Showing posts with label deOliveira-Carlos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deOliveira-Carlos. Show all posts

Friday, May 3, 2024

Let's talk about the laptop

No, not THAT laptop.
Former President Donald Trump's legal team turned over a folder with classification markings found [...] at his Mar-a-Lago resort to federal agents, multiple sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.

[...]

Trump attorney James Trusty turned over the folder with classification markings to federal investigators, and also informed agents that it had been electronically copied to a laptop of a current Trump aide, the sources said.

[...]

The laptop was not retrieved on the Mar-a-Lago grounds, the sources said.

  ABC
This got by me back in the early days of the Mar-A-Lago documents case.


 [...] 

Judge Cannon will make sure this case never gets to trial.  Or, at the very least, not before the election in November.

And a reminder - DeOliveira is cooperating.

UPDATE 07:48 pm:



Friday, October 13, 2023

Cannon to Trump's rescue - again

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon ultimately postponed a conflict-of-interest hearing for defendant Waltine Nauta, Trump’s valet who is represented by attorney Stanley Woodward.

Prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team raised fresh objections Thursday over whether Woodward should be allowed to question a key witness in the case. But Woodward told the judge that the prosecutors should have raised their arguments in court filings ahead of the hearing so he could discuss them with his client.

[...]

David Harbach, the veteran prosecutor representing the special counsel, drew Cannon’s ire after he asked her to consider barring Woodward from cross-examining “Trump Employee 4” at the trial, which is scheduled for next May.

The Mar-a-Lago employee in question, IT worker Yuscil Taveras, was previously represented by Woodward. When Woodward represented him, Taveras initially told investigators that he hadn’t heard conversations about allegedly deleting evidence in the case but then recanted his testimony after getting a public defender.

If Woodward were allowed to question Taveras, he’d be in the awkward position of asking his former client why he changed his testimony.

  Politico
That's not the worst of it. He also knows things that his former client told him that put Taveras at a disadvantage before him.
Cannon, who was clearly angry, agreed and called prosecutors’ arguments a “last-minute introduction.” Cannon was appointed to the bench by Trump.

Sticking to the correct procedure would have helped all sides come prepared to discuss the objections, she said, and chastised the prosecutors for not presenting related cases to bolster their arguments.
I suppose she has a point, and I wonder why Smith's people didn't do those things.
The intent of the hearing, as Cannon explained it, was to help Nauta understand potential conflicts that might arise over the course of the trial so that he could decide whether he still wanted Woodward to represent him.

An earlier hearing with De Oliveira proceeded smoothly, with De Oliveira deciding that he wanted to proceed with his attorney, John Irving, and waive conflict-of-interest concerns. Irving previously represented three other potential witnesses in the trial, and the various parties agreed that if there were any concerns, then De Oliveira’s Florida attorney, Donald Morrell, could cross-examine those particular witnesses.

[...]

Cannon laid out various scenarios to de Oliveira on Thursday about possible conflict of interest issues that might emerge and warned the defendant that Irving could have “divided loyalties” that might prevent him from poking holes in witnesses testimony.

She repeatedly told De Oliveira that he could take more time to make a decision and warned he could not use the conflict-of-interest argument in a potential appeal.
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, August 26, 2023

Setting up an appeal or dismissal?


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 08/31/2023:

A fuller explanation of the latest in the Georgia documents case with the news of a change in testimony from Yuscil Taveras is laid out in this article from Public Notice. 

Tuesday, August 22, 2023

Cannon gets her answer and Trump's lawyers push the envelope

A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The security aide – described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras – initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C. that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team revealed the details of the employee’s about-face as part of a filing demanded by Florida-based U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who is overseeing the classified records case against the former president.

She had questioned why prosecutors continued to collect evidence from a grand jury empaneled in Washington, D.C., even after Smith obtained a grand jury indictment in Florida in June charging Trump with more than 30 counts of retaining classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

[...]

In an apparent bid to assuage any continuing concerns by Cannon about a grand jury hundred of miles away working on matters related to the case she is handling, Smith’s team informed her that the D.C. grand jury officially completed its work Aug. 17.

  Politico
The very humorous part of this deal is that a Trump lawyer (Stan Woodward) was paid for to represent several people involved in the documents fiasco, and when Taveras began cooperating with Smith's office, the special counsel appealed to the court to have Woodward removed from Taveras' representation considering the obvious conflict. Woodward's suggested proposal to take care of the conflict problem was - get this - to not call on Taveras to testify at trial!
“The Government is unaware of one, in which a court has excluded evidence to avoid a conflict on facts remotely similar to this case, where the Government put Mr. Woodward on notice long ago about potential conflicts,” Harbach wrote, “and he is now seeking to affirmatively use those conflicts to gain a tactical advantage at trial by excluding highly incriminating evidence to the benefit of not only his own client but also a co-defendant [Trump] whose PAC is paying his legal fees.”
Ordinarily you'd recognize this was a crazy suggestion and sure to go nowhere, but remember, this case is before Judge Aileen Cannon, so why not give it a try?

UPDATE 05:33 pm:


UPDATE 07:17 pm:




UPDATE 08/23/2023 11:46 am:


I have to assume that Trump's team will be saying Smith would still be ILLEGALLY using the DC Grand Jury if Judge Cannon hadn't made him stop.

UPDATE 08/24/2023:


UPDATE 08/31/2023:

A fuller explanation of the latest in the Georgia documents case with the news of a change in testimony from Yuscil Taveras is laid out in this article from Public Notice. 

Thursday, August 10, 2023

Here we go round the mulberry bush

Donald Trump pleaded not guilty through his attorneys Thursday in a second court appearance after Justice Department lawyers brought additional charges in the Mar-a-Lago case accusing the former president of leading an effort to delete security camera footage from his Florida home.

Trump’s co-defendant in the case Walt Nauta, Trump’s valet, pleaded not guilty. Another co-defendant, Carlos De Oliveira, a property manager at Mar-a-Lago, entered no plea as he has not yet secured a Florida-based attorney.

  The Hill
Same unsurprising play as Nauta. I have a feeling Smith isn't so concerned about delays in this trial, since he obviously wants the DC trial to go first.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 01:35 pm:



Wednesday, August 9, 2023

Trump wants convenience for his criminal trial

Trump’s lawyers suggested the re-establishment of a sensitive compartmented information facility, often called a “Scif”, at Mar-a-Lago in an 11-page filing that argued Trump’s schedule and security requirements made it impossible for him to make regular trips to such a facility at a courthouse.

The Scif at Mar-a-Lago that existed during the Trump presidency was removed after Trump left office in January 2021. Although the case has elements that are novel, reconstructing a Scif for a private citizen because of their former office would be unprecedented.

  The Guardian
Will Aileen Cannon buy it? I have an idea: Let him live in a cell in a courthouse that already has a secure SCIF.
Trump had sought permission to discuss the classified documents with his lawyers at both his Bedminster club in New Jersey, where he spends his summers, and his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, where the indictment against him says he hoarded the national security papers.

But prosecutors objected to the final request, noting that they were unaware of any previous case where defendants were allowed to discuss classified information in a private residence and that it was inconsistent with the law.

“There is no basis for the defendant’s request,” prosecutors wrote last month. “It is particularly striking that he seeks permission to do so in the very location at which he is charged with wilfully retaining the documents charged in this case.”


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 08/10/2023:



Tuesday, August 8, 2023

Aileen Cannon's troubling ruling






...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 04:28 pm:  She's absolutely pathetic.


UPDATE 08/09/2023:  Andew Weissmann discusses the issue on MSNBC.

Alex Wagner:  "Cannon 0.0, Beta testing."

UPDATE 08/09/2023 12:02 pm:
Most of the classified documents case is being handled out of Cannon's district in South Florida, but some grand jury work in the case was also conducted in Washington D.C., where the former president was also recently indicted for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.

Cannon took issue with this and questioned why a grand jury heard evidence in D.C. after Trump had already been indicted by a grand jury in Florida, demanding an explanation from Smith by Aug. 22.

"Based on her order, it appears that Cannon is crossing into the government's lane," former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade, a University of Michigan law professor, told Salon. "Under the constitutional separation of powers structure, the executive branch has sole authority to investigate and charge criminal offenses. There is no reason the special counsel cannot investigate related charges in other districts."

[...]

"It may be awkward, but the special counsel may need to politely tell Judge Cannon to butt out," she added.

[...]

But criminal defense attorney Julia Jayne of the San Francisco Bay area Jayne Law Group said it is unusual for a case to be investigated by grand juries in different jurisdictions.

"Unless this is some play to drop Florida charges and have it proceed elsewhere – say Washington D.C., where the documents originated from – this is an odd development," Jayne said. "If the special counsel wants to add charges or continue investigating the classified documents case, that would typically be done in the same jurisdiction the charges are pending. In this case, that would be Florida."

  Salon
I can imagine it might just be Smith's hedge, assuming he might have to ask for a change of venue considering Cannon's inexperience and obvious attempts to favor Trump.
Cannon was appointed to the bench by Trump after he lost the 2020 presidential election to Joe Biden.
Somebody else anticipating a legal need.

UPDATE 08/10/2023:




Monday, August 7, 2023

Aileen Cannon to the resuce?



Stay tuned.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 01:29 pm:


That's just the way she rolls.




For some reason, I think we already knew that - or suspected it.  But maybe a judge is not supposed to confirm it.




UPDATE 08/08/2023:  Why Cannon's ruling is worrisome...





Sunday, August 6, 2023

Surprise, surprise

Same exact tack as the delaying tactics of Walt Nauta...
Mar-a-Lago employee Carlos De Oliveira, who faces criminal charges in the case regarding former President Donald Trump's handling of classified documents, made his first appearance in federal court in Florida Monday.

De Oliveira, the property manager and former valet at Trump's Mar-a-Lago golf club, did not enter a plea because he has not yet retained counsel licensed in Florida.

  MSN
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, August 1, 2023

Trump will be arraigned again in Florida

Donald Trump and Walt Nauta will be arraigned on August 10th in federal district court in Florida over the additional criminal charges filed last week in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, CNN reports.

The order doesn’t address whether either man will be required to attend in person.

  Political Wire
My guess is no. They'll just have to send their attorneys.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Gleanings

Carlos De Oliveira, a middle-aged property manager from Florida, met with federal investigators in April for what is called a “queen for a day” session — a chance to set the record straight about prosecutors’ growing suspicions of his conduct at Donald Trump’s Florida home and private club. It did not go well.

[...]

On Thursday, De Oliveira was indicted alongside Trump and his co-worker Waltine “Walt” Nauta — all three accused of seeking to delete security footage the Justice Department was requesting as part of its classified documents investigation.

[...]

The series of discussions between De Oliveira and investigators highlight how prosecutors led by special counsel Jack Smith have approached Trump employees with a mixture of hope and suspicion: hope that the former president’s employees could explain what had happened inside Mar-a-Lago, and suspicion that whatever misdeeds may have occurred, they might have been aided by servants who stayed loyal to the boss — even after the FBI came knocking.

[...]

When FBI agents arrived at Mar-a-Lago the morning of Aug. 8 with a court-issued search warrant [they asked De Oliveira] to unlock a storage room where boxes of documents were kept, people familiar with what happened said. De Oliveira said he wasn’t sure where the key was, because he’d given it to either the Secret Service agents guarding the former president or staffers for Trump’s post-presidency office.

  WaPo
He has ostensibly installed the lock in the first place because the FBI were appalled the records were in an "unsecured" place. Now he doesn't fucking know what he did with the key????
Frustrated, the agents simply cut the lock on the gold-colored door. The incident became part of what investigators would see as a troubling pattern with the answers De Oliveira gave them as they investigated Trump.
De Oliveira is taking a monumental gamble if he's not going to flip on Trump, risking years behind bars for all his crimes and bullshit.  He's definitely not made himself a sympathetic figure to the authorities.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, July 29, 2023

In his own words

Trump had thoughts about and words for anyone handling classified national security documents before he violated the laws regarding the same.

Some are recorded in the Mar-a-Lago documents case indictment
(p.9) 
TRUMP's Public Statements on Classified Information 
23. As a candidate for President of the United States, TRUMP made the following public statements, among others, about classified information:
a. On August 18, 2016, TRUMP stated, “In my administration I'm going to enforce all laws concerning the protection of classified information. No one will be above the law."

b. On September 6, 2016. TRUMP stated, “We also need to fight this battle by collecting intelligence and then protecting, protecting our classified secrets... We can't have someone in the Oval Office who doesn't understand the meaning of the word confidential or classified.”

c. On September 7, 2016. TRUMP stated. “[O]ne of the first things we must do is to enforce all classification rules and to enforce all laws relating to the handling of classified information.”

d. On September 19, 2016, TRUMP stated, “We also need the best protection of classified information.”

e. On November 3, 2016, TRUMP stated, “Service members here in North Carolina have risked their lives to acquire classified intelligence to protect our country.”
24. As President of the United States, on July 26, 2018, TRUMP issued the following statement about classified information:
As the head of the executive branch and Commander in Chief, I have a unique Constitutional responsibility to protect the Nation's classified information, including by controlling access to it. More broadly, the issue of [a former executive branch official's] security clearance raises larger questions about the practice of former officials maintaining access to our Nation's most sensitive secrets long after their time in Government has ended. Such access is particularly inappropriate when former officials have transitioned into highly partisan positions and seek to use real or perceived access to sensitive information to validate their political attacks. Any access granted to our Nation's secrets should be in furtherance of national, not personal, interests.
[...]

(p.17) 
36. In August or September 2021, when he was no longer president, TRUMP met in his office at The Bedminster Club with a representative of his political action committee (the“PAC Representative”). During the meeting, TRUMP commented that an ongoing military operation in Country B was not going well. TRUMP showed the PAC Representative a classified map of County B and told the PAC Representative that he should not be showing the map to the PAC Representative and to not get too close. The PAC Representative did not have a security clearance or any need-to-know classified information about the military operation.

37. On February 16, 2017, four years before TRUMP's disclosures of classified information set forth above, TRUMP said at a press conference:

“The first thing I thought of when I heard about it is, how does the press get this information that's classified? How do they do it? You know why? Because it's an illegal process, and the press should be ashamed of themselves. But more importantly, the people that gave out the information to the press should be ashamed of themselves. Really ashamed.
--------

You can read the indictment here.

Or you can let it be read to you here

The whole thing is an amazing account of bald-faced arrogance and incredible ignorance on the part of a former president of the US, who should obviously never have been near the office, and proof of his illegal activity surrounding classified documents and attempt to cover it up, including directing his minions to destroy security camera video and hiding evidence from his own attorneys. 

And Republicans want to put him back in office.  

Thursday, July 27, 2023

Better and better

While we wait for the announcement of an indictment for the insurrection...
The Justice Department, in a new superseding indictment unveiled Thursday, is charging former President Trump with seeking to delete Mar-a-Lago surveillance video footage last year in connection with the federal classified records case.

Trump is charged in the new indictment along with Carlos de Oliveira, the property manager of the resort and a new defendant in the case, and his valet Walt Nauta, who had faced previous charges.

  The Hill
Special Counsel Smith's team said in a separate filing that they would work to ensure the new charges would not delay the trial.

[...]

De Oliveira is due to appear in court in Miami on Monday.

[...]

Prosecutors also said they recovered the document involved in an incident in which Trump, bragged about a "plan of attack" against another country in an interview at his New Jersey golf resort.

  Post News
A superseding indictment unsealed by the Justice Department lists multiple new counts against Trump, including: altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing an object; and corruptly altering, destroying, mutilating or concealing a document, record or other object; and an additional charge of willful retention of national defense information.

[...]

De Oliveira [...] faces one count of altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing an object; one count of corruptly altering, destroying, mutilating or concealing a document, record or other object; and one count of making false statements and representations during a voluntary interview with federal investigators.

He has been ordered to appear in federal court in Miami on Monday morning.

[...]

The superseding indictment names De Oliveira as one of the aides who helped move boxes for Trump, and federal prosecutors allege that he, along with Trump and Nauta, instructed an unnamed employee to delete Mar-a-Lago security camera footage to prevent it from being turned over to a federal grand jury.

[...]

The 32nd count of willful retention of national defense information in the superseding indictment stems from a document Trump showed to four people during a July, 21, 2021, meeting at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, according to the new filing. The indictment alleges that the document, which Trump had until mid-Jan. 2022, was marked TOP SECRET/NOFORN, and is described in the indictment as a "presentation concerning military activity in a foreign country."

The superseding indictment notes that Trump was participating in a recorded interview with a writer and a publisher, and two of his aides were also present. The former president told the group he had a "plan of attack" from a senior military official. Trump characterized the document as "highly confidential" and "secret information" and noted that "as president I could have declassified it. … Now I can't, you know, but this is still a secret." The indictment also points out that neither the aides nor the writer or publisher had a security clearance.

The document, which CBS News reported was a Defense Department memo on Iran, was not part of the original 31 counts of retention of national defense information charged in Smith's initial indictment.

[...]

According to the filing, the Justice Department emailed the attorney for Trump's business with the final grand jury subpoena, requiring the production of surveillance records, videos and images, on June 24, 2022.

[...]

On June 27, 2022, the indictment says, De Oliveira took another Trump employee to a small room known as an "audio closet," and asked the employee how many days the server retained security footage. The employee said he believed it was about 45 days. "De Oliveira told Trump Employee 4 that 'the boss' wanted the server deleted," the indictment states. "Trump Employee 4 responded that he would not know how to do that, and that he did not believe that he would have the rights to do that. ... De Oliveira then insisted to Trump Employee 4 that 'the boss' wanted the server deleted and asked, 'What are we going to do?'"

  CBS
Assuming Employee 4 is the source of the information, I hope Employee 4 has protection.

.....but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 07/28/2023:
Keep in mind, DeOliveira is the guy who helped Nauta move boxes. He's represented by an attorney paid for by the Trump Save America PAC. He's the guy who called the Mar a Lago IT guy and asked questions about how long security footage was kept. And he's the guy that reportedly drained the pool into the server room where the surveillance footage was stored.

[...]

[T]he day after DoJ subpoenaed the Trump Org for the security camera footage, Trump called DeOliveira and they spoke for 24 minutes.

[...]

Trump asked Nauta to return to Mar a Lago, and when he got there, Nauta told DeOliveira that trump wanted him to talk to the IT guy.

Two days after that, DeOliveira went to see the IT guy and told him trump wanted him to DELETE the security footage.

Now, the indictment does NOT address any attempts to delete or destroy the footage, just the attempt (which is a crime). So all three have been charged with obstruction of justice for that attempt. DeOliveira has also been charged with lying to the FBI about moving boxes with Carlos.

It's also mentioned in the indictment that DeOliveira was told if he were loyal, trump would pay for his lawyer.

  Mueller, She Wrote



My belief is that's 99.99% likely.  DeOliveira is the guy who drained the pool.
Subject to the Court’s approval, the Special Counsel’s Office will not oppose defendants Trump and Nauta waiving appearance at an arraignment on the superseding indictment pursuant to the conditions set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 10(b).

  NBC
Presumably, since dissemination of classified materials was not charged in this case (because it wasn't done at Mar-a-Lago), Smith could still charge that crime in New Jersey.*

UPDATE 07/28/2023 08:53 am:


The information technology worker who appeared in recent weeks before a federal grand jury hearing evidence as to how 15 boxes of government documents wound up at former President Donald Trump’s Florida estate was identified by The New York Times on Wednesday night. Two sources familiar with the matter told the Times that the man, Yuscil Taveras, had answered questions about his relationship to two other Trump aides at Mar-a-Lago. One, a former valet named Walt Nauta, was identified late last year; the other, Carlos Deoliveira, was identified and described as Mar-a-Lago’s head of maintenance by the Times [...] Taveras was asked about a call Deoliveira placed to him last summer.

  Daily Beast


The question answers itself.  His attorney - paid for by Trump - has as his foremost concern Trump's best interests.


And gives him another possible flipper.

*UPDATE 07/30/2023:  This is not clear to me.  The particular section of the law dealt with may allow for retention and/or dissemination.  We'll have to wait and see.  At least I will.


But deOliveira can always say by "the boss" he meant Nauta.  Right?

UPDATE 07/31/2023:


Two thoughts:
1) If you're going to have any conflict with another defendant, you need separate lawyers;
2) This gives the impression that Taveras wasn't being allowed to tell the truth as long as he had the Trump-funded lawyer; which in turn suggests that other defendants with that lawyer are not telling the truth.

UPDATE 07/31/2023 04:29 pm:
The tale of the two gormless henchmen creeping around the basement pointing flashlights at security cameras and the servers they'd been dispatched by Trump to wipe — all the while being captured by those very same cameras! — is almost too ludicrous to bear. Who knew there could be something more preposterous than that photo of the tacky bathroom with the boxes stacked in the shower?

[...]

Were they dressed like Joe Pesci and Daniel Stern in the Home Alone movies? Did they take flashlights because they hoped somehow to defeat the motion-activated camera sensors referred to in the evidentiary pleadings?

[...]

After being rebuffed by Taveras, De Oliveira and Nauta regrouped. At 1:31, De Oliveira dove through the bushes to meet Nauta on an adjacent property — presumably one without cameras — snuck back through the brambles for another visit to the IT office, and then, like a Homer Simpson gif come to life, crossed back through the bushes to report to Nauta.

[...]

[T]he whole thing is a Keystone Cops comedy where the protagonist is a cartoon villain who swipes oversized love notes from murderous despots and stashes military secrets in his pool locker.

Normal people don’t pratfall into violating the Espionage Act because they think that national defense documents are cool keepsakes to have around. But normal people also don’t spend 70 years cultivating a reputation as serial philanderers, only to hold themselves out as avatars of Christian values. So perhaps it was inevitable that we’d wind up here, with the former president facing a decade in jail for crimes so mind-numbingly stupid, and yet so extensively documented.

From the boxes in the bathroom, to the flashlights in the tunnel. From the lawyer fresh off a stint at OAN, to the lawyer dictating a long memo explaining that his client instructed him to defy a grand jury subpoena. From Trump recording himself disseminating national defense information, to his goons getting caught on camera trying to destroy the security footage.

It’s all so offensively dumb!

[...]

Next we'll find out that the security camera footage was destroyed in a conveniently timed flood.

OH, WAIT.

   Public Notice
Some day we'll see a TV miniseries akin to "White House Plumbers" about this bumbling crime.