Thursday, February 11, 2021

Cleaning up after Trump

When Joe Biden took office, he inherited the largest backlog of unresolved clemency cases in U.S. history: 14,000 people waiting to find out if their convictions would be erased or sentences reduced, or if they’d get any answer at all.

Many of those 14,000 have languished in the system for years after Biden’s predecessor, Donald Trump, largely bypassed the century-old process for reviewing cases and instead granted pardons based on advice from politically connected friends, high-priced lobbyists and TV celebrities.

Biden’s White House counsel’s office has started to reach out to attorneys and advocates for suggestions on reforms, what could be done about the backlog, and mistakes they believe were made in previous administrations, according to the people familiar with the conversations.

[...]

A former Obama aide said that while Biden’s team is familiar with the clemency problems it faces, it has been too busy with nominations, executive orders and proposed legislation, including those designed to tackle the coronavirus pandemic and cratered economy.

“They couldn’t have had time to formulate a plan,” the person said.

  Politico
Also...


The Biden administration has so many Trump messes to clean up, they need an army of cleaners.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Evil bastard


"From his dining room."  The bastard was stuffing his face and watching it on TV, while the Capitol was under seige and people's lives were in danger. Not to mention the cops being overrun. 

Persona non grata in New York

Members of a New York State Assembly panel voted Wednesday to advance a bill that if passed and signed into law would rename Donald J. Trump State Park in Upstate New York.

The state legislature's tourism committee voted 14-7 to advance the bill. Democrats in the state legislature have long pushed to rename the 436-acre park in Putnam County, which has been largely unused since 2015.

"Our parklands should be reflective of New Yorkers that we can be proud of, New Yorkers that have expressed our values,” said Assemblywoman Nily Rozic (D), who sponsored the bill, Politico reported. “There are a lot of other New Yorkers who are worthy of the honor of having a park named after themselves.”

The state obtained the land in 2006 when Trump donated it after intending to build a golf course on the property but never doing so. When Trump donated the property, he did so on the condition his name be “prominently displayed at least at each entrance to each property.” “This is my way of trying to give back,” Trump reportedly said at the time.

  The Hill
Ha! He got a tax write-off and his name plastered on something.
Danny O’Donnell, who chairs the tourism committee, told Politico he does not foresee any legal challenges from Trump to the park's name being changed.

“I don’t think [Trump] will have the resources to care when the time comes,” O’Donnell told the outlet. “But maybe he would; he’s sufficiently a narcissist.”
I think you can count on it.
Trump has long rebuffed changes to the state park, threatening to reclaim it.
Exhibit A.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Is the worst cyber attack on the US going down the memory hole?

In December 2020, a U.S. cybersecurity company announced it had recently uncovered a massive cyber breach. The hack dates back to March 2020, and possibly even earlier, when an adversary, believed to be Russia, hacked into the computer networks of U.S. government agencies and private companies via SolarWinds, a security software used by many thousands of organizations in the U.S. and around the world.

New York Times cyber security reporter Nicole Perlroth calls the SolarWinds hack "one of the biggest intelligence failures of our time."

"We really don't know the extent of it," Perlroth says. "What we know is that this thing has hit the Department of Homeland Security — the very agency charged with keeping us safe — the Treasury, the State Department, the Justice Department, the Department of Energy, some of the nuclear labs, the Centers for Disease Control."

Perlroth says the fact that the breach went undetected for so long means that the hackers likely planted "back door" code, which would allow them to re-enter the systems at a later date.

"We're still trying to figure out where those back doors are," Perlroth says. "And that could take months, if not years, to get to the bottom of."

[...]

"We are one of the most advanced, if not the most advanced cyber superpower in the world, but we are also its most targeted and its most vulnerable," she says.

Part of the problem, Perlroth says, is that the U.S. has spent more energy on hacking other countries than on defending itself.

[...]

SolarWinds, the cyber security company through which the hackers entered, which used the password "solarwinds123".

  NPR
Jesus Chriat.
"When I started calling up some of the victims of this attack, many of them didn't even know they used SolarWinds software until it came out that the company was breached. ... So what we were looking at really was a company that didn't have very good security, but that was touching some of the most sensitive systems we have. This was used inside the Pentagon. The NSA used that. We know that the Treasury used it and all the other victims that are coming out, including our utility companies.

[...]

"Originally when this hack was discovered, one of the bright spots was that they believed that the hackers had not made their way into classified systems. But what I kept hearing from security researchers and people who worked at these agencies was just how much vulnerable data was outside these classified systems. And one of those things was Black Start.

"Black Start is just a very technical document. And it's essentially a to-do list. If we were able to have a major power failure, it says, you know, we're going to go turn on the power here first, then we're going to move over here and do this. And with that document in hand, that could be very valuable for an adversary because it would essentially give them the perfect hit list to make sure that the power stayed off."

On a recent cyber attack on the water supply in Oldsmar, Fla., in which hackers attempted to increase the amount of lye in the drinking water

[...]

"This is really dangerous. You know, they increased the amount of lye in the water from 100 parts per million to 11,000 parts per million. It just so happened that there happened to be a software engineer sitting at his computer watching his cursor move around on his screen and then later watched someone go into these functions and upped the amount of chemical.

[...]

"I think it's just a wake-up call in general that a lot of these facilities allow contractors and engineers to get in, get remote access from miles away or across the country. And I think we need to start rethinking that access. Do we really want strangers being able to get into these systems from afar? And I think right now would be a good time to ask ourselves. And I think the answer is probably no."
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Ebola resurgence in Africa


The border

Biden has left in place a Trump-era, COVID-19 order called Title 42 that allows US authorities to rapidly expel to Mexico migrants caught crossing the border illegally.

Carol Rose, executive director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, which filed a new lawsuit over the policy on Monday, said it uses a “guise” of public health to undermine legal protections for asylum seekers.

“Our fight for these families continues, until and unless the Biden administration ends this cruel practice once and for all,” Rose said in a statement.

This is not the first time that officials in the Biden administration have stressed that the US will continue to maintain tight control over its southern border.

Last week, Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced the immediate suspension of agreements with Central American nations that allowed the Trump administration to send asylum seekers back to those countries.

In a statement, Blinken said, however, that the suspension of the agreements with Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala does “not mean that the U.S. border is open”.

“While we are committed to expanding legal pathways for protection and opportunity here and in the region, the United States is a country with borders and laws that must be enforced,” he said.

  alJazeera
Then maybe we should be offering Mexico assistance patroling its border towns to protect refugees crowded into dangerous conditions where they're subject to violent attacks.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Jackie Speier understands the danger of the Trump cult

On 6 January, Jackie Speier was one of scores of members of Congress threatened by the mob of violent Trump supporters and white supremacists who stormed the US Capitol in an attempt to overthrow the results of the presidential election.

Along with her peers, she was told to wear a gas mask and ordered to lie prostrate on the marble floor as the baying crowd pounded on the chamber door and the sound of gunfire rent the air. The terror of that day induced in her a flashback, to the events that brought her into politics in the first place when she lay bleeding from five gunshot wounds in the Guyana jungle, not knowing whether she would live or die.

It was 18 November 1978, and she had travelled to Guyana as part of a congressional investigation into the Jonestown settlement and its cult leader, Jim Jones. The fact-finding group of 24 were ambushed by cult members on a jungle airstrip; the congressman for whom Speier then worked, Leo Ryan, and four others were murdered.

Speier, shot five times and left for dead, had to wait 22 hours for help to arrive. She told herself as she lay on the tarmac that if she survived the ordeal she would devote herself to public service.

[...]

The formative experience that gave rise to her political career gives Speier an unusually sharp perspective on the danger posed by the Capitol insurrection. She thinks of it as “groupthink”, saying that “when the groupthink is about overthrowing the government, then we’ve got a serious problem.”

[...]

“Jim Jones was a religious cult leader, Donald Trump is a political cult leader,” Speier told the Guardian. “As a victim of violence and of a cult leader, I am sensitive to conduct that smacks of that. We have got to be wary of anyone who can have such control over people that they lose their ability to think independently.”

[...]

Last month she wrote to Joe Biden and his newly confirmed defense secretary, Lloyd Austin, calling for a “new sense of urgency” following the “appalling events at the Capitol”.

In her letter, Speier told the president and defense secretary that she had become “increasingly alarmed” about the connections between violent extremist groups and military personnel. She warned them that current efforts to contain the problem were “insufficient to the threat from these extremist movements”.

[...]

A recent analysis by CNN of the first 150 people to be arrested for participating in the Capitol insurrection found that at least 21 had military experience. Some were still serving, and eight were former marines with elite training in the art of warfare.

[...]

“An Air Force Academy graduate was identified in his early life as an excellent military leader who rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel, and here he is on the Senate floor holding zip-tie handcuffs.”

Prosecutors said Brock’s handcuffs were intended to take hostages.

Following the 2020 hearing that Speier convened as chair of the military personnel subcommittee, she proposed the creation of a standalone offense of violent extremism under the uniform code of military justice. The Pentagon supported the idea, but it was squashed at the insistence of Trump and with resistance from Republicans in the US Senate.

Now she plans to reintroduce the proposal into this year’s National Defense Authorization Act.

[...]

Under the existing military code, service members have to be “active” participants in an extremist group to be disciplined.

[...]

“So you’ve got a problem with lackadaisical enforcement of a law that allows you to be a participant in a white supremacist group, you just can’t be an ‘active’ participant.”

  
Just what does it take to be considered "active"?
Speier is urging Biden to use his executive powers to identify white supremacy and extremism as a specific threat within the military. She also wants him to sign an executive order that would ensure that all military recruits and those seeking top security clearances are screened for signs of violent extremist activity on their social media accounts.

[...]

Speier said that all these measures were needed urgently even before 6 January. Trump’s open dialogue with extremist organizations had supercharged the need for action, she said.

“Donald Trump had a code for talking to these groups. ‘There’s good people on both sides,’ ‘We love you,’ ‘You’re special.’ He recognized that they were valuable to him, and they recognized that he could amplify their recruiting. It was a toxic brew of personal gain, and it put at risk the entire democracy of this country.”

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Pathetic and disgusting


Bullshit, they were not.  And no other events have any bearing, unless they provide evidence of Trump's incitement of THIS insurrection and his dereliction of duty to protect and stop it.

Why am I not surprised?


Impeachment trial #2

Stacey Plackett listed a number of facts directly connecting Trump to the plans to storm the Capitol that I had not seen.  


(This is not her full speech, and I will replace it when I find the full coverage.)


Agreed.


That was a surprise to me, too.

Looks like it might have been a surprise to lots of folks, and I'm willing to be it is a surprise to many Republican Senators.


Also...


UPDATE:


My guess is they won't spend any time defending it.  They'll stick to the whole impeachment being "unconstitutional".

UPDATE:
On Sunday, The Washington Post walked through evidence collected by federal investigators in which those involved in storming the Capitol linked their actions to Trump’s desires. Others had said as much to media outlets before their arrests. But what the existing evidentiary record shows is that attention turned to the 6th only after Trump highlighted it. It wasn’t just that people came that day because of Trump, it’s that the day didn’t become a focus of attention until Trump highlighted it.

[...]

A review of charging documents compiled by the department doesn’t indicate that any of those arrested in the storming of the Capitol had identified Jan. 6 as a date for travel to D.C. In fact, several of the documents show that plans changed only after Trump identified the date.

[...]

Organizations focused on promoting rallies in Washington on Jan. 6 began to do so only after Trump’s initial tweet.

[...]

On Dec. 13, for example, the website for the group Stop the Steal was promoting a rally in Washington held the day before. It wasn’t until Dec. 20 that the main page of the site promoted the Jan. 6 event. The day prior, its website showed no information about a rally in Washington. On Jan. 2, Trump retweeted a message promoting the rally near the White House, organized by an activist associated with the website TrumpMarch.com. It had put together a bus tour in November and early December to champion Trump’s false claims about the election. As of Dec. 18, the day of Trump’s first tweet, the site was still promoting the end of that tour. By Dec. 23, it had shifted to a bus tour ending in D.C. on Jan. 6.

  WaPo

UPDATE:


It is such a travesty that Jamie Harrison did not defeat Lindsey Graham in November.