Showing posts with label May-Theresa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label May-Theresa. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 10, 2019

In the age of Trump

Theresa May did everything she could to accommodate Donald Trump. She was the first leader to visit him after he became president. She offered him a state visit to the United Kingdom at a much earlier stage in his tenure than his predecessors had received one. She uttered nary a word of criticism of his administration.

[...]

Trump actively undermined May on at least a dozen occasions—whether by interfering in investigations into terrorist attacks or by criticizing her Brexit strategy—but every single time, the prime minister turned the other cheek. She went out of her way to make the state visit a success. The president brought his extended family to London and seemed to treasure every moment. Trump could not have wished for a prime minister who was less demanding or more sycophantic.

[...]

Trump gave May nothing in return. Her government’s extraordinary generosity and tolerance of the intolerable could not even save the U.K. ambassador, Kim Darroch, from the president’s wrath. After the ambassador’s cables were leaked to the Daily Mail, Trump denounced him as a “pompous fool” who had not served the United Kingdom well. He declared that his administration would no longer deal with him. Darroch was immediately disinvited from a White House dinner with the emir of Qatar. He resigned this morning.

[...]

>Darroch’s crime was to state the obvious: that the Trump administration is inept and dysfunctional. Gérard Araud, who served as France’s ambassador to the United States for four years, told me that “anyone who has any experience of Washington would agree” with Darroch’s assessment. [...] “When Trump announced the withdrawal of U.S. forces, nobody in the administration—not Bolton, not the head of the CIA, not the chairman of the Joint Chiefs—knew he would take this decision. They did not know what it meant. Syria was just one of countless examples. Trump makes these decisions from the hip. No one knows what he will decide or what will happen the day after.”

[...]

“The U.S.” he said, “is playing in a different category. Ultimately, politicians do not care about ambassadors. They will not create an existential crisis over the fate of a diplomat. If necessary, they will make the sacrifice.” Darroch “is the victim of a political game in London.”

[...]

The president’s casual cruelty toward friends and the failure of Darroch’s many friends inside the Trump administration to say anything publicly on his behalf speak volumes about how much value the Trump administration places on alliances.

[...]

Trump respects only power and leverage.

  The Atlantic
But the diplomatic issue doesn't go both ways. American diplomats are allowed to say whatever they want - and in public.
Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, has been scathing in his criticism of Brussels, calling the European Commission “out of touch with reality” and “off in the clouds.” In a New Year’s Eve interview on BBC Radio 4, Woody Johnson, the U.S. ambassador to the U.K., said he had traveled throughout the United Kingdom and found the people desperate for new leadership. Richard Grenell, the U.S. ambassador to Germany, began his term by calling for the United States to shame Germany on defense spending, and said he wanted to empower Trumpian conservatives in Europe. And this is what they have said on the record. One can only imagine their private briefings to the president.
So - for the rest of the world - why not discontinue diplomatically dealing with Trump?  He's just encouraged when you kowtow.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Monday, July 8, 2019

He had to apologize to IVANKA!

Britain’s trade minister will reportedly apologize to President Trump’s daughter and senior White House adviser Ivanka Trump after leaked memos revealed a British ambassador describing the administration as “dysfunctional” and “inept.”

[...]

Reuters reports that British trade minister Liam Fox said he will apologize on behalf of the British government in person to Ivanka Trump during his current visit to Washington. “I will be apologizing for the fact that either our civil service or elements of our political class have not lived up to the expectations that either we have or the United States has about their behavior, which in this particular case has lapsed in a most extraordinary and unacceptable way,” Fox said on BBC radio.

[...]

It is unclear if the leaked cables mentioned Ivanka Trump specifically.

  The Hill
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

"He is not liked or well thought of"

'

You don't know him, but you know he'u\s not liked or well thought of.  Jesus, you're a disgrace.



You'd love to be royalty.  We know.

And this is what Theresa May gets for her submissiveness to Trump and her response to her ambassador, saying she didn't agree with his criticism of Trump.  (This isn't the first time he's said he told May what to do and she didn't do it.)



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Everybody's saying it

Somebody leaked private memos belonging to Kim Darroch, the British ambassador to the US, and they aren't flattering to Old Lardass.
“As seen from here, we really don’t believe that this administration is going to become substantially more normal; less dysfunctional, less unpredictable, less faction-riven, less diplomatically clumsy and inept” – Summer 2017

[...]

“For a man who has risen to the highest office on the planet, President Trump radiates insecurity … There is no filter [that prevents Trump making offensive comments] … We could also be at the beginning of a downward spiral, rather than just a rollercoaster; something could emerge that leads to disgrace and downfall” – Summer 2017

[...]

In an interview with the Financial Times last year, Darroch gave a slightly different assessment. “I have met [Trump] seven or eight times and always found him to be absolutely charming,” he said.

[...]

Darroch says inviting Trump to the UK for a state visit was a “gamble”. But he says from Washington’s perspective it was a great success, earning the UK embassy precious extra goodwill from Trump staffers for whom this was “the hottest ticket of their careers”.

[...]

“[Trump’s] claim, however, that he changed his mind [about an air strike on Iran] because of 150 predicted casualties doesn’t stand up; he would certainly have heard this figure in his initial briefing. It’s more likely that he was never fully on board and that he was worried about how this apparent reversal of his 2016 campaign promises would look come 2020 [at the next election]” – 22 June 2019

[...]

Darroch says the embassy was in the dark on the night of the aborted airstrike for a while because even its “best contacts” were unwilling to answer calls. He warns that a further Iranian attack, involving the loss of American life, could trigger a U-turn from Trump.

  Guardian
Theresa May has expressed “full faith” in her ambassador to the US, Kim Darroch, but rejected his description of Donald Trump as inept and insecure, as she launched an inquiry into the leak of his diplomatic memos.

[...]

No 10 is scrambling to find the leaker after two years of memos emerged in the Mail on Sunday, causing Trump to condemn Darroch as someone who “has not served the UK well”.

  Guardian
And the poor man will surely have to be replaced.

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:

He has to apologize to IVANKA!
Britain’s trade minister will reportedly apologize to President Trump’s daughter and senior White House adviser Ivanka Trump after leaked memos revealed a British ambassador describing the administration as “dysfunctional” and “inept.”

[...]

Reuters reports that British trade minister Liam Fox said he will apologize on behalf of the British government in person to Ivanka Trump during his current visit to Washington. “I will be apologizing for the fact that either our civil service or elements of our political class have not lived up to the expectations that either we have or the United States has about their behavior, which in this particular case has lapsed in a most extraordinary and unacceptable way,” Fox said on BBC radio.

[...]

It is unclear if the leaked cables mentioned Ivanka Trump specifically.

  The Hill

Tuesday, June 4, 2019

Daniel Dale back on the trail

Trump and Theresa May.



What does she think she's going to get from him in return for kissing his ass?

As notes, WaPo reported that Trump was furious when he found out he was expelling so many Russians.  
May says that she supports the Iran nuclear deal but that she and Trump share “the same goal” on the issue.

Not if she supports the deal.

May said they had “positive discussions” on the issue of a US-UK trade agreement, but she provided no details.

Because there aren't any.  Positive discussions:  "We're going to have the best deal in the history of the world."  "Yes, we are."

Trump, like May, notes the anniversary of D-Day and the liberation of Europe from the Nazis. He adds, “It was a liberation like few people have seen before.”

Trump is asked about Corbyn’s criticism of him, over his criticism of the mayor of London among other things. Trump says of Khan, “He’s a negative force, not a positive force.” He says Khan hurts the people of this country. Trump says Corbyn is “somewhat of a negative force.” He says he doesn’t like “critics” as much as people who “get things done.”

Trump says the protests he saw were “a very, very small group of people put in for political reasons.” There is no apparent basis for the conspiratorial suggestion that they are inauthentic protesters.

If all he saw was a very, very small group, he was snuck in by the back alleys or he had his eyes closed.







Trump says he saw “thousands of people” on the street cheering him as he passed. Imaginary thousands of cheering people are a staple of Trump’s accounts of his trips places, even in the US.

Trump repeats his lie about having predicted Brexit the day before the vote at his golf course in Scotland. He wasn’t at the golf course until the day after the vote. He didn’t make a prediction the day before.

Trump tells his usual lie that he has a record approval rating among Republicans, “94%.” (It’s consistently been in the high 80s; GWBush reached the high 90s post-9/11.) “I love records,” he adds. I say “lie” with confidence because Trump once explained he knows Bush had a higher approval rating among Republicans, but it doesn’t count as a record because it was for a short period.

Trump concludes by calling May a “tremendous professional” and the US-UK alliance “the greatest alliance the world has ever known.”

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Dubya had a poodle, Trump has a whipping post

President Trump engaged in a tense conversation with British Prime Minister Theresa May, berating her over the phone while flying to Paris last Friday, according to the Washington Post.

May was reportedly calling Trump to congratulate him about Republicans' performance in the midterm elections, when the president apparently ripped into her.

According to the Post, Trump criticized May for not doing enough to rein in Iran, questioned her over Brexit and complained about European-American trade relationships.

According to U.S. and European officials briefed on the conversation, May and her aides were particularly shaken by this call, despite having endured criticism from Trump before.

  The Hill
May needs to find some pride and some backbone and stop trying to kiss His Lardship's extra large ass.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Sunday, July 15, 2018

Asshat in England

Trump's pomp-filled visit to the United Kingdom has been overshadowed by massive protests and an explosive interview in The Sun in which he blasted May, blamed London's mayor for terror attacks against the city and argued that Europe was "losing its culture" because of immigration.

The president who prides himself on not saying he's sorry did his own version of backtracking at a news conference with May by finding a way to blame his favorite foil for any perceived friction with May, whom he lavished with praise on the heels of questioning her leadership.

[...]

The interview was the latest breach of diplomatic protocol by Trump, whose predecessors tended to avoid criticizing their foreign hosts. And it comes at a perilous time for May, whose government is teetering amid contentious negotiations on how the U.K. will leave the European Union.

"Well, I think the deal that she is striking is not what the people voted on," Trump said in the interview. He also praised one of May's political rivals, former foreign secretary Boris Johnson.

[...]

Trump added that May's "soft" blueprint for the U.K.'s future dealings with the EU would probably "kill" any future trade deals with the United States.

[...]

He also told the tabloid that he'd shared advice with May during Britain's negotiations with the EU and she ignored it.

[...]

Trump was greeted by massive protests across Britain, including tens of thousands of demonstrators who filled the streets of London alongside a giant balloon that flew over Parliament on Friday depicting him as a cell-phone-toting angry baby in a diaper.

In a frenetic news conference at Chequers, [...] featuring the moos of cows in the distance at the end [...] Trump at times drew laughs from some British reporters, who jeered his criticism of the media and openly laughed at his numerous boasts.

  WCJB (ABC)
I'm sure he thought they were laughing with him.

Somebody pointed out that he was referring to England, not Britain or the UK, when talking about Brexit.
‘We would make a great deal with the United Kingdom because they have product that we like,” Trump said [in an interview with Piers Morgan]. “I mean they have a lot of great product. They make phenomenal things, you know, and you have different names – you can say ‘England’, you can say ‘UK’, you can say ‘United Kingdom’ … the fact is you make great product, you make great things. Even your farm product is so fantastic.”

Asked about mass protests against him in London on Friday, the day of the interview, Trump insisted: “‘Some of them are protesting in my favour, you know that? There are many, many protests in my favour.”

  Guardian
LOL, pal.



Quite possibly.  Here's the whole thing:


On the other hand, it could simply be that, as he always tells us how smart he is (some people say the smartest person in the world in history - ever), he is simply saying that whatever he says is right, and here's why.
Morgan’s interview was not so incendiary as the one Trump gave to the Sun on Thursday, ahead of meetings with May. Then, Trump criticised her handling of Brexit talks and said Boris Johnson would make a good prime minister.
Then he denied he said anything bad about May, calling The Sun's report "fake news" and claiming he has audio to prove it. Then The Sun released audio. Ooopsie.

Also...



On to the royal visit (that did not include the demanded golden chariot ride)...
Trump enthused about his reception at Windsor Castle on Friday, where he and Melania spent 45 minutes with the Queen.
Forty-five whole minutes! Brilliant.
“It was a very easy talk,” he said. “You know, it’s hard to talk to somebody if you’re, sort of, if there’s not that something special. You know that better than anybody. Sometimes you’ll have a guest on where no matter what you do it’s not working, right? And then sometimes it’s magic. We had a great, a great feeling.”

Morgan asked: “Did you get the feeling she liked you?”

“Well I don’t want to speak for her,” Trump said, “but I can tell you I liked her. So usually that helps. But I liked her a lot.”
Apparently, she disliked him so much that even he - the world's biggest liar/exaggerater/narcissist didn't even pretend she liked him.
Asked if he had discussed Brexit, Trump said: “I did. She said it’s a very – and she’s right – it’s a very complex problem. I think nobody had any idea how complex that was going to be … Everyone thought it was going to be, ‘Oh it’s simple, we join or don’t join, or let’s see what happens’.”
What he means is HE thought that. No one else did.
Trump would not say if the 92-year-old monarch told him what she really thinks of Britain’s attempt to leave the European Union.
Because she didn't tell him. Why would she?
“Well,” he said, “I can’t talk, you know I’ve heard very strongly from a lot of people, you just don’t talk about that conversation with the Queen, right? You don’t wanna do that."
They didn't talk about it. She told him nothing. They had 45 minutes over tea.  And there's a report that the 92-year-old queen was left waiting on the dais in 80 degree temp for 10 minutes for the asshat and the cunt to show up.  There's picture evidence.



This business of being late - like he was for both the G7 and NATO meetings - is a disgusting, arrogant move akin to yanking arms when shaking hands.  He's a pig.  (Apologies to pigs.)
"Let me tell you what I can talk about … she is an incredible woman, she is so sharp, she is so beautiful, when I say beautiful – inside and out. That is a beautiful woman.”


Monday, July 9, 2018

Speaking of Britain...

Boris Johnson has resigned as foreign secretary, becoming the third minister in 24 hours to walk out of the government rather than back Theresa May’s plans for a soft Brexit.

[...]

His resignation follows that of the Brexit secretary, David Davis, and his No 2 at the Department for Exiting the EU, Steve Baker.

[...]

[I]t emerged that Johnson had referred to attempts to sell the prime minister’s Brexit plan as ‘polishing a turd’.

  The Guardian
Get some pointers on that from Fox News.

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Ditch Theresa May

Past time. But definitely now. Just don't replace her with Boris Johnson. As if she doesn't have enough problems with Brexit.
Despite repeatedly embarrassing the British prime minister at a politically bruising G7 summit in Quebec, Donald Trump’s controversial visit to the UK next month would still appear to be on.

Theresa May insisted that she had exchanged warm greetings with the US president and he had said how much he was “looking forward” to his visit.

[...]

“We have a very good relationship with President Trump,” she said.

[...]

“We work closely with President Trump, and the UK has a very good relationship with the United States,” she said, defending his decision to leave early in order to prepare for his summit with Kim Jong-un.

“He’s going to Singapore to sit down and discuss the denuclearisation of North Korea ... that is in the interests of all of us across the world.”

  The Guardian
Is she really such a big sap that she doesn't realize sucking up to Trump isn't ever going to do her any good?
But her anger at the presidential slights, which included omitting her from a list of G7 leaders he had a strong relationship with, was evident when she issued a clear reprimand about his attitude to global cooperation.

“It does not mean taking unilateral action against your partners”, she said.
There you go. Come on, Tessie, get up or get out.

I don't suppose there's any hope the queen will kick him in the balls.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Friday, June 8, 2018

What happens when you suck up to Trump


She should have come out strong against him like Macron and Trudeau.  On the other hand, she is a woman, so that earns her immediate disdain. 

Monday, June 4, 2018

Apparently Macron isn't a very good judge of character

A call about trade and migration between US President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron soured last week after Macron candidly criticized Trump's policies, two sources familiar with the call told CNN.

"Just bad. It was terrible," one source told CNN. "Macron thought he would be able to speak his mind, based on the relationship. But Trump can't handle being criticized like that."

[...]

In a statement issued by the Elysee Palace ahead of the call, Macron said he "regrets the US decision to confirm tariffs in steel and aluminum."

"This decision is not only illegal, it is a mistake on many points. It is a mistake because it responds to a worldwide unbalance that exists in the worst ways through fragmentations and economic nationalism," the statement continued, with Macron adding that "if these kind of things impacted our relations, it would have been the case since day one because he has decided to leave the Paris (climate) agreement."

"I prefer to say things directly and not through the press; and I will tell him what I told you, which are my convictions that he knows already," he said in the statement.

[...]

Trump can expect a similar call from British Prime Minister Theresa May on Monday, sources tell CNN. It's not her style to be combative, but one source said May is expected to be direct in her criticisms and that Trump could expect a tough conversation.

  CNN
One hundred to one he calls her a cunt when he hangs up.

The White House statement mentioned nothing about a conflict.  We need someone to leak the actual conversation.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Lucky Brits

We only wish protests would keep him out of our country.
Bloomberg revealed that Trump complained in a phone call to May about the "negative coverage" he has received in the British press.

[Theresa] May told the US president that that was how the UK media operated and she could do little to change it.

Trump went on to say that he would not visit the UK unless there were guarantees that he would not be met with protests.

Advisers who had been listening to the phone call are reported to have been "astonished" at the demands.

[...]

The president had been billed to open the new US embassy in London in February but cancelled the trip citing his displeasure at its "off location" in south London.

The old embassy in Grosvenor Square was deemed a major security headache that could not be fixed, which meant a new building had to be put up somewhere else in London. It was eventually decided to relocate it to a more secure location, just a few miles away in the Vauxhall area.

  IB Times
Little Lord Lard Ass. 

Reports were that he once demanded a ride in the royal gold carriage. 
When Trump upended the world order by winning the presidency in November 2016, few leaders felt the vibrations as much as May. The soon-to-be U.S. president had supported Brexit and suggested making his supporter and her political rival, anti-EU campaigner Nigel Farage, the new British ambassador to Washington.

Her officials dismissed it. Matters worsened when it emerged that Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, May’s co-chiefs of staff, had publicly ridiculed Trump as “a chump” on Twitter before they entered government and urged their colleagues to shun his team. The pair set off on a secret trip to the U.S. to rescue the alliance. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson followed and soon after May arranged to visit the U.S.

Trump was clearly pleased with the idea. “She’ll be my Maggie,” he reportedly told his aides, referring to Reagan and Thatcher.

In London, Hill was especially keen to keep Trump close. She argued that a strong alliance with America was just what Britain needed in order to make a success of Brexit. The prospect of accelerating a trade agreement with the U.S. was a major goal for the U.K.

Hill and Timothy planned May’s trip to the White House and took up the idea of offering the president a state visit in return, the highest honor that Britain can give a foreign leader. It would involve the president and first lady staying with Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace and attending a state banquet in his honor. May's team believed such treatment would appeal to Trump's vanity.

  Bloomberg
It would have. But the Brits weren't so keen on it. And the queen probably had horror flashbacks of Dubya Bush's visit.

But, for now, Old Lard Ass is off to Davos amongst the richest of the rich.  He may not know that the Swiss don't want him either.



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Fucked it up again

How embarrassing.


He forgot to check to make sure the Theresa May he was tweeting at was the right one. 


The poor woman is going to get a bit of a shock next time she checks in to see what the fuck blew up her Twitter account.  Trumpettes jumped on the wrong band wagon along with the Idiot in Chief.  And there were 20 minutes of tweet after tweet either backing up Trump's post or calling him out for being an idiot.  Don't expect him to apologize to her.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

For May to Know and You to Find Out

A report on the foreign funding of extremism in the UK was given to Downing Street last year, it has been revealed, but Theresa May is still to decide whether to make its findings public.

[...]

The whereabouts of the report into foreign funding of extremism and radicalisation in the UK became a controversial issue in the final days of the general election after the terror attacks in Manchester and London Bridge.

It was commissioned by David Cameron and approved by May as part of a deal with the Liberal Democrats to secure the party’s support before a crucial vote on airstrikes in Syria in December 2015.

  The Guardian
The cynicism in US and UK foreign policy is astounding.
This week, [Green party co-leader, Caroline] Lucas resubmitted her parliamentary question on the review’s whereabouts to May, who wrote back to confirm ministers were still “considering advice on what is able to be published and will report to parliament with an update in due course”.

[...]

The Brighton Pavilion MP said it was crucial to determine if the report’s delay was linked to whether it was critical of Saudi Arabia.
What do you think?
During the election, the Liberal Democrat leader, Tim Farron, said Cameron had committed to publishing the report by spring 2016

[...]

However, despite Farron’s insistence that publication had been part of the deal, both the home secretary, Amber Rudd, and the foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, said the report may never be seen in public.
That would be my guess.
Farron said the written statement showed the power was in May’s hands to release the report. “It is a scandal that the government are suppressing this report. The only conclusion you can draw is that they are worried about what it actually says,” he said.

“We hear regularly about the Saudi arms deals or ministers going to Riyadh to kowtow before their royal family, but yet, our government won’t release a report that will clearly criticise Saudi Arabia."


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Worth a Thousand Words



And while we are waiting for the Queen's speech, here's an interesting article on what can derail a Prime Minister/party government in Great Britain, including the Queen.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Theresa May Grilled on BBC

America has politicians like Theresa May. Now we need reporters like Emily Maitlis.




Comedian Frankie Boyle "admires" May's tenacity.


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Friday, June 9, 2017

American Conservatives, Pay Attention

Several MPs said they believed it was May’s manifesto mistakes that allowed them to capitalise so effectively. Those errors, such as the cut to free school meals, support for the reinstatement of fox hunting and the dementia tax, immediately gave Labour MPs readymade attack lines.

[...]

Toby Perkins, [Labor] MP for Chesterfield, [...] cited fox hunting as a particular error. “People started thinking, if she gets a landslide what won’t she do?

[...]

“Older voters realised the Tories were going to come after their house. It was such a non-Tory thing to do and we had something to say to everyone, especially older voters who were braced to vote Tory for their first time in their lives. The dementia tax brought them all straight back to us.”

  Guardian
Cut school meals while reinstating fox hunting?  How out of touch can you be? And when all Trump's policies are in effect, I imagine the people will turn on him, as well.

You wonder what in hell the dementia tax is, don't you? I did.
The Tory manifesto unveiled in May contained a surprising pledge to shake up the way care for the elderly is funded.

Currently those in residential care have to pay for it themselves if they have assets above £23,250.

People can defer payment until after they die, meaning they do not have to sell their house while they are still alive or while a surviving partner lives in it.

For the first time, this rule will now also apply to so-called domiciliary care – care at home – if the Tories win the election.

It means those receiving home care will have to pay towards it and the value of their home will be included in their assets, which can be clawed back by councils.

[...]

Those who receive state-funded care at home will be worse off if they have assets of more than £100,000 – such as if they own their home.

Traditional Tory supporters say it is an attack on middle-class OAPs who want their children to inherit their property.

[...]

Lib Dem leader Tim Farron said it was a “callous blow for people who have dementia and other long-term conditions, like multiple sclerosis and motor neurone disease, and of course their families.

[...]

And Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn branded it a “tax on dementia” given those who need long-term care could now run up mammoth bills.

He accused the Conservatives of “forcing those who need social care to pay for it with their homes.”

  UK Sun
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

The Old Guard Losing Its Grip

With the showing that Bernie Sanders made in the US, and now that of Jeremy Corbyn in England, it's obvious that the old white conservative establishment is on shaky legs. They're either going to have to give over or change their ways. Or crack down and become dictators.


Theresa May will visit Buckingham Palace at lunchtime to request the Queen’s permission to form a government, after reaching an informal agreement with the unionist DUP.

[...]

The prime minister called the snap poll in the hope of winning a resounding personal mandate, with just days to go before Brexit talks with Brussels begin in earnest. But high turnout among young voters and an upbeat campaign by Jeremy Corbyn, with the Labour leader addressing jubilant rallies up and down the country, deprived the Conservatives of their majority.

[...]

With 649 of 650 seats declared, the Conservatives have 318 MPs, 12 fewer than when May called the election. Labour won seats deep in traditional Tory territory, taking their total to 261, up 31.

[...]

The DUP is socially conservative and enthusiastically pro-Brexit – and could also press for a boost to public spending in Northern Ireland, as well as assurances that it will not be treated differently to the rest of the UK in any Brexit deal.

[...]

The Brexit secretary, David Davis, who was instrumental in pressing for May to call an early poll, is understood to have discussed the prime minister’s plans with her on Friday morning. Senior Conservatives said pro-Brexit MPs were keen to see May remain in post to press ahead with negotiating Britain’s exit from the European Union.

[...]

Meanwhile Labour will press for [May] to resign, and try to show that it could form a coalition of its own – though the parliamentary arithmetic looks difficult, and the Liberal Democrats have repeatedly said they will not make electoral pacts.

John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor, called May a “lame duck” prime minister. “In the interests of the country we are willing to form a government, a minority government, and put forward a programme, a Queen’s speech, as well as an alternative budget and also an alternative programme for the Brexit negotiations and then it is up to other parties whether they support us,” he told Good Morning Britain.

[...]

Tory MP Anna Soubry broke ranks to say May should “consider her position”.

“It is bad. She is in a very difficult place … It was a dreadful night. I’ve lost some excellent and remarkable friends,” she said. “This is a very bad moment for the Conservative party and we need to take stock and our leader needs to take stock.”

  Guardian


We'll see if the Tories learned any more than our Democrats did from this unexpected showing.






...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Meanwhile, in Britain

Britain has a parliamentary system with first-past-the-post voting — a contrast both to the presidential system in the United States and the proportional representation seen in some European parliaments. This system means that Britons have one vote to choose their local member of Parliament. Whichever party has the most seats in Parliament will then form a government, with the party's leader as prime minister.

[...]

Historically, this has resulted in Britain having a two-party system dominated by the center-right Conservatives and the center-left Labour Party.

[...]

Theresa May of the Conservatives. May was a dark horse in last year's battle to succeed Cameron as prime minister, outmaneuvering bigger names such as Boris Johnson. Formerly Britain's home secretary for six years — a major cabinet position that includes national security responsibilities — May is Britain's second female prime minister after Margaret Thatcher. She is regarded as savvy by political observers but has sometimes appeared awkward on the campaign trail. May opposed Brexit during the referendum campaign but has taken a hard-line approach to negotiations.

Jeremy Corbyn of the Labour Party. For decades, Corbyn was a relatively obscure figure on Labour's far left, better known for his speeches at antiwar demonstrations than his hand in policy. But after Labour suffered an unexpected defeat in the 2015 election, the quirks of the party's internal politics handed him the party leadership. Corbyn has been dubbed unelectable and faced considerable opposition from his own party, but his radical chic and pro-spending policies have won over considerable numbers of younger voters. Corbyn campaigned for Britain to stay in the E.U. ahead of the 2015 referendum. Labour now supports Brexit but favors a less confrontational negotiating style.

[...]

When the prime minister called the election, she had good reason to believe she would not only win — but win in a landslide. Corbyn was viewed as an ineffective leader at best. Even politicians from his own party were predicting a “historic and catastrophic defeat,” with some warning that Britain could be heading toward a one-party state.

However, in the weeks since the election was called, Labour's numbers have rebounded dramatically.

  WaPo
How can the political elites be so wrong about the citizens of their country in both the US and Great Britain? Apparently they don't get out much.

Live results here (Labor just won Battersea and Ealing Central-places I've never heard of):


They're having a long night in England.