Part 2:
One main problem with Abramson's reading is he complains that "in the Russia chapter" Wolff isn't picking up on certain things that Abramson believes are damning points in the special prosecutor's case against Trump re Russian ties. It wasn't my understanding that proving Mueller's case was the point of the book.
Really, Seth?
Further:
Indeed, that's where Wolff is immersed and where he's writing from.
But, Abramson does have a point here:
Regarding Flynn:
Not having read the book myself, I can't be certain there isn't something more definite that Abramson objects to here, but with just what he's said in these two tweets, both things could be true. Trump could have wanted desperately to keep Flynn and yet been convinced by others that letting him go would help Trump's standing with the IC.
Here's Michael Wolff on his intentions in writing the book:
UPDATE 1/6 1:30pmHe added: “I spoke to people who spoke to the president on a daily, sometime minute-by-minute basis. In a sense there was one question on my mind when I began this book: what is it like to work with Donald Trump, how can you work with Donald Trump, and how do you feel having worked with Donald Trump?”
Asked how he gained such extraordinary access, Wolff said: “I certainly said whatever was necessary to get the story.”
Guardian
Here's Abramson himself saying Trump is guilty of computer crimes regarding the hacking:
No comments:
Post a Comment