Showing posts with label Build Back Better bill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Build Back Better bill. Show all posts

Thursday, January 20, 2022

Pathetic

The Republicans, of course, get the lion's share of blame for the country going authoritarian, but I also blame the voters and the Dems.
Senate Democrats failed to advance two voting rights bills last night after Republicans blocked a floor vote and Democrats couldn't manage to unite in a push to change Senate rules to sidestep the opposition.

Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona joined all Senate Republicans to preserve the filibuster by a vote of 52-48.

[...]

With voting rights stalled, congressional Democrats are now looking to revive President Biden's domestic policy and spending plan, also known as Build Back Better.

The $1.7 trillion package stalled in December after Manchin said that he couldn't back it. Biden conceded at yesterday's press conference that "we're going to have to probably break it up" and pass pieces of the bill in smaller "chunks."

  NPR
Not sure why they didn't start out that way. It would have been much better for them to do it piecemeal and claim a win every time something passed. Also, something might have passed.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, December 23, 2021

Richest country on earth

At Christmastime.
Hunger is rising this holiday season with the U.S. Census Bureau estimating more than 21 million Americans didn't have enough to eat in early December as pandemic relief payments run out and grocery prices rise.

[...]

Grocery prices in the U.S. are up 6.4% from a year earlier. Food banks are also seeing a rise in demand, and clinics meant to help malnourished and underfed children have seen an increase in patients.

[...]

Low-income families may soon face more pressure with monthly child tax credit payments ending and the Senate deadlocked on legislation to extend the program backed by President Joe Biden.

[...]

The last of the scheduled payments for the expanded child tax credit were sent out on Dec. 15. The Build Back Better Act includes language that would extend payments through 2022. The bill’s status is up in the air, however, after Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, on Sunday said that he would not vote for it.

  Bloomberg
We need to start presenting Scrooge as Manchin.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 12/24:

And there it is...



Wednesday, December 22, 2021

Tuesday, December 21, 2021

Some people are actually maggots

In Sen. Joe Manchin III’s hilly West Virginia home county, his family’s business has made millions by taking waste coal from long-abandoned mines and selling it to a power plant that emits air pollution at a higher rate than any other plant in the state.

That enterprise could have taken a hit under a key part of President Biden’s climate agenda, a $150 billion plan to push coal plants toward cleaner energy. One lawmaker, though, played a central role in killing that proposal: Manchin, who has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars annually from the family coal company while using his role as a Democratic swing vote in a 50-50 Senate to dictate Biden’s policies.

[...]

When pressed about whether he has a conflict of interest, Manchin bristles. “I have been in a blind trust for 20 years. I have no idea what they’re doing,” the senator told reporters in September, referring to his family’s coal firm. “You got a problem?”

  WaPo
As a matter of fact, I do.
Manchin’s latest financial disclosure report says that the West Virginia family coal business that he helped found and run, Enersystems, paid him $492,000 in interest, dividends and other income in 2020, and that his share of the firm is worth between $1 million and $5 million. He signed a sworn statement saying he is aware of these earnings, underscoring that he is not blind to them.

[...]

Manchin set up a blind trust with $350,000 in cash in 2012. In his latest financial disclosure report, the senator reported that the Joseph Manchin III Qualified Blind Trust earned no more than $15,000 last year and is worth between $500,000 and $1 million. By design, it is not possible to know precisely what’s in the blind trust. But the financial disclosure records show that it doesn’t include all of Manchin’s income from Enersystems.
Well, what a surprise.
[I]t calls into question the impartiality of a senator who in October forced Biden to drop the plan in his Build Back Better bill to phase out the same kinds of coal plants that are key to his family company’s profitability.

[...]

“The question I would ask him would be, when he says it’s in a blind trust, ‘Well, your public financial disclosure report that you sign and swear is true does not have Enersystems in the blind trust,’ ” Fox said. “And if the blind trust is truly blind, how do you know what’s in it?”

[...]

It is legal for Manchin to make millions of dollars from his coal interests even as he chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and legislates on matters affecting the industry. That is because members of Congress are not required to divest their assets to avoid a potential industry conflict.

[...]

Between 2011 and 2020, Manchin earned $4.8 million from Enersystems, according to a tally by the Center for Responsive Politics. His net worth as of 2020 was between $4.4 million and $12.8 million, the center said.

[...]

Compared with ordinary coal plants, power plants that burn waste coal, or what the industry calls “gob,” are dirtier and don’t generate as much electricity. The Grant Town plant emits more greenhouse gases and the main components of acid rain — nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide — into the air per megawatt-hour of electricity produced than any other power plant in West Virginia, according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s most recent data. Only a handful of waste-coal-burning plants still operate nationally. They are such heavy polluters that the Trump administration created a separate category for them, weakening the air pollution standards they had to meet.

[...]

Holman said Manchin’s financial position is one of the most conflicted of any member of Congress he has studied because so much of the senator’s financial stake is in the coal industry while he is playing a key role on climate policies. Nonetheless, he said, “what Manchin is doing is not illegal. The conflict of interest code for Congress is just way too weak.”
What say we fix that? No wonder they haven't wanted to press Trump for all his shady self-dealing.
West Virginia’s embrace of coal power over less expensive alternatives like gas, wind and solar has contributed to a decade of rising electricity bills. According to Van Nostrand’s analysis, between 2010 and 2019 West Virginians’ electricity costs increased about five times more than the national average.
Jesus Christ. Not just polluting West Virginians, but shafting them as well.
Around the time Manchin helped kill the clean electricity provision, he was asked during a walk with reporters on Capitol Hill about whether he has a conflict of interest and was pressed on the fact that his son runs the family coal company. Manchin responded, “I’m very proud of my son. He does a good job. You’d do best to change the subject now.”
And West Virginians would do best to recall their senator.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:  


Exactly.

Monday, December 20, 2021

Sunday, December 19, 2021

West Virginians need to pay a visit to their senator on Christmas

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Sen. Joe Manchin’s (D-W.Va.) opposition to President Biden's social spending package was "a breach of his commitments" calling his reversal on the bill "inexplicable."

“Senator Manchin’s comments this morning on FOX are at odds with his discussions this week with the President, with White House staff, and with his own public utterances,” Psaki said in a statement on Sunday shortly after Manchin told Fox's Brett Baier that he was a "no" on the legislation.

It was the first time Manchin said firmly where he stood on the bill after months of wrangling with lawmakers and the White House to come up with an agreeable framework.

[...]

Manchin announced on “Fox News Sunday” that he would not vote for Biden’s climate and social spending bill, confirming “this is a no on this legislation.” He cited concerns with inflation, the $29 trillion federal debt and a surge in new infections caused by the omicron COVID-19 variant as reasons for his position.

Psaki said the White House will continue to press Manchin on the bill and see if he will “reverse his position yet again” and “be true to his word.”

  The Hill
Yeah, good luck with that.


As Manchin said, if you want more progressive policies, elect more progressive Democrats.


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:



UPDATE:


There are better reasons to reject the Democratic Party.  The problem is, with our current system, there's only one other party capable of holding power - and that's the New Fascist Party, aka GOP.

UPDATE:


Progressives are hated only slightly less by "moderate" Democrats ("Beltway" Democrats) than by Republicans.

White House statement on Manchin:


More here


UPDATE:






Projecting much, Joe?

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Switching gears


I guess they finally gave up trying to get Manchin on board.

This is okay for now, IF they're going to go at it hard and not wimp out on it.  That's a very big IF.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, November 20, 2021

Build Back Better passes House

And this is how you message that:


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, November 18, 2021

McConnell under the bus - or more aptly, the Trump tank

Former President Trump ripped into Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) once again on Wednesday, giving the leader an invective-filled ultimatum to stand firm against raising the debt ceiling and keep his conference unified against President Biden’s spending agenda.

Trump blasted his former Senate ally as “stupid” and a “fool” and accused him of “incompetence” in a long, tangled statement that jumped from expressing displeasure over Republican votes on a procedural motion related to raising the debt limit in October, to Congress’s passage of the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill this month, to the ongoing Democratic talks over a social spending bill.

Trump’s scathing statement follows several similar attacks in recent days in which he lashed out at “Old Crow” McConnell.

[...]

“McConnell is a fool and he damn well better stop their ‘Dream of Communism Bill’ and keep his Senators in line, or he should resign now, something he should have done a long time ago. Use the Debt Ceiling like it should have been used, you Old Broken Crow, to do so would hurt our Country far less than this horrible Bill,” Trump declared in a statement released through his Save America PAC.

  The Hill
Swell guy that orange man.

No dout McConnell is fielding his share of death threats these days. It was bound to happen.
[McConnell] defended his vote for the infrastructure bill on Tuesday by noting it “did not raise taxes, did not revisit the 2017 tax bill.”

“From the Kentucky point of view, it was extremely good for our state. I’m proud of my vote,” he said.

[...]

“Mitch McConnell couldn’t stop the first Bill so 19 Senators, including himself, joined in. That’s what he does—if you can’t beat them, join them. If he wasn’t so stupid and didn’t give the two-month extension, he could have stopped it all. Now he and his RINO friends will allow a much bigger and far worse Bill to pass, ruining our Country while giving the Democrats a great political lift, all at the same time,” [Trump] said.

McConnell has refused to respond to Trump’s attacks and regularly deflects them by saying he’s more focused on fighting what he sees as the most extreme elements of Biden’s agenda, such as $550 billion in new spending to fight climate change.
Yes, McConnell is still a piece of shit.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Saturday, November 13, 2021

The government giveth and the government taketh away

Old-timers might get hearing coverage, but their premiums will be gouging them.  So, IF it passes, some seniors will MAYBE break even by getting hearing aids, but those who don't need aids (or have alzheimer's) will be paying for it.
Seniors on Medicare will have to pay more than $20 more per month extra in premiums next year, a large increase that officials in part attributed to possible coverage of a pricey and controversial new Alzheimer's drug.

  The Hill
And of course, it's the pharmaceutical companies who get the benefits.
About half of that increase is due to contingency planning to make sure the program has enough money to pay for an expensive new Alzheimer's drug, if Medicare decides to cover it, an official at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said.
Could it be worse? Yes. And it is.
That drug, called Aduhelm and made by the company Biogen, has drawn controversy both for its price, at $56,000 per year, and because the Food and Drug Administration approved it despite doubts from experts about its effectiveness.
But wait. Seniors are getting a cost-of-living increase. It just won't be as large as it would have been.
Administration officials emphasized Friday that most people on Medicare will also be getting a large cost of living increase in their Social Security payments next year, which they said would more than offset the rise in Medicare costs for many seniors.
"Most". "Large".
"Skyrocketing drug prices not only make it harder for seniors to afford the lifesaving drugs they need, but also drive up their health care premiums for doctor’s visits and outpatient care," House Energy and Commerce Chairman Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.) said in response to the announcement.

"This double financial whammy simply cannot continue, and that’s why Congress must pass the bicameral Medicare prescription drug agreement that was included in the Build Back Better Act last week."
Yeah? Allowing Medicare to negotiate for reasonable prices was taken out, wasn't it?
In early budget negotiations, it looked as if the Democrats were finally going to take on Big Pharma over spiraling drug prices. Then last week, drug pricing fell out of the bill altogether and it looked as if the drug companies had won again. Now there is a compromise that looks modest but could have real bite.

The drug price regulation Congress is now considering would achieve three main goals. It would limit the amount that Medicare patients can be asked to pay for drugs out-of-pocket. It would restrict how much drugmakers can increase their prices each year. And, for the first time, it would allow Medicare to negotiate directly with drugmakers on prices for their medications.

The provision on price negotiation was the one most substantially changed in the last week: It would apply to fewer drugs, require smaller discounts, and, most critically, shield new drugs from negotiations.

  NYT
So, I wonder which drugs they can negotiate on.
The policy isn’t simply smaller than the original. If enacted, it will save the federal government less money than the legislation passed by the House two years ago. But it is also less likely to hinder the development of new treatments and cures, the experts said.
Great. New drugs only the rich can afford.
The bill text could, of course, change or fail to become law.
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.