Showing posts with label military attacks on civilians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military attacks on civilians. Show all posts

Sunday, August 3, 2025

Not Putin, Stalin

Trump has already enmeshed the United States military in domestic law enforcement operations involving immigration to an unprecedented degree. He has authorized a major military buildup at the border. He has maximized the use of military planes for deportations, complete with the White House pumping out imagery of migrants getting frog-marched onto souped-up military aircraft. He sent the National Guard into Los Angeles amid large-scale protests there—and then sent in the Marines.

But an internal memo circulated inside the Department of Homeland Security suggests that Trump’s use of the military for domestic law enforcement on immigration could soon get worse.

  New Republic
In case you missed it, Philip Hegseth is Pete's brother.
Positive outcomes and/or action items include:

The U.S. military leadership (the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and NORTHCOM) need to feel — for the first time — the urgency of the homeland defense mission. They need to understand the threat, what’s at stake, and the political importance the administration has placed on this issue.

A verbal agreement to find places where DoD can detail personnel within ICE and CBP (and vice-versa) to increase information sharing, and specifically support nationwide operational planning capabilities.

A clear understanding of each department’s capabilities, limitations and shared objectives.

[...]

The mere fact that this meeting is happening with these participants illustrates just how urgent and cooperative the homeland mission has become. This is a priority of POTUS.

[...]

We’ve got Central and South American cartels and gangs trafficking drugs, humans, and terror into American cities at will

These same Transnational Criminal Organizations have now been designated by this administration as Foreign Terrorist Organization’s [sic].

That puts this threat on the same plain [sic] as having Al Qaeda or ISIS cells and fighters operating freely inside America.

Everyone here is also aware of our joint work in L.A.

It hasn’t been perfect, and we’re still working through best practices together, but I think it’s a good indicator of the type of operations (and resistance) we’re going to be working through for years to come.

[...]

To Make America Safe Again, DHS and DoD will need to be in lockstep with each other.

[...]

Due to the sensitive nature of the meeting, minimal written policy or background information can be provided in this briefing memo.
Don't bother saying it's illegal to use the military for domestic policing. Waste of breath. There is no rule of law in this country now. There is only rule of Trump.
“The memo is alarming, because it speaks to the intent to use the military within the United States at a level not seen since Japanese internment,” Carrie Lee, senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund, told me. “The military is the most powerful, coercive tool our country has. We don’t want the military doing law enforcement. It absolutely undermines the rule of law.”
What did I just say, Carrie?
“It’s disturbing to see DHS officials pressuring the U.S. military to turn its focus inward even further,” Joseph Nunn, counsel for the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center, told me. Nunn said this suggests “military involvement in domestic civilian law enforcement” is about to get “more common.”

Also, somebody leaked.  And maybe they don't care in this instance.  Scaring people is a big factor in fascism.

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Hearing Thursday regarding Military in LA

A federal judge declined California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D) request to issue an emergency order to block President Donald Trump’s use of California National Guard troops and Marines within Los Angeles.

Judge Charles Breyer, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, instead said he will hold a hearing on California’s request Thursday before making a decision.

California sued Trump Monday, accusing him of illegally taking control of the state’s National Guard to suppress protests. The lawsuit calls Trump's move unprecedented, unlawful and unconstitutional.

  Democracy Docket


Fascism on the march is hard to stop

 Especially when you have a Supreme Court that favors fascists.


Posse Comitatus can be broken with the express will of Congress, or in order to defend an expressed provision of the Constitution. The Insurrection Act of 1807 can also trigger the suspension of the Posse Comitatus Act and allows the president to deploy the military domestically in cases of, well, insurrection, invasion, or rebellion. Should the South ever “rise again,” the president could deploy the military to stop them, again.

Technically, the current situation meets none of these criteria. Los Angeles is not in rebellion against the federal government. It’s not being invaded by Mexico. California Governor Gavin Newsom has not requested the assistance of the National Guard. And Trump has not (yet) invoked the Insurrection Act to support his use of military force. All this arguably puts him in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act.

But that doesn’t mean Trump won’t get away with it. The Posse Comitatus Act has enough holes to drive a tank through, and Trump is already using rhetoric designed to help him do just that.

For one thing, Posse Comitatus prevents the military from participating in law enforcement actions. Those actions are commonly thought to be things like collecting taxes, apprehending criminals, and, from the perspective of Southern white folks, enforcing the Voting Rights Act. Trump will argue that securing a Home Depot is not a “law enforcement” action. Ditto defending a government building or generally “protecting” the peace. That’s not a great argument, but it is a plausible one, as long as the National Guard isn’t being used to abduct immigrants.

[...]

We don’t see Marines deployed all the time, but Trump says they’re only providing “support” functions—as if they’re being sent in like the Army Corps of Engineers, but instead of supporting bridge reconstruction they’re supporting stomping on faces. I assume everything out of his mouth is a lie, but the reason he’s telling this one is that “support” functions probably don’t include “law enforcement” functions, and saying they’re just there for support will help Trump’s judges greenlight his military actions.

As for Trump’s failure to get Newsom’s go-ahead or invoke the Insurrection Act, Trump’s trying to get around those hurdles by invoking 10 USC 12406. This law allows the president to deploy the National Guard whenever there is a “danger” of rebellion or insurrection.

  The Nation
What I'm learning from Trump's time in office is that we have an urgent need to reform and shore up our laws.
Newsom, in addition to giving a speech, has sued the Trump administration for its use of force, saying that Trump has far exceeded his authority under this law. Newsom is certainly right. There is no credible argument that LA is “in danger” of rebellion or insurrection. And, even if there were, the law refers only to the National Guard; it says nothing about using active-duty Marines.

But the law has never been tested in court, which means the Supreme Court has never weighed in on how remote the “danger” of rebellion can be.

[...]

Everything I know about the current crop of monarchy aficionados running the Supreme Court tells me that Newsom’s lawsuit will fail [even if it succeeds in the lower courts]. [...] No precedent will be set that could allow a future president to deploy National Guard troops and US Marines to force Georgia to let Black people vote, same as it ever was.

[...]

The law will not force Trump to remove his jackboots from California. The law won’t even force him to use the right law (the Insurrection Act) to try to do this thing that he shouldn’t be able to do.




Trump goons shoot a woman with "less lethal" weapons

In LA:


In Austin:




George W Bush had his goons who shot "less lethal" munitions that actually killed a man, and seriously injured many more Iraq war protestors.  And who can forget Nixon's Kent State massacre where the munitions WERE lethal?  This isn't the first time our country has opened fire on its own citizens.  Let us hope this isn't the one that leads to a new civil war.

UPDATE 07:25 am:




UPDATE 09:52 am: