Tuesday, June 26, 2018

In other Supreme Court news...

The question before the Court in this case was whether or not it could assume that, having gerrymandered the state by race three times in as many years, the Texas legislature made the interim maps permanent because they maintained the racially rigged districts. In other words, can we assume, based on the fact that many of us are not three years old, that the members of the Texas legislature were satisfied with the racial gerrymandering that helped many of them all get elected. Follow? Good, because it gets worse. Justice Samuel Alito is stepping up to the plate.

[...]

Alito seems to be saying that the 2013 decision by the Texas legislature to adopt as permanent the interim maps that had been proven to be racially gerrymandered was not discriminatory, possibly because there is no video of the legislature waving Confederate battle flags, drinking moonshine out of mason jars, and trying on white hoods to see if they go with gray suits.

  Charles P Pierce
Continue reading.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No comments: