Showing posts with label Flake-Jeff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flake-Jeff. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Good ole Mitch

The Senate on Wednesday rejected Sen. Jeff Flake for the third time as he tried to pass a bill to protect special counsel Robert Mueller from being fired by President Trump.

Flake has been pushing for weeks to pass a bill that would keep Trump from firing Mueller before the end of his investigation into Russian election influence.

[...]

On Wednesday, Flake tried again by asking senators to agree unanimously to pass the same bill. But Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said quickly, "I object," which blocked the move.

  Washington Examiner
Honestly, I don't think this bill is as necessary as Flake keeps making it seem. I do think he's making Mitch go on record for blocking it, though.
In late November, Flake was blocked by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said he worried the bill was unconstitutional because it would create a branch of government that isn't answerable to the president.
You mean like the Judicial and Legislative branches?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, November 27, 2018

Wasted leverage


I suppose it would have been too real if he'd made that deal over Kavanaugh's confirmation?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Have I mentioned Mitch McConnell is an SOB?



Well, there's a surprise.

If he won't bring it to a vote, he must be pretty sure it would pass.





Yet, somehow, he couldn't bring himself to vote against the obviously unqualified Kavanaugh.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Friday, November 9, 2018

How long that plane trip to Paris?

He is still freaking out.



I think I can answer that question about never finding Republican votes.  Answer:  Because they don't try to hide their own votes.

That second tweet is just pure malicious bullshit.  I believe we've already ascertained that the Special Counsel doesn't need to be confirmed.

All the ugliness is coming to the large orange surface.  And it's going to get worse.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Is Jeff Flake a liar or an idiot?

Republican Sen. Jeff Flake (Ariz.) said he still isn’t sure he believes Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s denial of sexual assault allegations after voting to confirm the judge earlier this month.

“He was very persuasive,” Flake said during an appearance on ABC’s “The View” on Tuesday.

“I don’t know. I don’t know. I wish I had the certitude that some of my colleagues expressed. But I said on the [Senate] floor before that hearing, we’re likely to leave the hearing with as much doubt as certainty. And that’s how I felt afterwards,” he said.

  The Hill
You think there's a chance he's lying, but you voted to confirm him anyway? Maybe it's best you're stepping down in November.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, October 3, 2018

Senator Collins is a flake

Sen. Susan Collins (R., Maine), one of the crucial Republican swing votes on Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination, told CNN that President Trump’s comments mocking Dr. Ford at a rally Tuesday night were “just plain wrong.” She didn't comment on whether the remarks would affect how she ultimately votes.

  WSJ
No shit.

And speaking of flakes...
Earlier, another Republican swing vote, Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, said he found the comments "kind of appalling."
"Kind of?"

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Monday, October 1, 2018

Jeff Flake: GOP pariah




He says he's talking with colleagues and White House Counsel to fully investigate.  He doesn't answer directly when asked if he'll vote no if they don't.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, September 29, 2018

Flake' explains his decision

I was getting calls and emails for days from friends and acquaintances saying, “Here’s my story, here’s why I was emboldened to come out.” Dr. Ford’s testimony struck a chord, it really did, with a lot of women.

[...]

I didn’t expect it. I mean, we’re getting women writing into the office. People we don’t know. Other offices, I’m told, are having the same experience.

[...]

You know, when I got back to the committee, I saw the food fight again between the parties—the Democrats saying they’re going to walk out, the Republican blaming everything on the Democrats.

And then there was [Democratic Senator] Chris Coons making an impassioned plea for a one-week extension to have an FBI investigation. And you know, if it was anybody else I wouldn’t have taken it as seriously. But I know Chris. We’ve traveled together a lot. We’ve sat down with Robert Mugabe. We’ve been chased by elephants, literally, in Mozambique. We trust each other. And I thought, if we could actually get something like what he was asking for—an investigation limited in time, limited in scope—we could maybe bring a little unity.

We can’t just have the committee acting like this. The majority and minority parties and their staffs just don’t work well together. There’s no trust. In the investigation, they can’t issue subpoenas like they should. It’s just falling apart.

[...]

One, the Supreme Court is the lone institution where most Americans still have some faith.

  The atlantic
I doubt it.
And then the U.S. Senate as an institution—we’re coming apart at the seams. There’s no currency, no market for reaching across the aisle. It just makes it so difficult.

Just these last couple of days—the hearing itself, the aftermath of the hearing, watching pundits talk about it on cable TV, seeing the protesters outside, encountering them in the hall. I told Chris, “Our country’s coming apart on this—and it can’t.” And he felt the same.
It's still coming apart, no matter what happens on this.
I’m a conservative. [Kavanaugh]’s a conservative. I plan to support him unless they turn up something—and they might.

[...]

I’ve felt that this delay is as much to help him as us. My hope is that some Democrats will say “Hey, we may not change our vote, but this process was worthy of the institution, and we feel satisfied.” That means something. The country needs to hear that.
That still doesn't address Kavanaugh's financial mysteries or his lying about using stolen documents and two prior judicial nominations.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Friday, September 28, 2018

Charlie Pierce summarizes the Kavanaugh hearing in three short essays

1.
Senator Lindsey Graham, last seen doing a passable Yosemite Sam imitation all through the halls of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, was positively bubbly as he lined up in front of a cluster of TV cameras near a bank of elevators. The Senate Judiciary Committee had just reported Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination favorably to the full Senate, but not until Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, had wrung from the committee a promise to re-open the FBI background investigation into Kavanaugh for no more than a week.

By all accounts, Flake, who was stopped on his way to the committee room that morning by two survivors of sexual assault, made it quite clear that the votes on Kavanaugh would not be there in the Senate unless his demand was met. That he was not bluffing was made plain after the committee vote when Republican Lisa Murkowski and Democrat Joe Manchin both immediately signed onto the deal. That is what brought Graham to the microphones and the cameras.

"Somebody's got to explain this to Trump," Graham said. "I guess that's up to me."

  Charles P Pierce
To "Trump"? Not "President Trump?" That surely takes away a point on Lindsey's bid for AG.
"Democrats will say, if we do what Jeff said, that would end the process dispute. I don't expect any of them to vote for the guy, but if we ask the FBI to look at what's in front of us, no later than a week, no longer than a week, they would say that would be a better process. That would be progress...You can have the FBI, the CIA and the Foreign Legion, but you know what you know, and you've heard what you're gonna hear. But having said that, this is called democracy."
Still high from his earlier rant? Because I'm finding that a bit garbley.
El Caudillo Del Mar-A-Lago was uncharacteristically muted—which, I will grant you, has proven ominous in the past—and compliant with the committee's actions.

[...]

According to a statement from the Judiciary Committee released late Friday afternoon, the renewed FBI probe cannot last longer than a week and will concern only what the statement calls "current credible allegations against the nominee."

There's a lot of ozone in that sentence, to be sure. There are currently at least three allegations against the nominee, and their credibility is purely a subjective matter. What the committee plainly means is that the FBI should only look into Dr. Ford's allegations. Even so, it was significant that, after the deal was announced on Friday, the lawyer for his elusive high-school sidekick, Mark Judge, said that Judge would cooperate with the FBI. In addition, earlier this week, the lawyer for Judge's former girlfriend, who has said that Judge confessed to her that he'd been involved with the gang rape of a girl when he had been in high school, also said she'd be willing to talk to the FBI. None of these developments would seem to be good news for Mark Kavanaugh.
It's good that they're saying they're willing to talk to the FBI. But even if they weren't willing, I don't think they get the choice, unless they're willing to go to prison.
The odds in favor of [Kavanaugh's] ultimate confirmation have dropped, but, for the moment, that's still the way to bet. But there's enough hedging in it now to landscape a golf course.
I would have agreed until the FBI got called back in. I'm no longer sure I'd bet on it.

2.
Stars and Stripes [...] had a story [Friday morning] about how the senior enlisted advisor to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is under serious investigation by the Defense Department's inspector general for "a complaint of alleged misconduct."

[...]

The military doesn't accept spittle-flecked, half-mad tirades as dispositive evidence. The military has its own problems with sexual assault, and obstruction, and all the usual crimes and offenses. But, in these two cases anyway, it is plainly cleaning up after itself. Go back through history and take a look at what happens to republics when the military becomes the most trusted institution in the government. Nothing good, is what happens.

The military doesn't accept spittle-flecked, half-mad tirades as dispositive evidence. The military has its own problems with sexual assault, and obstruction, and all the usual crimes and offenses. But, in these two cases anyway, it is plainly cleaning up after itself. Go back through history and take a look at what happens to republics when the military becomes the most trusted institution in the government. Nothing good, is what happens.

[...]

In plain terms, for all his spleen and outrage, Judge Kavanaugh lies about everything. In his earlier hearings, he lied about his judicial philosophy, and he lied about his days as a Republican operative, both in and out of the White House. On Monday, he lied to Martha McCallum of Fox News. On Thursday, he lied about his entire adolescence and his college days.

He lied even when he didn't have to lie. He lied in preposterous ways easily disproven by common sense. (The "Devil's Triangle"? "Renate Alumnius"?) He lied like a toddler, like a guilty adolescent, and like a privileged scion of the white ruling class, which is a continuum with which we all are far too familiar. He lied and he dared the Democratic members of the committee, and the country, to call him on his lies.

[...]

And, an update: Intriguingly, the scheduled Sunday debate between Beto O'Rourke and Ted Cruz in Houston has been postponed. The stated reason? Cruz "will be in Washington, D.C. for weekend votes." The railroad is picking up


  Charles P Pierce

3.
There are two things I know now for certain, having watched Judge Brett Kavanaugh perform the Bud Light King Lear he performed for the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. The first is that, having watched him in high dudgeon, I don't want to be around him when he has, as the auld wans say, drink taken. Especially at the beginning of his session, he gave every indication that he would very much be the angry, belligerent inebriate that many of his college friends have said he is. He's the guy from whom you move to the other end of the bar rather than engage.

And second, and probably ultimately more important, the Hour of Angry White Male Rage is far from passing out of our politics. This was manifested not only in Kavanaugh's angry truculence with Democratic members of the committee, but also by the mid-session defenestration of Rachel Mitchell, the Arizona prosecutor who handled all the questioning for the Republicans when Dr. Christine Blasey Ford was on the stand, and who was handling all the questioning of Kavanaugh until she asked him about one specific entry in his beloved calendar—the one for July 1, 1982, that read:

Tobin's house -- workout. Go to Jimmy's for 'Skis with Judge, Tom, PJ, Bernie, and Squi.

  Charles P Pierce
And that's when Kavanaugh asked for a break. Or that's when Grassley said Kavanaugh asked for a break. They took a break, and when they came back, Ms. Mitchell had indeed been defenestrated, Lindsey Graham did his Yosemite Sam for the cameras, for Trump and for Kavanaugh, and no one mentioned that suddenly the Republican members were back in the driver's seat.
There was a certain interest in this entry, because it conforms to the timeframe of Dr. Ford's allegation and, pretty obviously, "'Skis" was short for "brewskis." Equally obviously, "Judge" was the notoriously elusive Mark Judge, whom all the Democrats want to get under oath, and whom all the Republicans want to send to Neptune. (He's already in Delaware, after all.) Mitchell was gently leading Kavanaugh to deny the possibility that the July 1 entry referred to the gathering at which Ford alleges she was attacked.

[...]

[W]hen she edged up against the possibility of what may have happened on that long ago day in July, it was time for her to go. The Hour of Angry White Male Rage had come 'round at last. And Lindsey Graham was its proud herald.

Graham had already had a televised nutty at the lunch break and, once Mitchell was shuffled out of the way, he proceeded to signal to all his Republican colleagues that it was time to let the freak flag fly.

[...]

This was the old Huckleberry, the fire-eyed house manager of the impeachment of Bill Clinton, before his Chang-and-Eng act with the late John McCain took some of his edge off him. Back in the late 1990s, of course, Graham was hunting presidential privates—and, of course, Brett Kavanaugh was practicing all the things he deplored Thursday on behalf of Ken Starr, and leaking his brains out while he was doing so. (His lachrymose bellowing about the toll his family has paid over these 10 days of "hell" is pretty rich when you consider all the lives he and the rest of those merry men shredded in Washington and Arkansas, and even richer when you recall that it was Kavanaugh who insisted that President Bill Clinton be questioned in the most prurient way possible when Clinton finally sat for a deposition.) Sooner or later, please god, the 1990s will be over.

Anyway, while Graham cued up his fellow Republican committee members for the rest of the afternoon, it was Kavanaugh himself, with his raving opening statement, that first cleared the decks for them. On Wednesday, he released a set of "prepared remarks" that pretty plainly were a feint. What emerged on Thursday was a stunning outburst of wounded privilege and raging contempt for people who would deny him that to which he was entitled.

[...]

The charges are not "last minute [as Kavanaugh claimed in his opening statement]." There is no clock on this thing. I don't know how often we have to point this out. It was hard on Kavanaugh's family, but he's still living at home and, no matter how this turns out, he's going to have a sinecure in the federal judiciary.
I thought this, too. But it's conceivable that if the FBI investigation provides something near to confirming that Kavanaugh did what Dr. Ford is claiming (and that July 1 entry might be the key), then I think it's possible someone will bring charges or impeachment proceedings against his current seat on the Appellate Court. And, what if he actually did rape someone at some point? And that woman has proof, or lots of corroboration?
But it was this next bit that really opened the door on who this guy is.
This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record, revenge on behalf of the Clintons, and millions of dollars and money from outside left-wing opposition groups. This is a circus. The consequences will extend long past my nomination. The consequences will be with us for decades. This grotesque and coordinated character assassination will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions from serving our country, and as we all know, in the United States political system of the early 2000s, what goes around, comes around.
Frankly, this was as lunatic as it was fraudulent. I think we can stipulate that as much outside money has been spent promoting Kavanaugh's nomination as fighting against it. That, alas, is part of our politics now, thanks partly to Kavanaugh's old mentor, Anthony Kennedy. Much later, when Senator Cory Booker pinned him on whether or not he thought Dr. Ford was part of a "calculated and orchestrated political hit," Kavanaugh as much as crawled under the table. He smarmily retreated to the notion that something really bad may have happened to Ford, but that his alleged grinding on her while Mark Judge giggled and turned up the stereo wasn't it. And "revenge on behalf of the Clintons"?

[...]

Oh, and that threat right there at the end? The going around and the coming around. He will overturn Roe now, not merely because he thinks it's bad law, but because the circus made him do it. He will have his revenge on all these drones who put him and the kids through this "hell," and it will come from the highest court in the land. This, I guarantee you.
He can't overturn Roe on his own, but I take Charlie's point. This is a dangerous, vengeful POS to have on the Supreme Court.
With the Democratic members of the committee, Kavanaugh remained an enraged, entitled twerp through the whole long day. There was his interchange with Senator Amy Klobuchar, in which, after she asked him about his alleged blackout drinking, Kavanaugh sneered, "Have you?" If any ordinary person had treated a sitting United States Senator with that kind of virulent disrespect, they'd have been hauled off in irons. [...] I suspect it played pretty well in MAGA precincts outside the Potomac. But what I also know is that Brett Kavanaugh is now far more dangerous a nominee for the Supreme Court than he was when the day began. He will be a wrathful judge. He pretty much said so, and his supporters on the committee enthusiastically encouraged it.

[...]

But the memory I have is that of poor Rachel Mitchell, who flew all the way out here to try and do the best she could in an impossible job that she freely accepted, gently pushing her way out of the committee room as the Hour of Angry White Male Rage receded all around her.

"What happened?" I asked her.

"Excuse me, " she answered. "I have to get out of here now."

Jeff Flake's conversion



video



video

Have I said before what a colossal ass Chuck Grassley is?





video

The Judiciary Committee has voted

From The Guardian:



Not sure that's exactly quoted correctly.

President Trump on Friday called the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault a “credible witness” and deferred to the Senate on whether to delay a vote on his confirmation.

The president's remarks came after Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) joined other Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee in voting to advance Kavanaugh’s nomination to the full Senate.

[...]

“I will be totally reliant on what [Judiciary Chairman Chuck] Grassley [R-Iowa] and the group decides to do,” Trump said. “They have to do what they think is right. They have to be comfortable with themselves.”

[...]

“I thought her testimony was very compelling and she looks like a very fine woman to me,” Trump said Friday, following a meeting with Chilean President Sebastian Pinera at the White House. “I thought that Brett’s testimony, likewise, was really something that I haven’t seen before, it was incredible,” Trump said. “I think it will work out very well for the country.”

  The Hill

Kavanaugh - and anyone else who still thinks Trump can be loyal - should take a hint: when he assured you he was backing you just before your testimony on Thursday, he was as sincer as you were in your testimony.



And there's still shit coming in that will get aired before the full Senate vote.  We'll see when that happens, just how craven the Republicans can be.



He says he'll vote to advance with the understanding the FBI will investigate (limited to one week).  

Why doesn't this mean there will be an investigation since there were 11 GOP and 10 Dems on the Judiciary Committee?

McConnell, that's why.  Have I mentioned lately that McConnell is a loathsome dick?
McConnell has not announced a decision on the request for a delay.

Flake's declaration that he would not vote in favor of Kavanaugh's confirmation "until the FBI has done more investigation than they have already" is significant.

Along with Maine Sen. Susan Collins and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, he is one of the three Republican swing votes on Kavanaugh's confirmation. If all Democrats and two Republicans oppose Kavanaugh, he cannot be confirmed.

  CNN
But they'll be getting a shitload of pressure. Including from George W Bush.
[T]he GOP's current plan is to hold a procedural vote on the Senate floor midday Saturday and hold the final vote early next week.

[...]

Two Republicans -- Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska -- and two Democrats in red states -- Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota -- now essentially hold the future of Kavanaugh's nomination in their hands. A third undecided Democrat, Sen. Joe Donnelly of Indiana, announced his opposition to Kavanaugh late Friday morning. Donnelly was one of three Democratic senators who voted for Trump's first Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Two Democrats? They need to think very hard about what they're doing.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:

Senate Republicans said Friday they had agreed to ask the FBI to investigate sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, a move that will temporarily delay his nomination.

  The Hill
I hope Kavanaugh is choking on it.

Thursday, September 27, 2018

Dont count on Jeff Flake

"I do not know how I will assess the credibility of these witnesses—these human beings—on the grave matters that will be testified to, because I have not yet heard a word of their testimony, and because I am not psychic. I am not gifted with clairvoyance. Given these limitations, I will have to listen to the testimony before I make up my mind about the testimony. What I do know is that I don't believe that Dr. Ford is part of some kind of vast conspiracy from start to finish to smear Judge Kavanaugh, as has been alleged by some on the right. And what I do know is that I don't believe that Judge Kavanaugh is some kind of serial sexual predator, as has been alleged by some on the left."
As someone pointed out, at this point, if the building was burning down, Flake would express great sympathy for both the structure and the flames.

  Charles P Pierce

Monday, July 16, 2018

The Helsinki fiasco

Raise your hand if you thought it would be any different than it was.

I didn't think so.






Paul Ryan needs to be told in no uncertain terms that he is at the top of the list of Trump enablers, and it's just a little goddamned late to act scandalized by Trump's behavior.  TRUMP is not our ally.  And the GOP is complicit.

Ditto Mike Murphy.  Like you expected something else??  You Republicans own this.  And you're the only ones who can do anything about it.



Ditto Lindsey Graham.



It's imperative that Congress start impeachment proceedings, Lindsey, before he gives the country away.

Ditto Abby Huntsman and Fox News.



It is if you're Donald Trump and the negotiation is for Trump businesses in Russia.  Also, Russian mob issues.

And a fucking soccer ball.




Guardian summary points:




"Putin did not deny."


Trump said: “If they had it, it would have been out long ago.”

That was the last question of the press conference, which has ended.

  The Guardian
Of course it wouldn't.  Once it gets out, it can't be used for blackmail any more.
The AP’s Jonathan Lemire asks Trump to warn Putin never to intervene in a US election again in front of the cameras.

Trump speaks extensively about FBI servers and asks about Hillary Clinton’s emails.
He wouldn't even suggest that Putin shouldn't intervene. This is truly outrageous.

And you know how much Trump worships strong, powerful men.

And here's what they spent most of their time together on, I am willing to bet:



All in the same mobbed up boat as Trump, no doubt.




And what good will it do?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:




Gee, I wonder which he'll choose.

UPDATE:



So what do you think Peter King will do about it?  Let me guess:  not a damned thing.  Maybe "tweet angrily and then go lie down."

Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Keeping score

Aside from Jeff Sessions, Trump keeps score on who hasn't been loyal.  Well, somebody keeps score for him.



Many of President Trump’s political aides made it a priority to ensure that the Tennessean, who has accused the president of “debasing” the country with his “untruths” and “name-calling,” did not reenter the race. So they went straight to the one person with the ability to give Corker a new lease on his political life: Trump himself.

They frequently reminded the president of Corker’s criticism, at times even providing specific examples. They kept folders documenting the attacks from Corker and other Trump detractors.

[...]

On Tuesday, Corker announced that he would not run, ending a stretch of uncertainty that put the Republican Party on edge.

[...]

Corker’s decision ensures one thing: Trump’s two most vocal Senate Republican critics will be gone from the chamber next year, barring further surprises. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who has lambasted Trump, is also retiring.

[...]

The White House has also distributed lengthy surveys asking candidates to explain why they like the president and the president’s agenda.

  WaPo
Christ.  Banana Republicans.
Looking ahead to the fall midterm stretch run, the senior White House official said, Trump hopes to be on the road as “often as four or five times as week.”
And if any Republican into whose territory he wanders thinks he's going to do anything but perform a campaign speech for his own re-election in 2020, they're going to be sorely disappointed.

In the case of California, it's an entire state he's punishing.




He doesn't have to make sense to feel like he's successfully punishing someone.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

What a flake


All you've got for your country is $100.00?  Tell me again how much money you make, Senator Flake.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

You knew he wasn't finished slamming Jeff Flake


I'd say that tweet is about 50-50 for the need to slam Flake and to brag.

Surely he's not done nasty tweeting about Jeff Flake

Flake, a key Republican critic of Trump, said he was retiring at the end of his term in 2018 because there was no room for him in the party under the current president’s stewardship. He then delivered an emotional appeal from the Senate floor against the state of affairs under Trump, bemoaning that his Republican colleagues had “given in or given up on core principles in favor of a more viscerally satisfying anger and resentment”.

  
What principles? Power and greed have been the guiding lights for Republicans for decades.
“There are times when we must risk our careers in favor of our principles. Now is such a time.

“We must never allow ourselves to lapse into thinking that that is just the way things are now,” he added. “We must stop pretending that the degradation of our politics and the conduct of some in our executive branch are normal.”
But of course they are.
“Reckless, outrageous, and undignified behavior has become excused and countenanced as ‘telling it like it is’ when it is actually just reckless, outrageous, and undignified.”
I'll grant him that.
“When the next generation asks us: ‘Why didn’t you do something? Why didn’t you speak up? What are we going to say?’”
The next generation of Republicans is never ever going to ask that.
Flake was a co-author of a comprehensive immigration reform bill in 2013 that would have provided a pathway to citizenship for roughly 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the US. He also differed from Trump on trade, but ultimately told the Arizona Republic newspaper his decision to leave the Senate was a moral choice.

[...]

Flake was one of the few Republican senators who declined to endorse Trump during the 2016 presidential election. Earlier this year, he published a book framing the rise of Trump as a moment of reckoning for the Republican party.
So that, at least puts him on firmer ground.  But, he was in on the ridiculous repeal and replace fiasco, and he's been a true Republican on the road to Trumpism.  It's hard not to think of his "retirement" as a way out without losing the next round of Arizona elections in 2018.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, played into the intra-party rift by dubbing Flake’s decision as “a good move” while telling reporters his remarks were not “befitting of the Senate floor”.
You're supposed to do your nasty work on Twitter.
Political operatives in Washington were surprised by Flake’s announcement, which followed a slew of similar decisions from Republicans in swing states.

Several Republicans serving in the House of Representatives have announced plans to retire, including David Trott of Michigan, David Reichert of Washington, Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, leaving an opening for Democrats in competitive districts.
If only the Democrats were up to the challenge.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:
Jeff Flake believes that the way to reassert the balance of power between the national legislature and a national executive with a narcissistic crackpot at the helm is to get the hell out of Dodge before the roof caves in. Good profile, lacks courage.

  Charles P Pierce
UPDATE 7:30 am:

Nope. He wasn't done.

Aaaaand there it is

They couldn't keep him from naming names very long.


A love fest!  Jesus, what a ridiculous POS.

The "love fest" is between him and the mirror.

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Expect Trump tweets on "Little Jeff Flake" who couldn't hack it

And who didn't even have the nerve to say Lord Voldemort's name.



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.