Know any young people?

Online information sessions in January.

Not going so well for Rudy

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 12/12/2023:

UPDATE 12/21/2023:

And, it is my understanding that a settlement payment is not affected by bankruptcy.

Ugh.

Trial lead-up not going well for Rudy

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said [...] jurors will be told that Giuliani intentionally hid financial documents and other records in defiance of court orders.

“Giuliani’s continued and flagrant disregard of this Court’s August 30 Order that he produce financial-related documents concerning his personal and his businesses’ past and present assets, revenues, income, viewership metrics, and social media, all of which information is potentially pertinent at the upcoming damages trial,” Howell wrote.

[...]

The Judge also said the jury will be instructed to infer that Giuliani received “substantial benefits” for defaming the election workers and that the Giuliani businesses “continue to generate” revenue from their operations.

[...]

The five-page ruling was released Friday, ahead of the scheduled Dec. 11 trial.

[...]

[Giuliani] also will not be able to state or suggest that he is “insolvent, bankrupt, judgement proof, or otherwise unable to defend himself, comply with this Court’s orders, or satisfy and eventual judgement.

  The Hill

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Merry Xmas, Rudy

UPDATE 09/22/2023:

Couldn't happen to a more deserving person

In an unsparing, 57-page ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Beryl Howell said Giuliani had flagrantly violated her orders to preserve and produce relevant evidence to the election workers, Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, resulting in a “default” judgment against him. She also ordered him to pay Freeman and Moss “punitive” damages for failing to fulfill his obligations. A jury will determine the amount of those damages.

  Politico

Excuse me, but I hope it breaks him economically for the rest of his miserable life.

Howell’s ruling is tied to Freeman and Moss’ separate lawsuit against Giuliani in federal court in Washington for defamation, civil conspiracy and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Howell has now ordered the case to proceed to a trial purely to determine the amount of damages Giuliani will have to pay them.

[...]

Giuliani spent weeks accusing Freeman and Moss of manipulating ballots during Georgia’s vote counting process after the 2020 election, despite repeated investigations that debunked and discredited the allegations.

The harassment that Freeman and Moss endured as a result of these conspiracy theories is at the heart of some of the criminal charges now facing several of Trump’s co-defendants in the Georgia racketeering case brought by Fulton County prosecutors. Giuliani is charged in that case, in part, for “false statements” to Georgia legislators related to his attacks on Freeman and Moss.

[...]

The election workers filed their lawsuit in 2021 against Giuliani and the owners of the conservative, pro-Trump One America News network, alleging that reports about claims the pair tampered with ballots were unfounded and libelous. One America’s owners settled with the two women last year for an unspecified amount, but the litigation has continued against Giuliani.

[...]

Howell has given the former New York City mayor and former federal prosecutor until Sept. 20 to produce documents about his net worth.

[...]

Howell also suggested that Giuliani’s complaints about the flurry of legal demands he is facing are theatrical and intended for political consumption.

“Donning a cloak of victimization may play well on a public stage to certain audiences, but in a court of law this performance has served only to subvert the normal process of discovery in a straight-forward defamation case, with the concomitant necessity of repeated court intervention,” she said. “The fact that Giuliani is a sophisticated litigant with a self-professed 50 years of experience in litigation — including serving as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York — only underscores his lackluster preservation efforts.”

Ouch.

Howell’s latest ruling comes amid a renewed and assertive effort by Giuliani and his allies to convince Trump to foot more of Giuliani’s mounting legal bills, which now include not only civil lawsuits, but the criminal indictment in Georgia where Trump, Giuliani and others are charged with racketeering for allegedly trying to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in that state.

As if. 

Rudy is going to lose his shirt, and Trump is not going to give him one of his. Even if Trump (or another Trumpy Republican) were to take the oval office next election and pardon Rudy for the crimes, he won't be able to recoup the money he's having to spend.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Toast

He says it doesn't matter, because he has a constitutional right to lie.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 07/27/2023:

It’s not entirely clear what caused this about-face, although recent developments in the case suggest that this may be an attempt to avoid further discovery obligations.

[...]

There’s yet another pending motion for sanctions alleging that Giuliani failed to preserve or spoliated evidence. Earlier this week, Giuliani’s buddy Bernie Kerik capitulated to the plaintiffs’ discovery demands after being threatened with monetary sanctions of his own. Kerik, a former law enforcement official with his own checkered past, accompanied Giuliani on his efforts to overturn Biden’s electoral college win. It’s probably not a coincidence that Giuliani had a change of heart just a day after Kerik agreed to turn all of his comms over.

Indeed, Giuliani’s own filings imply that he intends this stipulation to end discovery and obviate the need to pay any future sanctions.

[...]

Rudy appears to believe that his stipulation obviates the need for further discovery, presumably to include the scheduled deposition of Kerik and his agreed-upon document disclosures.

[...]

And perhaps he would be able to “get to the legal issues of the case” if he were not still claiming defenses which bring his state of mind into question. But if he is going to assert his right to, say, comment on issues of public concern, then the plaintiffs are unlikely to agree to waive further disclosures, much less forego the fee award for time already expended to get to this point.

  Above teh Law