Showing posts with label Brown-Barrett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brown-Barrett. Show all posts

Friday, October 20, 2017

How do we get out of this mess?

The Pursuance System, the culmination of eight years of thought and refinement, will be launched later this year, operating under a basic software framework explained at our website and overseen by a non-profit that we've set up for the purpose. The board of directors includes Icelandic Member of Parliament, poet, and Pirate Party stalwart Birgitta Jonsdottir; actor and filmmaker Alex Winter; CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou; former Columbia Journalism Review board member, author, and WhoWhatWhy founder Russ Baker; Professor Mano Singham of Case Western University (retired); Professor Robert Tynes of Bard University; author, intelligence critic, and former CIA Directorate of Operations covert asset Barry Eisler; activist-focused criminal defense attorney Jay Leiderman; and Pirate Party International board member Raymond Johansen.

[...]

Over 40 years ago, a vastly criminalized presidential administration was brought down through a combination of leaks, reporting, and Congressional action.

[...]

Do not be taken in, as many were after Watergate, by the idea that a successful dislodging of a criminal presidency will signal renewed commitment to the rule of law.

[...]

Twenty-five years later, two former Nixon administration officials, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, managed to take firm control of yet another presidential administration. This one, too, was marked by revelations of unconstitutional and criminal acts, including torture, mass surveillance, the unprecedented negligence of emergency preparedness functions, the politically motivated firings of U.S. attorneys, and the most disastrous military engagements since Vietnam.

[...]

Rumsfeld understood the real lesson of Watergate: the risks of violating our Constitution are vastly eclipsed by the rewards.

[...]

Ten years later, many now regard the Bush Administration with actual nostalgia.

And 10 years from today, will we look back to 2017 with the same longing?

[...]

It has become more and more difficult, as the years proceed, to maintain the fiction that the American republic is fundamentally sound. An associated myth—that the great majority of the American electorate are decent people who are entirely capable of overseeing the single most powerful apparatus in history—has also become less viable. The "establishment," as we may as well join in terming it, has likewise lost credibility, for reasons ranging from nonsensical to inarguable. The end result is a crisis of moral authority, and even of amoral authority; this is a society that cannot even produce a proper strongman.

[...]

[T]he baseline of 21st century America involves a sort of constitutional police state with unprecedented incarceration rates, increasingly militarized law enforcement, an unaccountable intelligence community with a long history of unconstitutional behavior, and a judicial and legislative culture that, all told, has officially rendered tens of millions of Americans criminals via prohibitions on drugs, prostitution, and gambling.... [...] This is a country that can continue to exist above the level of a fully-mobilized gulag state only to the extent that its laws are not actually enforced.

[...]

What is the proper role, then, for the citizen who takes citizenship seriously, and counts it a duty to defend the rights not just of Americans but of those populations abroad who ultimately bear the brunt of our civic failings?

  Barrett Brown
Continue reading.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Thursday, May 4, 2017

Barrett Brown Reports

Here's Barrett on his recent four-day arrest and detention.  Good to see he hasn't lost his raw sense of humor.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Monday, May 1, 2017

Further on Barrett Brown


Barrett Brown was released from custody on Monday after spending four days at Federal Corrections Institute Seagoville.

[...]

Brown said that he was released soon after his attorneys got in contact with the BOP; a lawsuit would’ve followed in a day or two. “Just the very act of having the US Marshals arrest me without any due process, without any papers, that’s extraordinarily problematic for them. It’s beyond anything they’ve done to me over the past four years.”

  Gizmodo

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Unsurprising, and Welcome



They haven't yet realized they can't fuck with Barrett Brown and win. Or maybe they have NOW.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

OMFG

What country are we living in?
AWARD-WINNING JOURNALIST Barrett Brown was re-arrested and taken into custody Thursday, the day before he was scheduled to be interviewed for a PBS documentary.

Brown quickly became a symbol of the attack on press freedom after he was arrested in 2012 for reporting he did [...] about hacked emails that showed the firm Stratfor spying on activists on behalf of corporations. Brown also helped uncover a proposal by intelligence contractors to hack and smear WikiLeaks defenders and progressive activists.

Faced with the possibility of 100 years in prison, Brown pleaded guilty in 2014 to two charges related to obstruction of justice and threatening an FBI agent, and was sentenced to five years and 3 months. In 2016, Brown won a National Magazine Award for his scathing and often hilarious columns in The Intercept, which focused on his life in prison. He was released in November.

[...]

Neither his mother nor lawyer [Jay Leiderman] has been informed where he is being held.

[...]

According to his mother, Brown had not missed a check-in or failed a drug test since he was released.

[...]

According to his mother, who spoke with Brown by phone after his arrest, Brown believes the reason for his re-arrest was a failure to obtain “permission” to give interviews to media organizations. Several weeks ago, Brown was told by his check-in officer that he needed to fill out permission forms before giving interviews.

Since his release, Brown has given numerous interviews, on camera and by phone. But according to his mother, Brown said that the Bureau of Prisons never informed him about a paperwork requirement.

[...]

Leiderman said he had not been presented with a formal justification for the arrest but was told that it had “to do with failing to abide by BOP restrictions on interviews.” Leiderman called the impromptu media restrictions “disgusting” and said he believed the arrest was an act of reprisal for criticizing the government. “I would call the people who did this a bunch of chicken-shit assholes that are brutalizing the Constitution,” Leiderman said.

  The Intercept
Amen.

Also, the Justice Department is being sued by the legal defense fund Free Barrett Brown, which was set up to help cover Brown's expenses, for monitoring the contributions to the fund in violation of the First Amendment. The now defunct fund may be opening again. And be monitored again.

The Free Barrett Brown website is still up and functioning. I'm sure the DOJ knows who's visiting.

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Happy Release Date, Barrett Brown

Brown's release is scheduled for today at 9am. He has to report to a halfway house by 4 o'clock.




In short, he has to make monthly payments on restitution of approximately $900,000, have his internet usage, his computers and storage media monitored at any time his probation officer might choose, release his provider to give information to the authorities, not use any other computers without permission or any security software that the authorities cannot penetrate. He has served four years in prison. If you need background, click here.


A concluding paragraph bears repeating:
One can’t help but infer that the US Department of Justice has become just another security contractor, working alongside the HBGarys and Stratfors on behalf of corporate bidders, with no sense at all for the justness of their actions; they are working to protect corporations and private security contractors and give them license to engage in disinformation campaigns against ordinary citizens and their advocacy groups. The mere fact that the FBI’s senior cybersecurity advisor has recently moved to Hunton and Williams shows just how incestuous this relationship has become. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice is also using its power and force to trample on the rights of citizens like Barrett Brown who are trying to shed light on these nefarious relationships. In order to neutralize those who question or investigate the system, laws are being reinterpreted or extended or otherwise misappropriated in ways that are laughable—or would be if the consequences weren’t so dire.

  The Nation 




UPDATE:

Sunday, August 21, 2016

They're Turning Barrett Brown Loose



Reportedly to a halfway house in Dallas.  His original release date was April 8, 2017. He's been in custody since September 12, 2012.

Barrett Brown

Monday, January 18, 2016

Still Barrett

Journalist (humorist?) Barrett Brown just won a prestigious writing award.  Brown is serving a 5-year sentence for putting a link in an Anonymous chat room to a document dump containing personal information of employees of the security company Stratfor (which Anonymous hacked and collected company emails  subsequently published by Wikileaks).




Sunday, July 12, 2015

Barrett Brown Reviews Jail

It's really quite amusing.  (He'll soon be writing for The Intercept.)

I didn't realize he's been in so long.  My how time flies.  I wonder if it's flying for Barrett.

Anyway, here's a sample of his writing from prison for you to enjoy this Sunday morning.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, April 4, 2015

He Can't Have Been Too Surprised

After all, he went into prison with this announcement: "Good news!—The U.S. government decided today that because I did such a good job investigating the cyber-industrial complex, they’re now going to send me to investigate the prison-industrial complex."
American journalist Barrett Brown, who is serving over five years in prison for his links to the hacktivist collective Anonymous, had his email suspended for a year after he contacted a journalist about potential wrongdoing by the Bureau of Prisons.

[...]

According to its own policy, the Bureau of Prisons allows inmates access to the TRULINCS prisoner e-mail system with certain restrictions.

“Inmates may send electronic messages to securely, efficiently and economically maintain contact with persons in the community. … [but] the CEO prohibits or discontinues its operation, or individual inmates' participation, whenever it is determined to jeopardize the safety, security, or orderly operation of the correctional facility, or the protection of the public and staff.”

  RT
Or tell on us.

Brown was in contact with Glenn Greenwald when his access was cut off.
According to his support group, Brown still has telephone privileges.
Let’s see how long before he loses those.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

Latest on the Barrett Brown Case

In 2009, Barrett [Brown] founded Project PM, “dedicated to investigating private government contractors working in the secretive fields of cybersecurity, intelligence, and surveillance.” He was particularly instrumental in using documents obtained by the hacktivist collective Anonymous to expose secret collaboration between the government and various contractors. The covert factions Barrett’s work threatened are powerful, and fought back. Two years ago, Barrett was arrested and threatened with 100 years in prison—yes, you read that correctly—allegedly for threatening an FBI agent, concealing evidence, and linking to a website that contained stolen credit card numbers. The allegations themselves are sufficiently preposterous, and the threatened sentence sufficiently draconian, to make it clear that Barrett [...] is in fact being persecuted as an example to anyone else who would dare challenge America’s Deep State.

Eventually, Barrett signed a plea deal on three of the lesser charges against him, the other charges were dropped, and the threatened sentence reduced from over a hundred to eight and a half years. His sentencing hearing has been repeatedly scheduled and then delayed, and is currently set for December 16.

  Barry Eisler at BoingBoing
Brown’s hearing was on December 16, but the judge moved sentencing to January 22.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Friday, March 22, 2013

It's Getting Really Scary Out There

UPDATE: 3/6/2014 - It looks like the charges regarding linking have been dropped.  (Well over a year later.)

We often hear about "political prisoners" in "bad" countries.  And persecution of journalists in those same countries.  And when we do, we gasp and thank heaven we live in such a sterlingly free country.  (PS - click on this link to Reporters Without Borders' annual Press Freedom Index and look for the United States.)

[The] pending federal prosecution of 31-year-old Barrett Brown poses all new troubling risks. That's because Brown - who has been imprisoned since September on a 17-count indictment that could result in many years in prison - is a serious journalist who has spent the last several years doggedly investigating the shadowy and highly secretive underworld of private intelligence and defense contractors, who work hand-in-hand with the agencies of the Surveillance and National Security State in all sorts of ways that remain completely unknown to the public. It is virtually impossible to conclude that the obscenely excessive prosecution he now faces is unrelated to that journalism and his related activism.

[...]

Brown, using the documents obtained by Anonymous, was digging around - with increasing efficacy - in places which National Security and Surveillance State agencies devote considerable energy to concealing.

[...]

In March of last year, Brown's home was raided by the FBI, armed with a search warrant relating to both the HB Gary Federal and the Stratfor leaks. Brown told me they were intent on finding out what he had learned about those firms, particularly HB Gary Federal. Having apparently learned that the FBI agents were coming, Brown went to his mother's home, so the FBI broke down his door and entered his apartment. They seized various documents but could find nothing linking him to either hack, so he was not arrested.

[...]

Over the next several months, FBI agents continued to harass not only Brown but also his mother, repeatedly threatening to arrest her and indict her for obstruction of justice for harboring Brown and helping him conceal documents by letting him into her home.

[...]

In September, he posted a YouTube video detailing that the FBI and HB Gary Federal had threatened to ruin his life, and was particularly incensed about the threats against his mother. Obviously distraught, he said he intended to do the same to the FBI agent making the threats against his mother, FBI agent Robert Smith. While expressly disavowing any intent to physically harm Smith, Brown issued rambling threats to "destroy" Smith.

That was more than enough pretext to allow the FBI to do what they long wanted: arrest Brown.

[...]

In December, the DOJ filed a second indictment, which is now the heart of the government's case against him. It alleged that he "trafficked" in stolen goods, namely the Stratfor documents leaked by Anonymous and published by WikiLeaks.

[...]

[It] simply alleges that he helped "disseminate" the stolen information. He did that, claims the DOJ, when he was in a chat room and posted a link to those documents that were online.

[...]

There are countless legitimate reasons to link to those documents, particularly for a journalist. That this extremely dubious allegation now forms the crux of the DOJ's case against him reveals what a persecution this actually is.

  Glenn Greenwald

So, wouldn't that be true of any news outlet (or blogger) who receives and disseminates information from any leak? Why aren't major news publications racing to his defense? (Rhetorical)

The US government's serial prosecutorial excesses aimed at internet freedom activists, journalists, whistleblowers and the like are designed to crush meaningful efforts to challenge their power and conduct. It is, I believe, incumbent on everyone who believes in those values to do what they can to support those who are taking real risks in defense of those freedoms and in pursuit of real transparency.

[...]

A legal defense fund has been created by several young, smart and committed internet freedom activists [...]. I really hope everyone who is able to do so will donate what they can to his defense fund. You can do that at this link here, or via paypal to freebbfund@gmail.com. All donations will be used exclusively to hire private criminal defense counsel and to fund his defense.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

PPS - Remember the Iraq War Coalition of the Willing and the joke, "Don't forget Eritrea"?  Well, when you're looking up the US in the Press Freedom Index, don't forget Eritrea.

UPDATE: