Showing posts with label Buttigieg-Pete. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Buttigieg-Pete. Show all posts

Monday, June 30, 2025

Trumpism marches on


The center cannot hold.  As Jim Hightower used to say, there's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow lines and dead armadillos.

I've been standing against the conventional wisdom of the Democratic Party pundits who say Democrats need to move toward the center - or, in other words, move right - for years.  And now they have some data that shores up my claim that Democrats need to move left.  It's been obvious for years that moving right is not getting them winning votes.  They've been at the center for decades.  Zohran Mamdani's routing of Andrew Cuomo should tell them something.  Instead, some of the establishment Dems are complaining about his win, and many more are simply not saying anything in support of it.  I hope it's not too late when they realize what's going on.  Bernie Sanders and AOC both endorsed Mamdani.  And I still think that if the Old Guard Democrats (and some younger, promising candidates who should have known better - I'm looking at you, Pete Buttigieg) hadn't banded together to push Bernie out of the 2020 primary when they saw him starting to eclipse them in the polls, he would have been the Democratic candidate, and he would have beat Trump.  We would have been spared Joe Biden, and we might have picked up more Congressional seats on Bernie's coattails, and this would be a very different world.  A much, much better one.




Friday, October 4, 2024

East coast port strike ends after two days



Of course, the Republicans didn't like this being settled.  They were counting on it to drag out through the election.  So, they're smearing Pete Buttigieg.  What a surprise.


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, February 23, 2023

Pete's honeymoon is over

“Pete Buttigieg has taken a lot of bullets for the president on this,” one senior Democrat said Wednesday, insisting on anonymity to talk about a crisis that the person was not authorized to discuss.

[...]

Buttigieg was prepared to speak about the incident if asked, according to the DOT official — but for 10 days, no interviewer asked him.

[...]

Buttigieg acknowledged in a CBS News interview Tuesday that he “could have spoken sooner about how strongly I felt about this incident, and that’s a lesson learned for me.”

  Politico
I might have thought that would have been a lesson learned while he was a mayor in Indiana. He's done a lot of time on Fox News. Surely he knows the character of MAGA. They'd already been debasing him about the airline industry scheduling fiasco and FAA computer failure. He should have known to get out in front of this much bigger disaster and not wait to be asked to talk about it. Lesson learned, indeed. Hope it's not too late.
Three people in Buttigieg’s orbit admit to being exasperated by the furor, saying nobody asked him about the derailment in any of the 23 media interviews he conducted during the first 10 days after the accident. Then critics lambasted him for not speaking sooner.

Since then, conservative media outlets have used images of the Feb. 3 wreck — including the flames, plumes of black smoke and piles of dead fish — to lambaste his oversight of rail safety. They’ve also criticized his failure to visit the crash site.

[...]

The Ohio derailment comes after a series of other transportation-related snarls that have happened on Buttigieg’s watch, including a threatened nationwide rail strike, airline scheduling meltdowns and a Federal Aviation Administration computer failure that grounded flights nationwide. These have brought him unsparing criticism from GOP lawmakers and conservative media outlets, which have portrayed him as overwhelmed by or detached from the job — and mocked his interest in issues such as racial justice and climate change.

[...]

Fox News’ prime-time coverage of the derailment on Tuesday included a Photoshopped image portraying him as a suit-wearing bicyclist grinning in front of the wreckage. Former President Donald Trump weighed in during a visit to East Palestine on Wednesday, telling reporters, “Buttigieg should’ve been here already.”
Come on, folks. You know you can't win the critics wars. Expect it. Deal with it.
Employees of both DOT and EPA were at the scene within hours after the derailment, as were crash investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board. The heads of DOT’s Federal Railroad Administration and the department’s hazardous materials agency visited East Palestine on Wednesday, though their trip was upstaged by Trump’s appearance.
If you're going to go political - go straight to Biden. Which, of course, they have.
[A] White House spokesperson, also called it misguided for Republicans to expect Buttigieg to personally rush to the site of a train wreck.

“It’s like them pretending they think the State Department takes point on rescuing people in the water during hurricanes instead of the Coast Guard,” Bates said. “Case in point, under the last administration EPA was also in the lead on similar derailments.”

[...]

More than 1,000 train derailments happen in the U.S. during a given year, and Transportation secretaries don’t normally go to the scene. Rail safety veteran Bob Lauby said that in his 23 years at the NTSB and the Federal Railroad Administration, he remembers just one time when a secretary visited the site — and it was 30 years ago, when the deadliest incident in Amtrak’s history killed 47 people near Mobile, Ala.

[...]

“During the initial response phase, I’ve followed the norm of staying out of the way of the independent NTSB,” [Buttigieg] tweeted Wednesday. “Now that we’re into the policy phase, I’ll be visiting.”

[...]

Buttigieg also sent a scathing letter to the CEO of Norfolk Southern, the railroad involved in the disaster, for what he called the “vigorous resistance by your industry to increased safety measures.”

Buttigieg’s supporters have accused Republicans of showing only newfound interest in rail safety, noting that Trump’s administration had shelved an Obama-era rule that would have required faster brakes on trains carrying highly flammable materials. (The rule would not have applied to the train that derailed in Ohio, NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy wrote on Twitter last week.) Trump’s DOT also ended regular rail safety audits of railroads and killed a pending rule requiring freight trains to have at least two crew members.

[...]

[W]hen Norfolk Southern or EPA tell communities the air and water are safe, people don’t believe them.

That skepticism hasn’t kept [Michael] Regan, the EPA chief, from getting the warm welcome from Republicans that has eluded Buttigieg. Those include DeWine and others who have met Regan during his two trips to East Palestine.
Regan isn't gay.
Buttigieg met [at the derailment site on Thursday] with U.S. Department of Transportation investigators who, according to Buttigieg's office, were on the ground in East Palestine hours after the train derailed on Feb. 3 near the Pennsylvania border.

[...]

Nearly three weeks later, the burned-out husks of several tanker cars sit off to the side of the railway that travels directly through downtown East Palestine. A strong odor of chemicals permeates the air.

[...]

None of the cars exploded in the derailment, Keltz said. But days after the crash, Norfolk Southern conducted a controlled burn of vinyl chloride to avoid an explosion, releasing hydrogen chloride and the toxic gas phosgene into the air.

[...]

Buttigieg in the wake of the derailment is calling on Norfolk Southern and other rail companies to expedite the implementation of DOT 117 train cars, which are designed to prevent the release of the car's contents if something happens. Companies must have those cars in place by 2029, but the transportation officials want to see it happen sooner.

  MSN
I heard someone discuss the issue with the braking systems that companies have been resisting. The new proposal for brakes would be a system where each and every car has brakes that are all applied in emergency situations, rather than stacking up like dominoes and derailing.
Buttigieg during his visit to this Ohio town near the Pennsylvania border sought to address criticism from some that he should have visited sooner. In a visit to the village on Wednesday, former President Donald Trump described the federal response to the train derailment as a "betrayal."

When questioned by reporters, Buttigieg said he was trying to strike a fine balance between being a public-facing official and giving NTSB room to investigate the incident.
Yes, Trump went to a McDonald's and bought everybody there "a nice meal," and gave people "good" Trump water "and some lesser water." Very helpful. Still, Biden and Buttigieg left themselves open by not visiting the site sooner. I know Biden was busy getting his trip to Ukraine lined up, but you can't turn your back on middle America and expect not to be assaulted for it.
Buttigieg expressed regret for not tweeting about the crash until a week and a half after it happened. "I felt strongly about this and could have expressed that sooner. Again, I was taking pains to respect the role that I have and the role I don’t have but that should not have stopped me from weighing in about how I felt in this community," he said.
Too little, too late, Pete.
“To any national political figure who has decided to get involved with the plight of East Palestine, I have a simple message, which is I need your help," he added. "If you’re serious about this, there is more that we can do to prevent more communities from going through this.”

In addition to stronger rail cars, Buttigieg wants federal officials to increase the maximum fine for railroads that violate safety rules. The figure is currently $225,455, which Buttigieg previously called a "rounding error" for companies that rake in billions of dollars.

Buttigieg also wants Congress to look at how trains are classified when they transport hazardous materials through states. The Norfolk Southern train was not considered a high-hazard flammable train, meaning it could pass through Ohio without any notification to the state.

[...]

"What we have seen is that industry goes to Washington, and they get their way," Buttigieg said.
You want to talk about that rail workers strike the Biden administration shut down, Pete? Those guys that have to work long hours with no - zero - sick days, and too few crew on board, for instance?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

What caused the derailment? The interim report.


UPDATE 02/24/2023:


Too bad he didn't have some Trump air.  

UPDATE 02/25/2023:


That would be James Comer.




Saturday, April 2, 2022

Good one, Pete


Too bad Arkansans won't hear him.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, February 3, 2021

DHS finally has a director

The Senate has confirmed Alejandro Mayorkas to lead the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), making him the first Latino and first immigrant to head the department responsible for enforcing U.S. immigration laws. The Senate on Tuesday confirmed Mayorkas in a 56-43 vote, despite opposition from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell who urged Republicans to vote against Mayorkas’ confirmation due to a 2015 inspector general report that criticized Mayorkas for his mismanagement of a program that granted U.S. residency to foreign investors.

[...]

[S] ix GOP members voted with Democrats to break the filibuster allowing the confirmation to move forward.

[...]

Mayorkas, a Cuban American whose family fled the Fidel Castro-led revolution, served as deputy DHS secretary from 2013 to 2016 under former President Obama. He was also a former U.S. attorney in California and was director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services under the Obama administration.

The confirmation comes as DHS has gone without a Senate-confirmed secretary since former Secretary Kirstjen Nielson left the role in 2019.

Mayorkas was the second Biden Cabinet nominee to be confirmed Tuesday, after senators voted in favor of Pete Buttigieg to head the Department of Transportation. Buttigieg is the first openly gay Senate-confirmed Cabinet member in U.S. history.

  The Hill
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

The Biden administration will include, unsurprisingly, Pete Buttigieg

Buttigieg was instrumental in the Biden campaign, so a place in the administration seemed inevitable.
President-elect Joe Biden will nominate Pete Buttigieg to be his transportation secretary.

[...]

The role of transportation secretary is expected to play a central role in Biden's push for a bipartisan infrastructure package.

[...]

As a presidential candidate, [Buttigieg] rolled out a $1 trillion infrastructure plan that prioritized upgrading the country's crumbling infrastructure and expanding broadband internet access through payment to state and local governments. Buttigieg often spoke about infrastructure on the campaign trail from the perspective of a small mayor, arguing that local governments like the one he once ran needed people in Washington who understood their needs and issues.

[...]

The former mayor was considered for a host of other posts, including US ambassador to the United Nations and commerce secretary.

  CNN

Monday, March 9, 2020

The politicians-as-celebrities is getting out of hand

Elizabeth Warren just made an appearance on SNL, but this...


Is he funny?  I never noticed.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Sunday, March 1, 2020

I did not see that coming

Pete Buttigieg, the 38-year-old openly gay former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, who skyrocketed to the top of the field early in the Democratic nomination race, is dropping his presidential bid, three aides to his campaign confirmed to CBS News on Sunday. Buttigieg, the first openly gay presidential candidate, won the most delegates in the Iowa caucuses and then came in second in the New Hampshire primary, but he struggled to come up with a path forward after coming in third in Nevada and fourth in South Carolina.

Buttigieg was scheduled to attend a town hall Sunday evening in Dallas, but then announced his flight from Selma, Alabama, was being diverted to South Bend, where he planned to make an announcement.

  CBS
I bet Amy Klobuchar is giggling herself silly.

Tom Steyer dropped out, too, but I expected that would happen.

Not my first choice, but Pete made an amazing run, IMO, coming out of nowhere (AKA South Bend, Indiana). We'll probably be seeeing more of him on the national stage in the future.
A big crowd already had gathered on Sunday night for the candidate's scheduled event in Dallas when they learned he was no longer coming.

  alJazeera
Oooh. That's cold. Not a good look.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:




Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Let's do this







Actually, for US elites, that's not a positive thing.  They prefer ignorant citizens.




...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, February 15, 2020

Unbelievable



Shame on Klobuchar and Steyer.  More than shame.  It's a Mexican station, Telemundo, that they're giving an interview!

And that'll raise Pete's standing with Latinos in the US, something he badly needs.

Thursday, February 13, 2020

There may not BE another Iowa caucus


"While it is my desire to stay in this role and see this process through to completion, I do believe it is time for the Iowa Democratic Party to begin looking forward, and my presence in my current role makes that more difficult. Therefore, I will resign as chair of the Iowa Democratic Party effective upon the election of my replacement."

  Axios
Yeah, he wants to stay.  I'm betting he was "asked" to resign.  Perhaps election of his replacement was the hint.
Tom Perez, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, has said he will "absolutely not" consider resigning in the aftermath of the Iowa chaos. He told CNN on Sunday that there will be a conversation within the party about stripping Iowa of its first-in-nation caucus status after this election cycle.
He should have pressured Price harder when it was obvious they were going into the caucus with untested software that required people to bypass their security programs to install on their phones.  Software designed by Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign veterans, (Tara McGowan owns the company - Shadow) and selected "in secret" by the Iowa Democratic Party leaders, costing $63,000.

By the way, McGowan is married to Michael Halle, who is a strategist for Pete Buttigieg's campaign, which also bought software from Shadow to the tune of $42,500.
Donald Trump Jr. took to social media [...] to suggest the DNC was attempting to rig the primary, harkening back to embarrassing 2016 email leaks that showed party leaders favoring Clinton over her primary rival Bernie Sanders. Many swing-state supporters of the Vermont senator then stayed home on Election Day, aiding Trump's narrow victory.

“Yea rigging the primary worked wonders for the Democrats last time,” the president's eldest son wrote in a series of tweets. “And by ‘Quality Control’ they mean fixing the results to get the candidate the Democrat Overlords in DC want.”

  NYT
Brilliant analysis, Junior. How come Bernie and Pete came out on top then?  Hmmmmm....Pete?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, February 6, 2020

Pete Buttigieg from Iowa to New Hampshire

The Iowa caucuses remain unsettled, but with almost 75 percent of the vote tallied as of Wednesday afternoon, Buttigieg has a small lead over Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). Perhaps more importantly, Buttigieg far exceeded expectations and is likely to finish well ahead of former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who represent his biggest obstacles to becoming the party’s centrist standard-bearer.

Sanders will still enter the Granite State as the prohibitive favorite. But New Hampshire Democrats say a top-two or top-three finish for Buttigieg, in which he comes out ahead of his moderate rivals, could be enough to burnish his case as the strongest centrist and best-positioned alternative to Sanders.

The stakes are high for Buttigieg, as the primary calendar will then turn from predominantly white states to more racially diverse states, where he has struggled to connect with voters of color.

[...]

One big question around Buttigieg’s campaign is whether he’ll get a bump from Iowa that is consistent with past caucus winners.

The delay in reporting results and the media frenzy around the botched caucuses may have come at a cost to Buttigieg, according to Joe Trippi, a veteran Democratic campaign hand who has worked on several presidential and congressional races in New Hampshire.

[...]

“Voters are very focused on figuring out which candidate they think can beat Trump, and he’s got to demonstrate that he has the experience and maturity to be president,” said Jim Demers, a Democratic strategist in New Hampshire who is backing Biden.

  The Hill
Why? Trump didn't have to, and he had neither of those characteristics.

But, speaking of the Iowa fiasco...
A hotline that was used by Iowa precinct chairs to report Democratic caucus results was reportedly flooded with calls on Monday from President Trump supporters after the number was posted online, elongating the delays in the vote tallying process, sources told Bloomberg.

[...]

In a text message to Bloomberg, Tim Murtaugh — Trump's campaign spokesperson — said: “Don’t know anything about that but maybe Democrats should consider using an app of some kind next time."

  The Hill
Nasty bunch.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:


Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Talk about your low information voter...


I wonder how she decided on Pete in the first place.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Yeah, Pete's not going to get the nomination

Because he won't be getting black votes.  And I think he may be blocked from anything in a Democratic administration because of it.




Here's the story.

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

Buttigieg surge

It's not just Iowa.
Democratic White House hopeful Pete Buttigieg surged to a 10-point lead in New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation presidential primary, according to a new Saint Anselm College poll released Tuesday. Buttigieg gets the support of 25 percent of self-identified likely Democratic primary voters, marking the first time the South Bend, Ind., mayor has emerged atop a poll in the Granite State. Former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) are tied for second at 15 percent, while no other candidate breaks double digits. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) sits in third place at 9 percent.

[...]

The Indiana mayor held a 9-point lead in this week’s Des Moines Register-CNN-Mediacom survey, which is considered the gold standard in the Hawkeye State.

[...]

And while some donors and voters continue to express skepticism that the 37-year-old mayor from Indiana can unseat Trump, Tuesday’s poll shows Buttigieg with a 7-point lead over the president in a hypothetical match-up.

  The Hill
He's still not doing well in the south with black voters. Which is understandable. But if he's blowing Biden away in whiter states, he may just well get the nomination.

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Oh, Pete, say it isn't so

Pete Buttigieg just keeps going down in my esteem.
The South Bend, Indiana, mayor polls close to zero nationally with African Americans, faring no better with that vote in South Carolina, a liability that he knows will thwart his nomination if he can’t turn it around.

[...]

Buttigieg has strived mightily to win support among the black community, especially on his home turf. His firing of South Bend’s first black police chief when he entered office in 2012 set off protests at the time, and Buttigieg wrote in his memoir that the controversy “affected my relationship with the African-American community in particular for years to come.” This past June, in the middle of his presidential campaign, Buttigieg returned home after a police officer gunned down a black man in South Bend. An exchange between a black constituent and Buttigieg at a tense demonstration has dogged his campaign ever since.

“You’re running for president, and you want black people to vote for you?” the woman said. “That’s not going to happen.”

“Ma’am, I’m not asking for your vote,” Buttigieg responded.
Yeah, that was particularly egregious. I saw the clips, and I don't remember him even saying "Ma'am".
In July, he released his campaign’s chief piece of policy outreach to black voters, called “The Douglass Plan: A Comprehensive Investment in the Empowerment of Black America.” The plan covers everything from criminal justice reform to public health care, education, and beyond. It proposes using federal contracting rules to increase the amount of contracts going to minority- and women-owned firms to 25 percent, and offers student loan deferment and forgiveness to Pell Grant recipients who go on to start businesses that employ at least three people.

  The Intercept
Sounds pretty good. What's the problem?
To build support for the plan, Buttigieg and his staff lobbied prominent black South Carolinians to endorse it in order to strengthen the cause of racial justice. The Washington Post reported on Monday that “Buttigieg persuaded hundreds of prominent black South Carolinians to sign onto the plan even if they are not supporting Buttigieg himself.”

Along with his release of the plan, his campaign directed consultants to convene focus groups with undecided black voters in South Carolina. The resulting research memo, finalized in late July, concluded that Buttigieg’s sexuality was a “barrier” to winning support among black voters. The memo was leaked to the press this fall. Though the campaign has since denied that it was the source of the leak, the initial article about the memo, published on October 22 by McClatchy, includes on-the-record quotes from the Buttigieg campaign — the type that customarily accompany a story that a campaign cooperates with. A spokesperson said that the campaign only cooperated after McClatchy had already obtained the memo.

Three days later, the Buttigieg campaign began promoting a list of 400 South Carolinian supporters of his Douglass Plan in emails to reporters and posts on social media.

[...]

The supporters were rolled out in a press release and open letter published in the HBCU Times — which focuses on “positive news related to Historically Black Colleges and Universities.” Listed at the top of the press release were three prominent supporters, Columbia City Councilwoman Tameika Devine; Rehoboth Baptist pastor and state Rep. Ivory Thigpen; and Johnnie Cordero, chair of the state party’s Black Caucus.

[...]

The blowback came immediately. Devine, who has not endorsed a candidate yet in the presidential election, told The Intercept that she did not intend her support for the plan to be read as an endorsement for Buttigieg’s candidacy.

[...]

“Clearly from the number of calls I received about my endorsement, I think the way they put it out there wasn’t clear, that it was an endorsement of the plan, and that may have been intentionally vague. I’m political, I know how that works,” she said. “I do think they probably put it out there thinking people wouldn’t read the fine print or wouldn’t look at the details or even contact the people and say, ‘Hey, you’re endorsing Mayor Pete?’”

[...]

Thigpen, meanwhile, has endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders for president, and was startled when he learned the campaign had not only attached his name to the plan, but also listed him as one of three prominent supporters atop the letter.

[...]

'[E]ven though I had had conversations with the campaign [...] I thought I made it clear to them, that I was a strong Bernie Sanders supporter — actually co-chair of the state, and I was not seeking to endorse their candidate or the plan. But what I had talked about was potentially giving them a quote of support in continuing the conversation, because I do think it’s a very important conversation.”

Thigpen said he thought rolling out the big list of supporters was intended to show broad support in the black community, despite the reality. The letter was published out of the blue, Thigpen said. “I actually had not circled back to give them a quote, so I was alarmed and very much surprised to see, particularly, the headline as such because I do think it muddies the water, I do think it was a misrepresentation, and it easily could have confused a lot of people as to where I stood."

[...]

Johnnie Cordero is no longer listed publicly as a supporter. When The Intercept reached him for comment, he explained that he had never endorsed the plan, nor has he endorsed Buttigieg. “I never endorsed that plan. I don’t know how my name got on there."

[...]

"It’s presumptuous to think you can come up with a plan for black America without hearing from black folk. There’s nothing in there that said black folk had anything to do with the drafting of that plan. Now I like Pete, please don’t get me wrong. I’ll help him in any way I can. I think he’s an honest man, I think he’s a decent man, I think he has integrity. I’d like to see him keep running. But you don’t do that. Those days are over and done with. We’re tired of people telling us what we need. You wanna find out what we need? Come and ask us.”

[...]

Cordero said he repeatedly asked Buttigieg’s staff for details on how the plan was developed. “What I was talking back and forth with them about was, who drafted the plan? I know Pete didn’t draft the plan. I’m sure he had his advisers do it. But I wanna know who was involved in this plan such that you can claim that you speak for black America. The long and the short of it was they never sufficiently answered my questions, so I never actually endorsed the plan. They went ahead and used my name,” Cordero said.
Not good, Pete. Not good.  Your campaign IS you.
The campaign hasn’t publicly claimed that every supporter of the plan listed is African American, though it wouldn’t be hard to draw that implication: It was published in the HBCU Times, and the bylines and top-listed supporters are all black. To be sure, a multiracial coalition would be needed to push the Douglass Plan through Congress, but the campaign didn’t say that, either.

After publication, the Buttigieg campaign said it had sent the plan to the list of supporters and asked them to opt out if they did not want their name included on the list.
WTF? You call those people and ask. That's really slippery.
That email also specified that the list was meant to represent “over 400 Black South Carolinians.”
And half of them were found to be whites.
Meanwhile [...] seven [names] are repeated; one of them appears three times. According to a review of public record databases and social media sites, multiple names on the list appear to be from people who do not live in South Carolina. One person seems to not live in the United States at all but in São Paulo, Brazil.

Two others may be badly misspelled at best, as they don’t appear anywhere online or in voter databases. [One hundred and twenty-five] can’t be found in the voter file.

[...]

The Buttigieg campaign said that they have never claimed the list was exclusively prominent black South Carolinians, and that it’s important to have a multiracial coalition to support the end goal of racial justice. “Pete believes we need to dismantle systemic racism in order to deliver justice for Black Americans and make our country whole,” a Buttigieg spokesperson said. “Which is why, as we said the time of its release, we’re proud the Douglass plan has earned the support of many South Carolinians, including many African-Americans. Pete will continue to talk about the Douglass Plan wherever he goes, regardless of the audience, as there are many communities of Americans committed to eradicating racial inequity.”
Pete's going to have to do some serious defensive work at the next debate.

And he started out looking so good.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.