Thomas Datwyler was replacing Marks. (Marks did not respond to requests for comment.)

But [...] Datwyler’s attorney said that Datwyler had told Santos’ team that he did not want the job. For now, Santos appears to be effectively without a treasurer.

  Mother Jones
And up a creek without a paddle.
On Friday, Datwyler sent a letter to the FEC requesting the commission refer the matter to the “appropriate law enforcement agency to determine whether a crime has occurred.” Also that day, the Justice Department asked the FEC to hold off on any enforcement action against Santos, according to the Washington Post—a sign the feds are proceeding with their investigation of Santos.
If you need a refresher on the list of Santos' lies and Brazilian crimes, this article contains them. These false donation reports are different in that they are illegal and prosecutable in this country.

And one more tidbit...
One [legitimate donor] reported giving to the Santos campaign in 2020 after requesting that a campaign fundraiser have someone from the National Republican Congressional Committee contact him and vouch for Santos.

[...]

The Santos fundraiser later arranged for this donor to have breakfast with Santos at a restaurant about an hour’s drive from the donor’s home. The donor arrived for the meeting, but Santos stood him up and, afterward, ignored his calls, according to the donor. Santos later phoned this donor to ask for more money. He did not give again.
Jesus.

UPDATE 11:41 am:


UPDATE 02/02/2023:
Last week, Mother Jones reported that more than a dozen top donors to Rep. George Santos’ first congressional campaign did not appear to exist. The donations from people whose names or addresses could not be confirmed totaled more than $30,000. This pattern of questionable contributions, Mother Jones has learned, extends to Santos’ successful campaign last year.

According to Santos’ campaign filings with the Federal Election Commission, his recent campaign pulled in more than $45,000 from relatives who lived in Queens. This included a mail handler who gave more than $4,000, a painter who donated the maximum of $5,800, and a student who also contributed $5,800. One of Santos’ relatives, who was recorded as giving $5,800, says that they did not make any donation to Santos.

[...]

“It’s all news to me.” This person added, “I don’t have that money to throw around!”

[...]

Santos’ 2022 campaign filings list his sister Tiffany giving more than $5,000. (She also ran Rise NY, a political action committee that paid her more than $21,000.) When a Mother Jones reporter contacted her on Tuesday, she would not confirm whether she or her relatives had made the contributions attributed to them by Santos’ campaign. Last month, the Daily Beast reported that New York court records show that Tiffany was facing potential eviction for failure to pay rent.

[...]

The questions sparked by contributions to Santos’ campaign add to a number of money mysteries dogging Santos. He has yet to identify the source of $705,000 he loaned his 2022 campaign. Nor has he explained his curious personal finances. In 2020, he declared on his financial disclosure form that he had made $55,000 in salary that year working for a company that organized investor conferences. In 2022, his financial disclosure filing stated that he had made between $3.5 million and $11.5 million through a company he set up in May 2021, after another firm he worked for had been accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of operating a Ponzi scheme. [...] And he has repeatedly lied about his career, education, family history, and much more.

[...]

Several complaints regarding Santos’ campaign finances have been filed with the FEC. He is under investigation by local, state, and federal law enforcement. The Justice Department recently told the FEC to stand down as federal prosecutors pursue a criminal investigation of Santos’ campaign finance practices.

  Mother Jones

Sunday, January 22, 2023

Santos saga continues: financial crime?

A month after the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit in 2021 accusing a Florida-based company of operating a Ponzi scheme, one of the firm’s account managers assured an anxious client that his money was safe.

The client, a wealthy investor named Andrew Intrater, had been lured by annual returns of 16 percent and had invested $625,000 in a fund offered by the company, Harbor City Capital — in part because he trusted and admired the account manager, an aspiring politician named George Santos.

[...]

The letter of credit did not exist, the S.E.C. would later tell a court. The $100 million that Mr. Santos told Mr. Intrater that he had personally raised for Harbor City did not exist either, the commission said. Nor, seemingly, did the close to $4 million that Mr. Santos claimed he and his family had invested in Harbor City.

Mr. Santos’s representations form the basis of a sworn declaration that Mr. Intrater gave the S.E.C. in May 2022, as part of its Harbor City investigation.

[...]

Mr. Intrater told the S.E.C. that the representations influenced his decision to invest in Mr. Santos’s business and political endeavors — an allegation that could leave Mr. Santos vulnerable to criminal charges.

[...]

He shared with The New York Times text messages that he exchanged with Mr. Santos, as well as documents and the declaration that he had given to the S.E.C. — all outlining the ways in which he said Mr. Santos had misled him.

[...]

Although Mr. Santos claimed to have raised $100 million for Harbor City, S.E.C. documents say the firm had only raised a total of $17 million. And while Mr. Santos said that he and his family had invested millions of dollars because of Harbor City, financial disclosures filed during his 2020 run for Congress show that he earned just $55,000 that year, and had no assets.

[...]

According to court documents filed by the S.E.C., Harbor City told investors that it had discovered a way to make guaranteed money by investing in digital marketing and advertising.

But Harbor City was not doing any such investing, and only a small part of the $17 million it raised was used for legitimate business expenses, the government claims. The company, according to civil charges filed by the S.E.C., was instead engaged in a Ponzi scheme, using investments from new clients to make payments to older investors.

[...]

Mr. Intrater became one of Mr. Santos’s more generous patrons. In addition to his investments in Harbor City funds, first reported by The Washington Post, he donated more than $200,000 to Mr. Santos’s election campaign, associated political committees and a New York PAC that he would later learn was controlled by Mr. Santos’s sister.

[...]

Mr. Santos, who was not named in the S.E.C. suit, has publicly said he had no knowledge of wrongdoing at Harbor City.

[...]

Mr. Intrater is a private equity investor perhaps best known for his financial ties to Viktor Vekselberg, his cousin. Mr. Vekselberg is a Russian oligarch whose U.S. assets were frozen in 2018 by the Treasury Department because of his ties to the Kremlin.

[...]

Mr. Intrater is also known for his relationship with Michael D. Cohen, Donald J. Trump’s onetime personal lawyer; Mr. Intrater’s firm, Columbus Nova, signed Mr. Cohen to a $1 million consulting contract when the businessman was looking for new investment opportunities in 2018.

  NYT
I think you can judge the legitimacy of Mr. Intrater's activities themeselves by the connections he has to well-known shady characters.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.