Surely they weren't being suggestive or indecent in front of kids at a restaurant. But, that reminds me...DeSantis in the complaint filed Tuesday against R House, which hosts drag brunch events, alleges the restaurant violated state law and cites a 1947 state Supreme Court ruling that “men impersonating women” in a “suggestive and indecent” fashion constitutes a public nuisance.
The Hill
...what's Madison Cawthorn doing these days?
Again...surely their purpose was not lewdness.In hosting drag performances in the presence of young children, the restaurant has also violated a state disorderly conduct statute and a separate statute prohibiting the operation of a business “for the purpose of lewdness,” according to the complaint, a copy of which was obtained by Changing America.
OK, yeah, not appropriate.“The video shows what appears to be a transgender dancer leading a young girl by the hand and walking through Respondent’s dining area,” the complaint states. “The dancer’s buttocks were fully exposed, and his ‘g-string’-style bikini bottom was stuffed with dollar bills — a practice that is commonly known to occur at strip clubs. The dancer’s breasts — unmistakably female in appearance — were also fully exposed except for the nipple and areola, which were covered with adhesive ‘pasties.’”
“That is not the way you look out for our children,” DeSantis continued. “You do not expose them to things that are inappropriate.”
Like being shot at with automatic rifles while they're in school?
No comments:
Post a Comment