Talk about "ignorant and arrogant." First of all, he CAN be guilty of obstruction of justice. He may be the chief law enforcement officer, but he doesn't make the laws, and he can't erase them. What an unbelievably fucking stupid thing to say. And secondly, what did the tweet admit then? Lying?John Dowd, President Trump's outside lawyer, outlined to me a new and highly controversial defense/theory in the Russia probe: A president cannot be guilty of obstruction of justice.
The "President cannot obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer under [the Constitution's Article II] and has every right to express his view of any case," Dowd claims.
Dowd says he drafted this weekend's Trump tweet that many thought strengthened the case for obstruction: The tweet suggested Trump knew Flynn had lied to the FBI when he was fired, raising new questions about the later firing of FBI Director James Comey.
Dowd: "The tweet did not admit obstruction. That is an ignorant and arrogant assertion."
Axios
Who could forget?Remember: The Articles of Impeachment against Nixon began by saying he "obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice."
Let's wait and see what Mueller hands them, okay?The one thing everyone agrees on is that the House of Representatives, with its impeachment power, alone decides what is cause for removal from office. For now, at least, the House is run by Republicans.
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment