Showing posts with label PCLOB. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PCLOB. Show all posts

Thursday, January 23, 2025

Trump 2.0 - Intelligence

The PCLOB is an independent agency whose mission is the oversight of the intelligence community. Created by Congress, its 5-person board must be bipartisan, reflecting the congressional view that oversight is an apolitical function in which both parties should be invested. I know from my own time working for the FBI as its General Counsel that the Board was an indispensable and important body for conducting valuable oversight. The board asked tough questions (regardless of party) and conducted thorough reviews.

[...]

The tsunami of executive orders emanating from the Trump White House can result in our missing something important. A “small” story about the removal of the three Democrats on the Private and Civil Liberties Board (PCLOB) is ominous. Their removal immediately results in the 5-member oversight board becoming inoperable. It now has four vacant seats and one remaining member, who cannot take any action as of now.

  Just Security


...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Oh, Bother

An independent executive branch board has concluded that the National Security Agency’s long-running program to collect billions of Americans’ phone records is illegal and should end.

In a strongly worded report to be issued Thursday, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (PCLOB) said that the statute upon which the program was based, Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act, “does not provide an adequate basis to support this program.”

[...]

The board had shared its conclusions with Obama in the days leading up to his speech.

  WaPo
Which he chose to ignore.
“We have not identified a single instance involving a threat to the United States in which the telephone records program made a concrete difference in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation,” said the report, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post. “Moreover, we are aware of no instance in which the program directly contributed to the discovery of a previously unknown terrorist plot or the disruption of a terrorist attack.”

[...]

“At its core, the approach boils down to the proposition that essentially all telephone records are relevant to essentially all international terrorism investigations,” the report said. This approach, it said, “at minimum, is in deep tension with the statutory requirement that items obtained through a Section 215 order be sought for ‘an investigation,’ not for the purpose of enhancing the government’s counterterrorism capabilities generally.”

The board, which was established at the urging of the 9/11 commission, was not unanimous on the issue of ending bulk collection. Two members concluded that the program, if modified to include additional privacy protections, should continue. The two were Rachel L. Brand and Elisebeth Collins Cook, who served in the Justice Department in the George W. Bush administration. The three members who urged an end to the program are Chairman David Medine, a former Federal Trade Commission official in the Clinton administration; James X. Dempsey, a public policy expert with the privacy group, the Center for Democracy & Technology; and Patricia M. Wald, a retired federal appeals court judge named to the bench by President Jimmy Carter.