Showing posts with label Trump testimony. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump testimony. Show all posts

Thursday, January 25, 2024

Trump's rape case damages trial went off...well...

After a delay of three days due to a covid scare in the courtroom, E Jean Carroll's damages trial got going today.







Judge Kaplan is keeping it tight.
[Kaplan's] regular courtroom has a “No Smoking”-style sign outside the doors with a cellphone in a crossed out circle. Trump’s ongoing trial is taking place inside a different room, but court security officers make a habit of instructing spectators not to bring any inside the proceedings.

[...]

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign spokesman was booted out of court on Thursday afternoon after his cellphone alarm went off in the middle of a witness’s testimony [...] .

"Whose telephone is that?" senior U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan asked sharply.

After Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung raised his hand, Kaplan told court security officers: "Take this man out of here.”

A federal jurist with three decades of experience — and a reputation for maintaining strict compliance with the rules he lays down — Kaplan has presided over both of Carroll’s lawsuits against the former president. The first one ended in a $5 million verdict against Trump for sexual abuse and defamation, and the ongoing one threatens to pile on millions more if Carroll prevails.

  The Messenger


Aaaaand....they're off!


I wonder if the reason Joe Tacopina left the Trump attorney lineup recently had anything to do with this issue of Trump not testifying at the actual trial where Tacopina reportedly advised him not to.  And now Trump's mad about it.


I'm kind of surprised that didn't get a remark from the judge.





And we'll be hearing from Trump in front of TV cameras and on "Truth Social" next.

Stay tuned.


UPDATE 01:39 pm:


After Habba asked if Trump denied the allegations because Carroll made the claim, Trump replied: "Exactly right," before trailing off: "She said something. I considered it a false accusation," prompting an objection. Kaplan sustained and struck the second part of the answer.

Asked if he wanted to hurt Carroll, Trump said: "No. I wanted to defend myself, my family, and frankly, the presidency." Kaplan struck that too. With that, his direct examination was over, and his cross was similarly brief.

On his way out, Trump sneered at the spectators in the gallery and said, "It's not America. It's not America. This is not America."

  The Messenger
UPDATE 01/26/2024: 

Trump attended closing arguments but stormed out before Carroll's attorney finished. Great publicity, I guess.

Monday, November 6, 2023

Fun times in New York Court - Part 1

Quote of the day:
Looks like it went that way pretty much the whole time...






I foresee some steam on Truth Social this afternoon.








Well...to compose a tweet...


And, like his sons, Trump wants us to believe he had nothing to do with his company's finances...


I can believe the sons didn't know jack shit about anything, but Trump wouldn't leave his finances to someone else.  His money is the only thing important to  him.


Another possible reason for the rants: "It may just be that Mr. Trump is incoherent, that his answers make quite literally no sense."

  Chuck Rosenberg @ MSNBC
And that he's more of a bundle of reactive cells that think they're a king than a human being.



So much for just answering the question.  That was never going to fly.



And that's lunch.

We'll be back in a bit with part 2.

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

The "Mueller Report"

An analytical article in Wired lays out why we may not be needing an actual report to know what Mueller will be reporting, and why he may have waited for Trump's written answers to interrogatories presented by the Mueller team before filing charges against Manafort for non-cooperation contrary to his plea bargain, and before taking likely action to indict Roger Stone and Trump Junior.

I wonder whether the interrogatories and answers will be made public at some point in our lifetime.  I'd like to see them.

The article also reminds us that there have been three dozen sealed indictments filed over the past year, fourteen of which have been filed since August.  We don't know who's named in all that, or indeed if they're related to Mueller's investigation. It seems most probable they are since word was already out that Sessions would be fired after the midterms, and that left Rod Rosenstein as the person who could approve such filings until a new AG was appointed.  Mueller would want to get all his indictments on file while he had Rosenstein as a boss.  Now that they've been filed, he can pull them out whenever he's ready.  Which I hope is soon.

Read the article here.

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Let's make a deal

Donald Trump’s legal team has rejected the special counsel Robert Mueller’s latest terms for an interview with the president as part of the Russia investigation, and put forward a counter-offer.

[...]

The lawyers did not want Trump answering questions about potential obstruction of justice.

  Guardian
Come to think of it, while he often screams "NO COLLUSION" in his tweets, he never says anything about no obstruction of justice.
Giuliani said negotiations over a potential sitdown should wrap up by the end of the month.

“We do not want to run into the November elections. So back up from that, this should be over by September 1,” he said in the radio appearance. “If there is going to be an interview, let’s have it. If there’s not going to be an interview, let him write his report.”
It's not going to be over by September 1, Rudy.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Further proof of obstruction: he won't answer questions about it

President Donald Trump’s legal team has submitted a counteroffer to special counsel Robert Mueller on a possible interview with the president that could allow for questions about collusion with Russia but curtail inquiries related to obstruction of justice.

[...]

“We think the obstruction of it is handled by Article 2 of the Constitution,” Mr. Giuliani said, referring to the provision that gives the president executive authority to appoint and dismiss members of his administration.

  WSJ
As though the firing of Comey is the only attempt to obstruct justice.
Mr. Trump’s lawyers have previously suggested they were willing to have the president answer questions about obstruction of justice—in particular, the firing of Mr. Comey and of former national security adviser Mike Flynn —but said they wouldn’t be open to Mr. Trump answering questions about his business dealings.

[...]

Negotiations between the president’s legal team and Mr. Mueller over the terms of a possible interview have been under way since January, and it’s unclear if such a sit-down will ever occur.
So the list of what he won't answer is getting longer. Mr. Mueller may not even need him to answer questions, but wouldn't that be a joy to watch?

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Dear God, they simply CAN'T let him testify

Lawyers advising President Donald Trump in the Russia investigation hope to decide whether he should testify by May 17, the one-year anniversary of the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller, Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said Monday.

  Wall Street Journal
Although, honestly, who's listening to Rudy any more?
In an interview, Mr. Giuliani said, “every day we swing a little different” on whether to advise Mr. Trump to talk to Mr. Mueller, though he suggested that recent developments in the probe have made him more leery.

The president’s initial position was “what do I have to lose? I’m telling the truth,” Mr. Giuliani said. But Mr. Trump has also promised to weigh his lawyers’ advice.

[...]

“I’m not sure any client of mine has ever testified, and I sure as heck have benefited from ones who were dumb enough to do it” when he served as a prosecutor, Mr. Giuliani said.
Brilliant, Rudy. Just brilliant. Is Trump "dumb enough to do it"?
Preparing Mr. Trump to testify would be a serious distraction to his work as president, eating into time he needs to deal with pressing global issues, Mr. Trump’s lawyers contend.
What about all that "executive time" before 11 am when he's watching TV?
In an informal, four-hour practice session, Mr. Trump’s lawyers were only able to walk him through two questions, given the frequent interruptions on national-security matters along with Mr. Trump’s loquaciousness, one person familiar with the matter said.
Oh, holy shit. Four hours. Two questions. You can bet your firstborn child there were zero national security matter interruptions.

They simply CAN'T let him testify.
Meanwhile, the turnover has created a separate problem for Mr. Trump’s defense: His lawyers lack security clearances, which could limit the documents and materials they can see.
Frowny face.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, April 4, 2018

Trump lawyers leak Mueller Info

Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III informed President Trump’s attorneys last month that he is continuing to investigate the president but does not consider him a criminal target at this point, according to three people familiar with the discussions.

  WaPo
And even if he didn't, Mueller won't deny it, because Mueller doesn't leak.
The special counsel also told Trump’s lawyers that he is preparing a report about the president’s actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice, according to two people with knowledge of the conversations.

Mueller reiterated the need to interview Trump — both to understand whether he had any corrupt intent to thwart the Russia investigation and to complete this portion of his probe, the people said.

[...]

The president and some of his allies seized on the special counsel’s words as an assurance that Trump’s risk of criminal jeopardy is low.
And I find it very interesting that Trump did not tweet that he's not under criminal investigation when this happened.
Other advisers, however, noted that subjects of investigations can easily become indicted targets — and expressed concern that the special prosecutor was baiting Trump into an interview that could put the president in legal peril.
Lord knows he can be easily baited.

I wonder if this is what precipitated Dowd's resignation.

Dowd told the president the case against him was weak, but warned Trump he could create criminal jeopardy for himself if he agreed to an interview and misspoke under oath, the friend said.

[...]

The president has privately expressed relief at the description of his legal status, which has increased his determination to agree to a special counsel interview, the people said. He has repeatedly told allies that he is not a target of the probe and believes an interview will help him put the matter behind him, friends said.

[...]

Mueller’s investigators have indicated to the president’s legal team that they are considering writing reports on their findings in stages — with the first report focused on the obstruction issue, according to two people briefed on the discussions.
Now that's also interesting, and a possible baiting tactic. Inch by inch, closing in.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, March 22, 2018

Dowd out!

Lordy, I hope he testifies. Too bad it won't be public. If he does, he'll be unable not to leak what he wants us to think happened. Since Mueller's people won't leak, that could lead to some interesting times.

But, hey, Dowd is out!
Dowd stepped down just days after he issued a statement calling for Mueller’s probe to be shuttered, which he first attributed with his title as the president’s lawyer and then backtracked to say he was speaking only for himself.

“I love the president and wish him well,” Dowd said in an email to POLITICO.

  Politico
Do you think he got fired? Or just pissed off?
[T]he 77-year old attorney had grown increasingly frustrated by his work for Trump, according to a source familiar with the Trump legal team strategy. Dowd was particularly upset to learn on Monday that Trump had decided to hire Joseph diGenova, another bulldog lawyer and scandal veteran to help with his Russia response.

[...]

[DiGenova is] a fierce critic of the Russia investigation who earlier this year told Fox News that Trump had been framed by the Justice Department and FBI “with a falsely created crime.”

Trump had also been gauging interest from other prominent attorneys, including former George W. Bush Solicitor General Ted Olson, who recently turned down an offer from Trump by citing conflicts with his law firm.
Yeah, conflicts like: "Fuck NO, this firm will not be representing that idiot!  You want to work for him?  Hang out your own shingle."

It's a sentiment apaprently shared by many. There were earlier reports of several law firms turning down an offer to represent Old Lard Ass.
Olson, Robert Giuffra Jr. and Reid Weingarten were among the elite attorneys who declined job offers from Trump last spring, while former George W. Bush attorneys Bill Burck and Emmet Flood rejected overtures for the position ultimately accepted by Cobb.
And in the case of Ty Cobb...
Washington lawyer Ty Cobb runs the White House’s official response to the investigation with a team of about five aides who draw taxpayer salaries.

The changes to the Trump legal team are seen as a bad omen for Cobb, who has been urging cooperation with Mueller. In an interview on Wednesday, former Cobb law partner Robert Bennett called for Cobb to resign in order to preserve his professional reputation.

“I hope my friend Ty Cobb will leave the team. He’s not helping himself or his reputation,” Bennett said.
No, he's not.
Last December, Dowd took blame for a tweet posted on Trump’s account that appeared to admit Trump was aware that his former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, had lied to the FBI before Trump urged Comey to drop the Russia investigation. The tweet puzzled legal experts who said the admission could fuel an obstruction of justice case against Trump.
Do you suppose he's sorry he put himself out like that now?
Dowd is well-known for his gruff manner, which was on vivid display outside a federal courthouse in 2011 when he told a CNBC camera crew to “get the fuck out of here” before giving the cameraman the middle finger.

Asked recently by POLITICO to comment on talks between the president’s lawyers and Mueller’s investigators, Dowd was only somewhat friendlier: “None of your business,” he said.
He's a real charmer. Too bad he had to go.


UPDATE:



As I was just saying, happens every time.

UPDATE:

Tuesday, February 6, 2018

But what does Sean Hannity advise?

Lawyers for President Trump have advised him against sitting down for a wide-ranging interview with the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, according to four people briefed on the matter, raising the specter of a monthslong court battle over whether the president must answer questions under oath.
  NYT
Oh, yes, this is going to drag on forever - at least until he gets his four years in - unless something drastic happens, like Mueller bringing criminal charges for money laundering. Fingers crossed.
His lawyers are concerned that the president, who has a history of making false statements and contradicting himself, could be charged with lying to investigators.
I'd say the chances of that are about 100%.
Refusing to sit for an interview opens the possibility that Mr. Mueller will subpoena the president to testify before a grand jury, setting up a court fight that would drastically escalate the investigation and could be decided by the Supreme Court.
And that body is no longer reliable. But at least he'd have to go through some lower courts to get there, which presumably would be public.
Presidents have often agreed to speak with federal prosecutors who are investigating their actions or those close to them. But President Richard M. Nixon refused to turn over to the special prosecutor investigating him tapes of incriminating conversations with aides. The matter eventually went before the Supreme Court, which ruled in 1974 that the president, like every American, was not above the law and had to comply with the special prosecutor’s request.
That was a different Supreme Court and a time when most Americans still wanted an honest government.
Rejecting an interview with Mr. Mueller also carries political consequences. It would be certain to prompt accusations that the president is hiding something, and a court fight could prolong the special counsel inquiry, casting a shadow over Republicans as November’s midterm elections approach or beyond into the president’s re-election campaign.

[...]

John Dowd, the longtime Washington defense lawyer hired last summer to represent Mr. Trump in the investigation, wants to rebuff an interview request, as do Mr. Dowd’s deputy, Jay Sekulow, and many West Wing advisers, according to the four people. The lawyers and aides believe the special counsel might be unwilling to subpoena the president and set off a showdown with the White House that Mr. Mueller could lose in court.
If Mueller thinks Trump's testimony is necessary, he'll subpoena. I don't imagine at this point he's worried about losing in court.  He's not reading all these speculatory articles or watching TV news coverage of his investigation.  He's just doing his job.  He'll be getting pretty close to some money laundering charges against the Trump organization, and they're still giving him fuel for his obstruction of justice investigation.
They are convinced that Mr. Mueller lacks the legal standing to question Mr. Trump about some of the matters he is investigating, like the president’s role in providing a misleading response last summer to a New York Times article about a meeting Mr. Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. had with Russians offering dirt on Hillary Clinton. The advisers have also argued that on other matters — like the allegations that the president asked James B. Comey, then the F.B.I. director, to end the investigation into the former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn — the president acted within his constitutional authority and cannot be questioned about acts that were legal.
Do they really believe that, or is that their public face?
One of the few voices arguing for cooperating with Mr. Mueller is Ty Cobb, the White House lawyer whom Mr. Trump also brought on to deal with Mr. Mueller’s investigation. Since Mr. Cobb was hired in July, he has argued that the White House should do everything possible to cooperate with Mr. Mueller’s investigation.
I'm surprised they've kept him around.
“In general,” [said Neal K. Katyal, a partner at the law firm Hogan Lovells], “presidents do sit for interviews or respond to requests from prosecutors because they take their constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws seriously, and running away from a prosecutor isn’t consistent with faithfully executing the laws.”
These are different times. We're in shark-infested waters without a boat, much less a paddle.
The president has bragged to some aides that he would be able to clear himself if he talked to Mr. Mueller’s team.

“I’m looking forward to it, actually,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House last month, though he added, almost as an afterthought, that an interview would be “subject to my lawyers, and all of that.”
That last part is key. His bragging is no different than his bragging about his vast riches while refusing to release his tax returns to prove it.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Every time I see a picture of Dowd...


...I see this great Twilight zone episode: The Masks