Showing posts with label freedom of speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom of speech. Show all posts

Friday, February 13, 2026

Some good news

In a critical loss for the Justice Department, a federal grand jury on Tuesday refused to indict Democratic lawmakers who made a video reminding members of the military and intelligence community that they can refuse to carry out illegal orders.

  Mother Jones
Doesn't mean they'll drop it, but it's a good start.
The six Democrats featured in the 90-second clip are Sens. Elissa Slotkin (Mich.) and Mark Kelly (Ariz.), and Reps. Jason Crow (Colo.), Chris Deluzio (Pa.), Maggie Goodlander (N.H.), and Chrissy Houlahan (Pa.)—and they all served in the military or intelligence agencies. The indictment was sought by DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, who is a longtime ally of President Donald Trump and a former Fox News host.
Judge Box of Wine is what I hear her called sometimes.
The video, which was posted back in November, was met with an avalanche of threats and attempted retaliation from President Donald Trump, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and—now—Pirro and the DOJ.

[...]

In early January, Hegseth censured Kelly, alleging that the retired Navy combat pilot and astronaut had engaged in “seditious” conduct. Kelly quickly sued Hegseth for violating his constitutional rights.
And, yesterday, a judge ruled in that case.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon (a George W Bush nominee) ruled that Pentagon officials not only violated Kelly’s First Amendment free speech rights, but they also “threatened the constitutional liberties of millions of military retirees.” The judge invoked an old-fashioned rebuke -- “Horsefeathers!” -- in response to the government’s claim that Kelly is trying to exempt himself from the rules of military justice.

[...]

Leon’s order prohibits the Pentagon from implementing or enforcing Kelly’s punishment while his lawsuit is pending. The judge instructed the parties to provide him with an update in 30 days.

[...]

[A] Washington grand jury declined to indict the lawmakers over the video.

[...]

Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin has said she has been told the Justice Department could seek a new indictment as soon as Friday. Kelly and Slotkin said at a news conference Wednesday that they are keeping all legal options on the table regarding potentially suing the administration.

[...]

[DOD chief Pete] Hegseth said Kelly’s censure was “a necessary process step” to proceedings that could result in a demotion from the senator’s retired rank of captain and subsequent reduction in retirement pay.

[...]

Hegseth said the government will appeal Leon’s decision. “Sedition is sedition, ‘Captain,’” he posted on his X account, referring to Kelly by his rank at retirement.

  AP News
What a dunce.
The Pentagon began investigating Kelly in late November, citing a federal law that allows retired service members to be recalled to active duty on orders of the defense secretary for possible court-martial or other punishment. Hegseth has said Kelly was the only one of the six lawmakers to be investigated because he is the only one who formally retired from the military and still falls under the Pentagon’s jurisdiction.

[...]

[Judge] Leon said that Kelly “is likely to succeed on the merits” of his free speech claim. “He has also shown irreparable harm, and the balance of the equities fall decidedly in his favor.”


UPDATE 02/24/2026:


 

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

No police necessary

 It's freedom of speech.  And I'm not being snarky.  It is.


It's just good Rep Dave Taylor got outed.



UPDATE 10/16/2025:




Tuesday, September 16, 2025

Irony is alive and well in GOP circles

 

Of course she doesn't mean "anyone".  She's talking about Charlie Kirk.



Let there be lawsuits

 


GOP irony

 


Three months later...



Fascists deifying Charlie Kirk

 




Hatch Act violation?
President Trump and his top advisers threatened on Monday to unleash the power of the federal government to punish what they alleged was a left-wing network that funds and incites violence, seizing on Charlie Kirk’s killing to make broad and unsubstantiated claims about their political opponents.

[...]

Trump and his top allies suggested that the suspect was part of a coordinated movement that was fomenting violence against conservatives, without presenting evidence that such a network existed.

[...]

Trump, who has downplayed violence from right-wing or other supporters, said that he would like to designate a range of groups, including the loosely affiliated group of far-left anti-fascism activists, known as “antifa,” as domestic terrorists and bring racketeering cases against people funding protests.

“We have some pretty radical groups and they got away with murder,” Mr. Trump said, without naming additional groups. He added that he was talking to the attorney general, Pam Bondi, about bringing charges under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act against “some of the people that you’ve been reading about that have been putting up millions and millions of dollars for agitation.”

He did not specify who or what he was talking about.

  NYT
Because he doesn't know. It's bullshit.
Democrats have warned that the Trump White House could be using Mr. Kirk’s killing as a pretense to go after political dissent, not just hate speech or violence.

“Pay attention. Something dark might be coming,” Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut wrote on social media on Sunday. “The murder of Charlie Kirk could have united Americans to confront political violence. Instead, Trump and his anti-democratic radicals look to be readying a campaign to destroy dissent.”

Rep. Greg Casar, Democrat of Texas, said on Monday that while the killing of Mr. Kirk was “heinous,” so were the killings of Melissa Hortman, a Democratic state lawmaker in Minnesota, and her husband, who were on a hit list of dozens of left-wing figures; the hammer assault on the husband of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi; and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by a pro-Trump mob.

“He cannot be allowed to use the horrible murder of Charlie Kirk as pretext to go after peaceful political opposition,” Mr. Casar said in a statement.
Wanna bet?
Two senior administration officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe internal planning, said that cabinet secretaries and federal department heads were working to identify organizations that funded or supported violence against conservatives.
Only conservatives.
One tactic has been to target the tax-exempt status of nonprofits that are critical of Mr. Trump or conservatives.

An administration official said officials would be investigating people behind the recent burning of Teslas in apparent protest of Elon Musk and assaults against immigration agents, and would be looking to draw links between those episodes and organized liberal groups.

[...]

They used Mr. Kirk’s podcast, with Mr. Vance as guest host, to announce that they would be cracking down on what they called leftist nongovernmental organizations, and that they would use every available lever of the federal government to do so.

“With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, eliminate and destroy this network and make America safe again for the American people,” said Stephen Miller, the president’s top policy adviser.
And by "American" he means MAGA people.
From his office at the White House, Mr. Vance invited other senior members of the administration to praise Mr. Kirk and decry the “far left.” The show was broadcast on the television screens in the White House briefing room and in several West Wing offices.

[...]

“We can thank God that most Democrats don’t share these attitudes, and I do, while acknowledging that something has gone very wrong with a lunatic fringe, a minority, but a growing and powerful minority on the far left,” he said.
Everry accusation is a confession.
Mr. Vance said the administration would not go after “constitutionally protected speech” but rather what he described as a network of nonprofit nongovernmental organizations that “foments, facilitates and engages in violence.”
ICE?
Representative Derrick Van Orden of Wisconsin, who blamed the media and Democrats for Mr. Kirk’s shooting even before a suspect had been identified, has essentially turned his X account into a bulletin board for reports of private citizens who have criticized Mr. Kirk’s remarks or seemed to celebrate his death. He has shared posts that have called for the firing of teachers, an airline pilot and a paralegal.
And it's happening. This is how Germany under Hitler and Russia under Stalin operated.
And Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, a Republican who has drifted further to the right during her time in Washington, pressed the Education Department in a letter on Friday to withhold federal funding from any school that did not “take immediate administrative action” against employees who had celebrated or made light of Mr. Kirk’s death.
"Minority Report" in real life. What next? Thought police?
Alina Habba complained on social media about state buildings in NY and NJ flying their flags normally instead of at half-staff to honor Kirk: “Flags were ordered to be lowered by the President of the United States. Lower. Your. Flags.”

The president only has authority over flags on federal property.

  Meidas Touch


We're not talking about the Epstein files now.  So they should be thanking the killer.
A memorial service for Kirk was held at the Kennedy Center last night. Kari Lake speaking at the event: “How does a 22-year-old become so filled with hate? Five years earlier I was told he was a Trump supporter and we send our kids off to college and they brainwashed them. I am making a plea to mothers. Do not send your children into these indoctrination camps. Do not do it.”

Just a reminder that Robinson spent the last 3 years at a trade school in Utah learning to be an electrician for his radical left woke marxist indoctrination.

Karoline Leavitt also spoke: "When so many influential voices in our society are brainwashing young people to abandon our faith, to stay single, not to have children and to bash our country, Charlie Kirk offered us an alternative path."

RFK Jr started out with this story: “I met Charlie for the first time in July of 2001 when I went on his podcast.”

Charlie was 8 years old in 2001.

Trump skipped the event to remain at his Bedminster golf club for the weekend.

  Meidas Touch

And Stephen Miller is more concerned with using the murder for his evil political ends.

“We are going to channel all the anger we have over the organized campaign to led to this assassination to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks. The organized doxxing campaigns. The organized riots. The organized street violence. The organized of dehumanization. Vilification. Posting people’s addresses. Combining that with messaging designed to trigger and incite violence and the actual organized cells that carry out and facilitate the violence. It is a vast domestic terror movement.”

“With God and as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the DOJ, DHS, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy these networks, and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name.”
And, speaking of Derrick Van Orden...
Van Orden has called Dems domestic terrorists, agreed with the conspiracy that Dems tried to assassinate Trump in PA, said that George Soros should be investigated and charged with being complicit in Kirk’s murder, and called for civil war.

UPDATE 10:37 am: Mehdi always has the receipts.





 

Saturday, July 12, 2025

They weren't kidding

When they said Trump would be coming for naturally born, white, American citizens next.


Think about it all you want, asshole.  You can't do it.

To some extent, the irrepressibly catty president of the United States is just barfing his feelings onto the internet. It is highly unlikely O’Donnell will face the loss of her citizenship and basic rights, even during this exceedingly lawless administration. And yet Trump’s threat to a comedian he’s long despised is not happening in a vacuum, in the same way that his threat to criminally investigate Bruce Springsteen, because the rock star said something Trump didn’t like, comes as Trump’s government is, in fact, criminally investigating Trump’s enemies only because they made the president mad. These are all different words in the same sentence in the exact same authoritarian tome[, revealing a commander in chief with nothing but contempt for the First Amendment, baseline constitutional values, and his own people.].

Trump’s Justice Department has explicitly stated how serious the administration is about prioritizing a large denaturalization push as part of Trump’s broader immigration crackdowns. Privately, Trump has repeatedly told lawyers and others in his second administration that when it comes to certain people he’d want to see lose their citizenship and then be shipped overseas for supposedly “national security” or “crime”-related reasons, he does not see a meaningful distinction between naturalized citizens and those who were born in the U.S.

[...]

O’Donnell moved to Ireland earlier this year after her Los Angeles home was destroyed by wildfires. She has said she would consider returning to the U.S. once “it is safe for all citizens to have equal rights there in America.”

  Rolling Stone
O'Donnell is also a member of the LGBTQ community, which is losing rights in Trumpland.
Trump recently suggested he could attempt to denaturalize Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic Socialist New York assemblyman and New York City’s Democratic mayoral nominee. Mamdani, who was born in Uganda, came to the U.S. as a child and has been a naturalized citizen in 2018.

“A lot of people are saying he’s here illegally,” Trump claimed. “We’re going to look at everything.”

It’s worth noting that Trump’s wife, Melania, is a naturalized citizen. She gained her U.S. citizenship after they were married.
So, it's a good thing he gets to be the one to choose who gets denaturalized.
And Trump believes he can decide, with a stroke of a pen, who qualifies for citizenship. Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, issued on Inauguration Day, attempts to put an end to America’s promise to extend citizenship to all people born in this country, including the children of immigrants.

[...]

Trump’s order was quickly blocked by several judges, and has already gone to the Supreme Court. The court’s conservative justices ignored the merits of the case, however, giving Trump a procedural win blocking lower federal courts from issuing nationwide injunctions.

The fight continues. A federal judge in New Hampshire blocked Trump from enforcing the birthright citizenship order on Thursday, while allowing a class-action challenge to the order to proceed.

Side note:  He was especially orange yesterday.

This is a picture from AP today.  Surely they didn't doctor it to increase the orange on his face.  Look at it near the ears.  

Rotisserie chicken.


Pretty obvious also in the Getty image in the Rolling Stone article.


The picture of health, vitality and decorum.

UPDATE 05:28 pm:






Wednesday, May 28, 2025

May 28, 1963

 The early days of Civil Rights Activism.


MAGA 

How long will this be allowed to be taught?




Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Trump 2.0 - The First Amendment is null and void

 


The House GOP’s campaign arm in recent weeks has successfully pressed three advertising companies to pull down Democratic billboard displays bashing vulnerable Republicans over Medicaid — a setback to Democratic campaigners hoping to make health care a liability for battleground Republicans around the country.

In a series of cease and desist letters, the National Republican Campaign Committee (NRCC) said the imposing roadside ads — sponsored by a splinter group of the top Democratic super PAC in six battleground districts — promoted “patently false” claims against the targeted GOP incumbents, warning the companies that they would be complicit in defaming those lawmakers if the billboards were left up for public consumption.

The threat proved successful — the billboards in all six districts were taken down almost immediately.

[...]

Democrats think otherwise. They’re defending the veracity of their Medicaid campaign, saying the ad companies didn’t pull the billboards on the basis of the accuracy of the NRCC complaint but because they’re terrified of the current political moment, in which President Trump is attacking political opponents in the public and private sectors alike.

  The Hill


Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Authoritarian?

 

Despotic might be a more accurate word.


They're hitting campuses for intimidation purposes because that's often where major dissention and protest of authoritarian regimes originates.







MAGA.


Now you know what happened to NPR to make it less useful.  The problem is not the number of registered Democrats (how does she know that?).  It's the CEO.

UPDATE 07:43 pm:


UPDATE 03/27/2025:  Regarding Rumeysa Ozturk...