Showing posts with label FBI mistakes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FBI mistakes. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

The Whole Thing Stinks to High Heaven

In a Washington Post article titled Sessions’s testimony highlights Trump’s deep lack of interest in what Russia did in 2016 that exerpts Trump's past comments and actions, there's the bit about him saying this: "Why wouldn’t Podesta and Hillary Clinton allow the FBI to see the server? They brought in another company that I hear is Ukrainian-based."

I have that same question. It seems highly suspect and totally un-FBI-like. Why would the FBI take the word of someone they're investigating and the analysis of a third party rather than confiscate the computers and run their own investigation of them? Believe me, if those computers belonged to you or me, they would have hauled them off to an FBI lab.

At any rate...
The AP’s Julie Pace asked whether [Trump] meant Crowdstrike, the firm that detailed Russia’s involvement in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee. “That’s what I heard,” Trump said. “I heard it’s owned by a very rich Ukrainian, that’s what I heard.” This is not true.

  WaPo
This is a stupid and yet consistent Trump tactic to get a lie into the public arena: "That's what I heard." From the voices in his head, no doubt. It's a lie he's selling, and it's a lie that he heard it. Two lies in one.
Speaking to NBC’s Lester Holt shortly after the firing of Comey, Trump [...] said that he was worried about lengthening the investigation by firing Comey, but that he had to “do the right thing for the American people.”
Yes, it's obvious. Trump wants only to do what's right for the American people. And, by the way, want to buy a bridge?
When not explaining the firing of Comey to a reporter on national television, though, there’s no indication that Trump’s efforts to “get to the bottom” of the hacking involved any actual interest in the investigation.

At the end of May, Trump offered his most recent opinion on the alleged interference.
Russian officials must be laughing at the U.S. & how a lame excuse for why the Dems lost the election has taken over the Fake News. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 30, 2017
They indeed must be laughing at the US. Hysterically and in terror. Just like we are.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

Freezing Them Out - Part 2

Wednesday 1/6 at the Malheur Constitutional Freedom compound:
Six lumbering men sat around a TV in an adjacent lounge room, jeering at a Fox News TV report on their standoff. They insisted that a federal government plan to cut power only steeled their resolve. They have enough propane and generators, they said, to last the winter.

[...]

[A] plan to turn off power at the site [has] run into snags. Local power officials [...] said the move would also cut power to several surrounding ranches and that the only way to isolate the wildlife refuge would be to send men to the site to cut the local lines.

  Guardian
So, the militia is not even going to have to use its generators.  (Which idiot leaked that plan to the press in the first place?  Now the feds just look silly.  Sillier.)
On Tuesday, the bunkhouse breakfast room felt like a hunting lodge, with wives and girlfriends serving meals while working-class men with beards, flannel shirts and dour expressions milled about.

[...]

Late Monday, [Neil Wampler, a 68-year-old retired woodworker from central California,] said ranchers arrived with enough meat to fill four industrial refrigerators, replenishing the group’s diminishing supplies.
So, now they don't even have to hunt game on the land.
Wampler, who joined Bundy’s 2014 armed standoff with BLM officials at the ranch outside Las Vegas, said the wildlife refuge offers hot showers, comfortable beds and, on Monday night, a spaghetti and sausage dinner with a vegetable salad and homemade biscuits.

“Man, that dinner was good,” he said. “When I was at the Bundy ranch, we lit a fire on a propane stove in an outdoor shed and washed our dishes in a ditch. But I could get used to this.”

[...]

Moments later, a militia member drove past in a federal government truck with a US Fish and Wildlife Service insignia on the side.

Wampler smiled: “We found some keys lying around.”
Yep, they're really struggling against far superior federal officials out there.
“Listen, the potential of violence is on everyone’s mind here,” said Burns’s mayor, Craig LaFollette. “We want this to end peacefully. But even without violence, these outsiders have disrupted our lives here, closed our schools. It’s time for these people to leave."
Well, to be accurate, Mr. Mayor, you closed the schools.
“An ongoing siege could break a county like this one,” said Randy Fulton, one of the attendees of the closed-door gathering. “Nobody wants this to continue.”

Fulton, 60, a lifelong Burns resident and a leading businessman who owns the town’s weekly newspaper, the Burns Times-Herald, said the standoff is hurting his town.
I don't think siege is the proper word for what those guys are doing out there.  They don't seem to have anyone surrounded. And, the local hotel owner is probably not complaining.  Nor the diners.
As legions of federal law enforcement officials arrive here – one hotel manager said 40 of 114 rooms are rented by federal officials – local businessmen worry the emerging battle lines will discourage visitors and keep workers at home.
Yeah. No.

Workers will go to work, because they can't afford not to, and they are not under any threat. And winter in way-the-hell-out-there-ville probably doesn't attract many visitors. Those 40 rooms are probably at least 30 more than that hotel would otherwise have rented out at this time. And maybe even 40 more.  And how many rooms do the press masses rent?


Michael Stettler, a 49-year-old electrician who arrived on Monday from a nearby county, said he wasn’t “ready to take a bullet”. “If the federals move in and offer a chance to leave, I’m leaving,” he said.
Seriously, dude. Why are you there? For the meals?
Locals at [a recent] meeting demanded to know why federal officials are allowing the militia to come into town to restock supplies.
Now that is a good question.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

Sunday, July 19, 2015

Regarding Chattanooga

Another actual attack that the NSA, nor the FBI, nor the CIA, nor any other "protective" agency managed to see coming or thwart, even with unlimited access to US citizens' private lives.

However, there are still plenty of FBI-aided, entrapped and mentally retarded terrorists they've saved us from.

And, the question is:  although media reporters have christened the killings in Chattanooga so, is it really terrorism?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Speaking of FBI "Stings"



Are we sure they have a perfect record?

And if so, it's a dicey game they're playing.  Hopefully when their record is broken, their plot won't have been anything grand enough to cause much damage.

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Charlie Pierce Asking the Right(er) Question

The Republicans have grown giddy over this Fast And Furious business, a truly terrible initiative by which firearms were loosed upon the streets in the hope that they would find their way to drug dealers we would very much like to arrest, and a tactic pioneered, you will not be surprised to learn, by various brainiacs in the employ of the Bush Administration.

[...]

Republicans led by Rep. Darrell (Everyone's As Dirty As Me) Issa uncrated his outrage and has been hauling Attorney General Eric Holder up before his investigating committee fairly regularly over the past two years, hoping to find something (anything!) that would tie Holder to the killing of a border agent, and seeking to hang the entire responsibility for this truly idiotic strategy around Holder's neck.

[...]

Now, Issa's threatening to hold Holder in contempt of Congress on June 20, and Holder's warning darkly of a "constitutional crisis," as though we haven't been living in the midst of one of those since the resolution of the 2000 election.

[...]

The "gun-walking" strategies that began under the last administration have been buried in the Crawford underbrush, which must be quite thick these days now that nobody's around to clear it any more. (And, coincidentally, it comes just as Holder's Justice Department is moving on voter-suppression in places like Florida, about which more later today.) The way you know that is that nobody — except, as always, Charlie Savage in the New York Times — is asking the real question anymore. Which is, basically, who dealt this mess? Somebody should have recognized this as being a bad idea right from jump. And, riddle me this: How does this differ in its basic law-enforcement philosophy from all the scams the spooks are running wherein they find some guy in a bar who wants to bring down the Great Satan personally, and our gumshoes feed him a line about RPG's and Semtex, and the guy shouts "Huzzah!" and starts making plans, and then winds up in Pelican Bay doing life plus 20 years? How long will it be before one of those clever plots goes badly wrong and the guy the spooks find isn't as stupid and hopeless as the guys they've found so far have been? How long before we have a "gun-walking" plot that winds up with a bomb? And what will happen if it does?

  Charlie Pierce

Monday, February 6, 2012

Mistakes Were Made

In Fitchburg, Massachusetts, Judy Sanchez was at home with her three-year-old daughter when she heard pounding on her door. Before she could do anything, a chainsaw suddenly came tearing through the door and agents then kicked in the remainder with guns drawn. It then got worse . . .

The agents ordered Sanchez to the floor and would not let her go and get her daughter who was crying in the next room. They did tell her to grab her pit bull puppy, which proceeded to pee out of fear. She lay in the dog’s urine for over thirty minutes before the agents realized that they were looking for apartment 2f. She lives in apartment 2R.

Of course, it might have been difficult to read the apartment number since they just chainsawed the front door.

She said that she received a rather perfunctory apology and “Here’s the phone number for your landlord to get reimbursed for the door, have a good day.”

  Jonathan Turley