Thursday, April 2, 2026
The last thing they want is peace
Also, he says over the next two to three weeks. Just yesterday (wasn't it?) he said, when asked how long until he ends the war, two weeks.
And, just what the everlasting fuck is this?
Just a brilliant idea. Any volunteers?
Like so many, the older he gets, the more insane he becomes.
To the moon, Alice
That whole thing was either thrown together in a rush, or they've been planning something behind our backs. There was hardly any media coverage about it, and then all of a sudden, it happened. Prelude to disclosure? Getting their marching orders from the lizard people? No, they're underground. Who's on the moon? I forget. Hopefully someone to give our earthly leaders an ultimatum.
"May be"
It wouldn't surprise me if Trump holds onto her simply because this was reported in the NYT.
And maybe, he's getting rid of all the women.
This one, I think, is quite likely.
I couldn't think why Bondi, though, because she sucks up to him constantly and is a hateful human being.
This is how the Times reports it:
What does he want her to do with them? Destroy them?President Trump has discussed firing Attorney General Pam Bondi in recent days as he grows frustrated with her leadership at the Justice Department and her handling of the Epstein files, according to four people familiar with the conversations.
Mr. Trump has floated the idea of replacing Ms. Bondi with Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the people said.
[...]
Ms. Bondi’s allies pointed to photos of her and the president traveling to the Supreme Court on Wednesday to dispute the notion that the president is planning to fire her.
“Attorney General Pam Bondi is a wonderful person and she is doing a good job,” Mr. Trump said in a statement to The New York Times.
[...]
But the president has been souring on Ms. Bondi for months. Among his top complaints is Ms. Bondi’s handling of the Epstein files, which has become a political liability for Mr. Trump among his supporters.
NYT
Is Stephen Miller available?He has also complained about her shortcomings as a communicator and vented about what he sees as the department’s lack of aggressiveness in going after his foes.
Pam is scheduled for House Oversight subpoenaed testimony April 14. We'll see if it happens, and if it does, whether she does anything other than she's done before: snipe and snarl.
Wednesday, April 1, 2026
Trump is Vincenzo Pentangeli
Nobody tell Trump. Just because he was there doesn't mean he understood what was happening. He only thought his presence would be enough to intimidate the justices. After a couple of recent rejections from SCOTUS in cases and his public berating of them, I guess he thought they'd get with the program if he showed up in person.On Wednesday, Donald Trump became the first sitting president to attend Supreme Court arguments in person. It must have been a brutal morning for him. The justices heard Trump v. Barbara, a challenge to the executive order purporting to strip birthright citizenship from the children of many immigrants—and it quickly shaped up to be a blowout against the administration. Seven justices expressed profound skepticism toward the government’s revisionist history of the 14th Amendment, with most sounding downright hostile toward the pseudo-originalist theory cooked up to legitimize the policy. Only Justices Clarence Thomas and Sanuel Alito asked questions friendly to the administration, and none of their colleagues sounded persuaded by their strained defenses.
Slate
In the Godfather movies, there was a scene in a trial where one of the mafia members was about to rat on the stand, and Michael Corleone had the guy's brother - Vincenzo Pentangeli - flown in from Italy to sit in the audience and remind his brother Frank of his oath to the brotherhood. It worked. Trump is Vincenzo Pentangeli.
UPDATE 02:55 pm: Somebody told him.
All he wanted to do was show himself to "his" judges. He did not intend to stay.
Reminding us that this very question has already been asked and answered at the Supreme Court.
Seems kind of fitting that the defense is argued by an Asian American.
Well, that should help.
I expect there are a lot of Republicans who fit this bill. The Supreme Court will not mess with birthright citizenship. They will reconfirm it for the umpteenth time. Can we please put this to rest once and for all?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)