Or, third possibility, Dan is about to be fired.
If Dan means he's going to follow the evidence, he's going to be on his own. The Director - Kash Patel - is going to do whatever Trump tells him to do.
Or, third possibility, Dan is about to be fired.
Big breath.
A couple of days ago...
Called her to object? I believe he called her to threaten.
Okay, before we go further, this story is in The Wall Street Journal. That's owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Fox News. The Journal explains that there were two arcs in the drawing denoting the female's breasts, and that "below the waist" was actually Trump's signature where you would expect pubic hair.Donald Trump wrote a birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein in the early 2000s in which the future president, addressing the future convicted sex offender, noted that “we have certain things in common.” The existence of the letter was reported today by The Wall Street Journal, which obtained documents pertaining to a 2003 album put together for Epstein’s 50th birthday by his partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, also now a convicted sex offender.
The Journal notes that the letter bearing Trump’s name was outlined by a drawing of a naked woman, and that the woman appeared to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. Trump’s signature, as “Donald,” appears below the woman’s waist.
Rolling Stone
Voiceover: There must be more to life than having everything.
Donald: Yes, there is, but I won’t tell you what it is.
Jeffrey: Nor will I, since I also know what it is.
Donald: We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.
Jeffrey: Yes, we do, come to think of it.
Donald: Enigmas never age, have you noticed that?
Jeffrey: As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you.
Trump: A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.
Well, we know he "wrote a picture" before. In fact, several of them were auctioned "for charity". (I expect the money went into Trump's "charitable foundation" which was, in recent years, shut down by court order because it wasn't charitable.Trump denied he wrote the letter. [...] “I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women. It’s not my language. It’s not my words.”

He does in fact sue everyone. I didn't think he'd actually do it, because, you know, discovery. More on the threat later.Trump said he would sue the Journal [NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch] if they published a story on the letter. “I’m gonna sue The Wall Street Journal just like I sued everyone else,” the president said.
As a matter of fact, it sounds exactly like Trump.[Trump] called the story “false, malicious, and defamatory” and described the Journal as a “Disgusting and Filthy Rag.”
Vice President J.D. Vance sprang to Trump’s defense tonight. “Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit. The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it,” Vice President J.D. Vance wrote on X. “Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?”
Everywhere else. There's been hardly any news other than this. It has even consumed MAGA, who were so sure releasing the Epstein files would entrap elite Dems.White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt alleged that the Journal “knowingly published false information to smear the President of the United States” and that the story is part of a “coordinated Hoax by the Democrats and Fake News to smear President Trump.”
[...]
One administration official describes the White House as having been “on a fucking warpath” in its pressure campaign against the conservative newspaper, working different contacts and angles in an attempt to get the outlet to drop the story. This official notes this was rated a top “priority” by Trump and dominated various conversations within the West Wing and elsewhere this week.
Yes, he called them stupid. Pretty sure that's not going to help his cause.Trump has responded by claiming repeatedly that former President Barack Obama and other Democrats fabricated the Epstein files, while attacking his supporters for being duped by what the president is now calling a “hoax.”
And he chose the worst. He posted super lengthy, desperate rants on "Truth Social". And actually filed that threatened lawsuit. Not smart.Multiple Trump advisers and others in the president’s political orbit concede that the president’s sustained endeavor to snuff out the story has only made it seem more important. “It’s been weighing on him,” another administration source says. “The president wanted multiple options, legal too, explored for what he could do to stop or hit back against the story.”
Polling conducted last month found that a majority of Americans, about 79 per cent, support full disclosure of any names linked to Epstein's criminal proceedings, The Independent reported. Analysts say this could present a risk to Trump if his stance is viewed as dismissive or evasive during a key election period.
International Business Times
He still can't get a good lawyer.The new lawsuit calls the letter “nonexistent,” setting the stage for the likely exposure of a letter that so far has only been described but not seen.
[...]
Setting aside its main focus, Trump’s lawsuit veers off into odd directions.
In one paragraph, his lawyer Alejandro Brito offers a strange definition of a journalistic “exclusive.”
“The Article was published in The Wall Street Journal as an exclusive,” the complaint says. “However, since publication, Defendants have widely disseminated it to hundreds of millions of people worldwide.”
The lawsuit says it was “implicitly defamatory” for the Journal to report that Trump was Epstein’s “friend” or “pal,” but Trump spoke about his then-15-year-old relationship with Epstein in a New York Magazine profile from 2003.
Adam Klasfeld Substack
The lawsuit itself.Through the lawsuit, Trump has invited scrutiny about his relationship with Epstein in court. The newspaper’s parent company Dow Jones expressed full confidence in their reporting, which suggests that the letter and could come to light and be authenticated during litigation.
Seems likely.The Epstein files—and Donald Trump’s refusal to release many of them—have dominated the news cycle for the better part of two weeks. The issue is… I don’t care. I refuse to care. I think liberals have worked themselves up into a tizzy over a potential rift between Trump and his MAGA base—as if the racists and bigots who have made supporting Trump their entire personality will abandon him now. They won’t. Trump and MAGA will kiss and make up and find that the real problem was Democrats or gay people or immigrants or fluoride.
Elie Mystal newsletter
Watching his approval numbers sink to the bottom of the sea.
All lies, all the time.
UPDATE 04/28/2025: He's seen the polls.
Because the rubes will believe anything.
UPDATE 04/29/2025:
He's right about that. The "real" polls show they understand we're heading into the shitter.
Got ketchup?Bloomberg’s top editor, John Micklethwait, repeatedly pressed Trump at the Economic Club of Chicago over his plans to impose a universal tariff on imports and his threats to use tariffs on American companies that outsource their manufacturing.
Micklethwait noted Trump’s plans would essentially halt trade with China, place at least a 10 percent tariff on European nations and have a drastic effect on the U.S. economy, where 40 million jobs rely on trade.
“That is going to have a serious effect on the overall economy,” Micklethwait said.
The Hill
What???!!! OMG.“It’s going to have a massive effect — positive effect. It’s going to be a positive effect,” Trump responded. “It must be hard for you to spend 25 years talking about tariffs as being negative and then have somebody explain to you that you’re totally wrong.”
Holy canole. They can't let him do more interviews. He canceled CNN. I guess they thought fewer MAGAheads would be watching Bloomberg.Micklethwait noted that critics have said Trump’s tariff proposals for all imports would amount to a national sales tax, with $3 trillion worth of imports affected and companies passing on higher costs to buyers.
“That is just simple mathematics, President Trump,” he said.
“It is, but not the way you figured. I was always very good at mathematics,” Trump replied, suggesting higher tariffs would make it more likely for foreign companies to build factories in the United States.
Micklethwait asked Trump if he would commit “to respecting and encouraging a peaceful transfer of power,” especially in light of Jan. 6, 2021, which the journalist called “unruly and violent.”
Trump didn’t answer the question. Instead, he rejected the premise and blamed Micklethwait as “a man that has not been a big Trump fan over the years.” He also falsely claimed that he allowed for a peaceful transfer of power in 2020, when Joe Biden defeated him.
“Come on, President Trump, you had a peaceful transfer of power compared to Venezuela, but it was by far the worst transfer of power for a long time,” Micklethwait insisted.
The audience booed and Trump thanked them. The former president then admitted that people were angry when they arrived in Washington to protest the results that January—but according to him, they were perfectly behaved.
“It was love and peace, and some people went to the Capitol,” Trump said. “And a lot of strange things happened there, a lot of strange things, with people being waved into the Capitol by police.”
[...]
“Not one of those people had a gun, nobody was killed, except for Ashli Babbitt,” he said.
The Daily Beast
Even Newsmax, Trump's Fox replacement, MAGA outlet, showed a poll with Trump as the loser by far.Harris took to the stage for a rally in North Carolina where she addressed her desire to face the former president again.
“I believe we owe it to the voters to have another debate, because this election and what are at stake could not be more important,” Harris told supporters.
[...]
A CNN rapid poll found 63 percent of debate watchers said Harris won Tuesday’s debate, compared to 37 percent who said Trump won. Multiple polls released Thursday showed Harris widening her lead over Trump nationally.
The Hill
Do you think "The Hill" might dig a little? RFK Jr (even) said he'd seen those polls that said Trump won, and that they were "polls you see on the internet" that "probably have statistical" problems. Like maybe being polls of five or six MAGA diehards?Trump cited multiple social media polls in the Wednesday morning interview, including one posted by C-SPAN, that showed he fared better than Harris. And a Trump campaign poll found Trump got a 2-point bump from the debate, while Harris’s support in battleground states remained flat.