Monday, October 2, 2023

Thomas recuses in a rare moment of integrity

And John Eastman is all out of appeals.
The Supreme Court on Monday denied an effort by lawyer John Eastman to appeal a ruling that found he may have acted criminally with the legal advice he gave former President Trump. It spurred a rare recusal from Justice Clarence Thomas, whose wife corresponded with the California attorney in the weeks ahead of Jan. 6.

[...]

The order says that Thomas “took no part in the consideration” of Eastman’s petition.

  The Hill
Previously, the Thomases have claimed they never speak about each other's "work", so why is he recusing now? And why isn't he resigning instead?
The ruling from U.S. District Judge David Carter greenlighted release of [Eastman's] records, allowing for the piercing of materials normally covered by attorney-client privilege — something that can be granted only when a judge determined legal advice was given in furtherance of a crime or to carry out fraud.

[...]

Eastman has since been charged by authorities in Georgia as part of a broader racketeering case, along with several charges relating to making false statements.

He’s also listed as a co-conspirator in the Justice Department’s election interference case, but he and five others have yet to face any charges in the matter.
Good luck, asshole. You should lose your license to practice law at the very least.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE 02:49 pm:


UPDATE 04:25 pm:  So... not so much integrity as necessity.


Why seems pretty clear to me now.

No comments: