Friday, November 30, 2018

The best people

The OSC cited six staffers with violating the federal law in response to a complaint filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) in August.

The act bars federal employees from using their offices and resources for political purposes.

The office concluded that deputy press secretary Raj Shah, President Trump’s executive assistant Madeleine Westerhout, Vice President Pence’s press secretary Alyssa Farah, White House Deputy Director of Communications Jessica Ditto and two others violated the Hatch Act.

The six officials found in violation of the Hatch Act had tweeted Trump’s campaign slogan “Make America Great Again,” or “MAGA” for short, on their official Twitter accounts.

The OSC clarified in March that any reference to the slogan was a clear violation.

Those found to have violated it can be fined as much as $1,000 and face disciplinary actions such as suspension or termination.

  The Hill
Yes, but they won't be.
The OSC decided not to pursue disciplinary action against any of the officials since they deleted their posts once they became aware of the violation.

“They all have been advised that if in the future they engage in prohibited political activity while employed in a position covered by the Hatch Act, we will consider such activity to be a willful and knowing violation of the law, which could result in further action,” the OSC wrote in the ruling.
Kellyanne Conway and Sarah Sanders have violated the rule several times, and CREW has filed multiple complaints. This administration makes its own rules, and nobody holds them to account. Hopefully that will change in January.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No ruling on Comey's request to quash a subpoena

A district court judge on Friday postponed issuing a ruling on former FBI Director James Comey’s effort to quash a GOP-issued subpoena.

Judge Trevor McFadden gave the two sides the weekend to provide additional information about their arguments. The court will reconvene Monday at 10 a.m. for a ruling.

Comey on Thursday sought to quash the subpoena for closed-door testimony, arguing that House Republicans would seek to “peddle a distorted, partisan political narrative about the Clinton and Russia investigations through selective leaks” if he was not interviewed in public.

Comey’s attorneys Vincent Cohen and David Kelley argued in the motion that the subpoena “exceeds a proper legislative purpose, is issued in violation of House rules, and unduly prejudices and harasses the witness.”

[...]

Thomas Hungar, the general counsel for the House of Representatives, challenged the legitimacy of Comey’s legal efforts, arguing that it would be unprecedented for the courts to interfere with their efforts to subpoena witnesses.

Hungar says the federal government has “absolute” sovereign immunity in a civil suit and that even a court-issued stay would be viewed as interfering in congressional proceedings.

  The Hill
I don't get it. Is McFadden saying they didn't provide good arguments? Enough arguments? Is he looking for one side to give him better cover for a decision he wants to make? Was he just wanting to go home without having to think about it?

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:  Comey dropped the request to quash.
In a three-paragraph joint court filing Sunday, Comey’s lawyers [...] withdrew his request to a federal judge to quash the subpoena to testify before the House judiciary and oversight committees, writing, “Mr. Comey appreciates the Court’s attention to the above-captioned matter, but has now reached an acceptable accommodation with U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary for voluntary testimony.”

Lawyers for the House consented to Comey’s move to drop the case.

Comey agreed to sit for a voluntary interview on Friday under terms that include that “so long as the interview proceeds as a voluntary interview, an FBI representative will be present to advise concerning the disclosure of FBI information,” said his lawyer David N. Kelley.

  WaPo

Please measure Rudy for an orange jumpsuit





Frankly, I don't know what Giuliani is saying in either of those tweets.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

"Donald" doesn't appear to be appreciating this



Since we can't see him until that end bit, I don't know if his obvious displeasure is with Trudeau's comments about standing up for Canadians and the need to knock back the tariffs, or if he's miffed that the upstart has the nerve to address him as "Donald" in such a public way.  Check it out.  See what you think.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Jesus wept






The optics.  To be sure, this is a Mexican prouction, but it's in place because of the US policy of forcing the asylum seekers to wait on the Mexican side of the border while their cases are heard.

Story here

Can't wait for the 2018 version

This was so satisfying...



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Veterans Affairs reverses its decision on Forever GI Bill



They may be deep in debt or even dead by the time they get their money.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Voter fraud in North Carolina

The North Carolina State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement has no plans to certify Republican Mark Harris’s 905-vote victory over Democrat Dan McCready, according to an agenda of a board meeting scheduled for Friday morning.

The board is collecting sworn statements from voters in rural Bladen and Robeson counties, near the South Carolina border, who described people coming to their doors and urging them to hand over their absentee ballots, sometimes without filling them out. Others described receiving absentee ballots by mail that they had not requested. It is illegal to take someone else’s ballot and turn it in.

Investigators are also scrutinizing unusually high numbers of absentee ballots cast in Bladen County, in both the general election and the May 8 primary.

[...]

Another irregularity in both the primary and general elections is the high number of absentee ballots in some precincts that were requested but not turned in.

[...]

“I filled out two names on the ballot, Hakeem Brown for Sheriff and Vince Rozier for board of education,” Montgomery wrote in the affidavit. “She stated the others were not important. I gave her the ballot and she said she would finish it herself. I signed the ballot and she left. It was not sealed up at any time.”

[...]

The board also has the power to refer the matter for criminal investigation to state and federal prosecutors; it did so in 2016 after similar reports of irregularities in Bladen County.

[...]

The head of the state GOP, Dallas Woodhouse, has [accused] the board of a partisan campaign. The nine-member board, with four Democrats, four Republicans and one unaffiliated voter, agreed unanimously to delay certification.

[...]

Adding to the uncertainty is a political battle over control of the state board itself. State judges have thrown out two laws enacted by the GOP-controlled General Assembly intended to wrest control of the board from Gov. Roy Cooper (D); as a result, the current board is scheduled to dissolve early next week. That throws into doubt not only the fate of the fraud investigation in the 9th District, but the timing of certification of the Harris-McCready results.

[...]

Gerry Cohen, an election law expert who used to work for the state legislature, said he found one precinct in Bladen County in which the results seemed odd. In that precinct, called Bladenboro 2, 159 people voted by mail — 18 Democrats, 32 Republicans and 109 unaffiliated. Only four were African American.

  WaPo
How the heck - and why - do they know how many of the voters were African American?

How are we in the 21st century and still don't have a fair, standardized, fraud-resistant, modern voting system, a basic necessity for democratic governing?   It's almost as if our two-party stranglehold doesn't want free and fair elections.

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Whitaker con tale number ... I don't know

I'm almost getting tired of new stories of Whitaker's fraud, graft and chicanery . Certainly I've lost count.
New documents released by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission suggest that acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker misled the agency’s investigators as he was stepping into his role last year as Justice Department chief of staff.

After several attempts to reach Whitaker about the Miami company where he was on the advisory board, the FTC investigator emailed his colleagues to relay that he finally reached Whitaker, who was willing to cooperate and asserted that he “never emailed or wrote to consumers” in his consulting role.

That statement to James Evans of the FTC appears to be inaccurate.

[...]

The documents, produced Friday in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, contain internal correspondence among FTC investigators, who are frustrated at being unable to reach Whitaker at several points during 2017.

[...]

They also show how shocked the FTC investigators were in October 2017 when -- in the latter stages of their investigation -- Whitaker was suddenly named chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

“You’re not going to believe this,” Evans, who works for the agency’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, wrote on Oct. 24, 2017. “Matt Whitaker is now chief of staff to the Attorney General. Of the United States.”

  Bloomberg
Anybody who had been paying attention to Trump administration appointments would have easily believed it.

Appears to be inaccurate. ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Yes, thank you, I WOULD like to see McConnell go down with the Trumps



Ornstein is talking about this, I assume:
Joe Biden said [...] Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell stopped the Obama administration from speaking out about Russian interference in the 2016 campaign by refusing to sign on to a bipartisan statement of condemnation.

[...]

[A] former Obama White House official on Tuesday afternoon echoed Biden's frustration with the Senate majority leader, pointing to the way Obama's White House chief of staff Denis McDonough described the dispute in an op-ed last summer.

“Our administration's interest in making sure the response was bipartisan wasn't for the sake of being bipartisan. It was necessary because we needed the buy-in from state and local election administrators (many of whom were Republican partisans and/or skeptical of federal government),” the official argued in an email. “Unfortunately, as is well documented, Senator McConnell was unwilling to help — only making matters worse.”

  Politico



And, let's not forget this recent bit:



But, also, this:



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Manafort scheduling hearing


The Manafort scheduling conference is underway (I'm in the media room, hence the ability to tweet). Perhaps noting the large crowd in the courtroom, the judge notes that today is *not* the sentencing hearing, just scheduling: "In case anyone is confused, this it not it."

Special counsel prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explains what obligations the govt contends it is relieved of since Manafort breached his deal, incl. no longer agreeing to a reduction for accepting responsibility and fully laying out *all* of Manafort's conduct before/after the deal

Weissmann says they're still deciding whether to go to try to go to trial in DC on the charges that the government was prepared to dismiss as part of the plea deal

The judge asks Weissmann if the government plans to bring more charges, given the "vocabulary" in the status report about Manafort's conduct. Weissmann says they haven't decided yet

Manafort's lawyer Kevin Downing says there are a lot of unknowns at this point, he says they should be entitled to some discovery about whatever allegations the government is making about an agreement breach by Manafort

Weissmann says the government has had lengthy discussions with Manafort's lawyers and they're aware of what the government's allegations are against Manafort re: a breach of agreement

Both sides are in agreement that they want the judge to rule on whether Manafort breached his plea deal before the probation department does its presentence report

We have a second sentencing date for Paul Manafort: March 5 at 10am (the judge said if they need to reschedule that depending on how things are going, they can push it back)

I thought we might have had Mueller's promised enumeration of the charges he used to withdraw Manafort's plea deal before this hearing.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:



Mueller prosecutor Andrew Weissman said he was ready to go immediately with his filing of details on Manafort’s alleged breach... So the judge gave him a week to file it.

I may just keep posting this clip for a while


January 2017

"I have no dealings with Russia, I have no deals in Russia, I have no deals that could happen in Russia because we've stayed away."

Also, "We could make deals in Russia, I just don't want to because I think that would be a conflict."

And, "As a real-estate developer, I have very little debt."

1)  He hadn't been a real-estate developer for a long time; He simply rented out his name.
2)  We know that he owes Deutsche Bank something like $350M.  That's not likely the entire sum of his debt.

What do we want?

Indictments!

When do we want them?

Now!

Who's the boss?

Yesterday:


MOSCOW - The Kremlin regrets US President Donald Trump's decision to cancel a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Argentina and said Moscow is ready for contact with Trump, RIA news agency cited spokesman Dmitry Peskov as saying on Friday.

  Jerusalem Post


Today:



I don't think you can call it impromptu if you're announcing it before hand, but we get the message.  Trump has been summoned.

BTW: As far as I know, there's been no US official announcement of anything other than the attempt at cancellation. 

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thomas Farr update

He may never even get a final vote.
[Tim Scott, R-SC] will oppose Thomas Farr to be a District Court judge, effectively killing the nomination on the Senate floor. It's the second judge the Senate's lone African-American GOP senator has tanked this year over their views and actions on race.

In a statement on Thursday afternoon, Scott cited "lingering concerns about issues that could affect [Farr's] decision-making process as a federal judge" in opposing Farr. It was a reference to Farr's alleged connection to former Sen. Jesse Helms' intimidation campaigns against black voters.

[...]

After voting to advance Farr's nomination on Wednesday, Scott, Rubio and Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) began re-examining the nomination following the Washington Post's publication of a Justice Department memo detailing Farr's connection to Helms's campaigns. Helms’ campaign sent postcards targeting African-American voters that suggested they were not eligible to vote. Farr was a lawyer for the campaign at the time.

[...]

Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) also opposed the nomination, though it was part of his stand against all judicial nominees in order to force a vote on a bill to protect special counsel Robert Mueller. And all Democrats came out early against the nomination, as they were trying desperately to sway Scott and other squeamish Republicans to block Farr's lifetime appointment over his voting rights record.

[...]

Rubio and Collins had already endorsed Farr earlier in the week, but there were signs that his nomination was in jeopardy earlier Thursday, when the Senate delayed a final vote on the judge to next week. In addition to Scott, Murkowski and Collins said that they were undecided Thursday, even after Murkowski's office said she did not intend to block the nominee.

[...]

All three senators voted to move forward with the nomination Wednesday during a procedural vote. But Scott showed signs of hesitation, voting an hour after the scheduled time and sounding increasingly dour in his comments.

[...]

"The Senate does not have the votes to confirm Farr, and hopefully it never will," said Derrick Johnson, the president of the NAACP. "He should never be confirmed."

Donald Trump and Rod Rosenstein Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) office referred questions about whether the vote on Farr will still occur next week to the White House, which did not immediately comment.

  Politico
I'm guessing Mitch will not bring it to a vote if he knows he doesn't have enough to win.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Heebee jeebies

He's just arrived to Argentina for a world summit.  What's on his mind?







He's arrived to a world summit in Argentina, with "important meetings scheduled."   It's  now 6 AM.  What's on his mind?





What I remember about his talk on the campaign trail is that over and over he insisted he had no business involvement in Russia.  If it were so legal and so cool, why was he hiding the fact that he was trying to negotiate a deal?

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Thursday, November 29, 2018

And another thing



So impeach the son of a bitch.

Can't help wondering what the conversations have been like at the Conway household today.

Neal Katyal, former top lawyer in the Obama administration who went on to represent Democrat challenges to Trump’s travel ban, couldn’t hide his joy.

“I think it’s huge,” Katyal told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes. “The facts aren’t all in, but I think we very well could look back on this day, November 29th, 2018, as the beginning of the end of the Trump presidency.”

  RT


If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember your lies

Although Mr. Trump’s lawyers have long worried that the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, is trying to catch Mr. Trump in a lie, they said Mr. Cohen’s new account of the Trump Organization’s abortive hotel project in Moscow essentially matches what Mr. Trump himself stated in written answers delivered to prosecutors just nine days ago.

  NYT
Of course, in true Trump fashion, when asked about Cohen's plea deal this morning, Trump told reporters that Cohen is just a liar who was trying to get his sentence reduced. So does this mean that, contrary to what he said when they turned in the interrogatories to Mueller, Trump didn't really answer those questions himself? And perhaps had no idea what his attorneys put for responses? Or is that "essentially matches" phrase a tell?  Or was Trump just striking out with whatever suited his purpose in the moment, like he usually does?
Asked how he reconciled the seeming contradiction, Mr. Giuliani blamed Mr. Cohen.

“He has so many different versions of the same stories, so by definition he is a liar and we can’t trust him,” Mr. Giuliani said. “Given the fact that he’s a liar, I can’t tell you what he’s lying about.”
Yeah, not an answer, Rudy If Cohen lied, and Trump's answers coincide with what Cohen said, then Trump's answers are lies. If Trump's answers are the truth, and they coincide with what Cohen said, then Cohen is telling the truth. Which is it? I'm guessing they don't coincide, and Trump's answers are lies. Uh-oh.
“The president said there was a proposal, it was discussed with Cohen, there was a nonbinding letter of intent and it didn’t go beyond that,” said Rudolph W. Giuliani, one of Mr. Trump’s lawyers, who with others negotiated the president’s responses to Mr. Mueller’s questions for nearly a year. He said prosecutors did not raise certain details that Mr. Cohen now says he misled Congress about — including how long the hotel project stayed alive — and that the president did not volunteer those details.
First of all, we know we can't believe a word Giuliani says. And I have no idea that if Mueller asked about the project, he asked about how long the project stayed alive. Trump's lawyers may have obfuscated when asnwering the questions, but they would have had to come up with something, even if it were taking the Fifth, which would have been tantamount to an admission of guilt.
Mr. Giuliani refused to disclose Mr. Mueller’s precise questions to Mr. Trump about the deal or exactly how the president responded. He said only that Mr. Trump and the Trump Organization, his company, provided the prosecutors “with every document about this from the beginning,” adding, “That’s the only reason they know about it.”
Rudy is so full of shit. They know about it because both Cohen and business associate/federal snitch Felix Sater gave them details. And I doubt very much that Trump himself - and perhaps not even Trump Organization - was in possession of "every document about this." Cohen was Trump's lawyer at the time. Lawyers often retain pertinent documentation for their clients, along with notes and emails, drafts, and preliminary information that the client wouldn't necessarily have.
Mr. Cohen’s new account of the hotel deal will inevitably be compared not only to the president’s, but also to those of Donald Trump Jr., his eldest son, who testified repeatedly before congressional committees last year about that project and other matters. The complaint states that Mr. Cohen misled Congress about the fact that he had briefed Trump family members about the project. Although the family members were not named, a person familiar with the situation said Mr. Cohen discussed the deal with Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump.
And I'm just sorry Ivanka was never called in to Mueller's office. At least that we know of. Junior, of course, lied about it, with the understanding at the time that his lies matched Cohen's.
[P]eople close to the Trump family said that while emails indicate that both of them were aware of Mr. Cohen’s efforts to get it off the ground in 2015, their involvement appears to end in January 2016.
People close to the Trump family would say that, wouldn't they?

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.



Also, "We could make deals in Russia, I just don't want to because I think that would be a conflict."  "As a real-estate developer, I have very little debt."

1)  He's no longer a real-estate developer, because he simply rents out his name.
2)  We know that he owes Deutsche Bank something like $350M.  That's not likely the entire sum of his debt.

Oldie but goodie

It just keeps getting better - Part 2


MOSCOW - The Kremlin regrets US President Donald Trump's decision to cancel a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Argentina and said Moscow is ready for contact with Trump, RIA news agency cited spokesman Dmitry Peskov as saying on Friday.

  Jerusalem Post
Oh, snap!

UPDATE 11/30:



I don't think you can call it impromptu if you're announcing it before hand, but we get the message.  Trump has been summoned.

It just keeps getting better

President Donald Trump’s company planned to give a $50 million penthouse at Trump Tower Moscow to Russian President Vladimir Putin as the company negotiated the luxury real estate development during the 2016 campaign, according to four people, one of them the originator of the plan.

Two US law enforcement officials told BuzzFeed News that Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal lawyer at the time, discussed the idea with a representative of Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s press secretary.

[...]

The plan never went anywhere because the tower deal ultimately fizzled, and it is not clear whether Trump knew of the intention to give away the penthouse. But Cohen said in court documents that he regularly briefed Trump and his family on the Moscow negotiations.

  Buzzfeed
Dealing with Putin was a very big deal to Trump, who had hopes of him becoming Trump's "new best friend," according to his statements heading into the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow. Trump knew.
[Felix Sater, the architect of the plan,] told BuzzFeed News today that he and Cohen thought giving the Trump Tower’s most luxurious apartment, a $50 million penthouse, to Putin would entice other wealthy buyers to purchase their own. “In Russia, the oligarchs would bend over backwards to live in the same building as Vladimir Putin,” Sater told BuzzFeed News. “My idea was to give a $50 million penthouse to Putin and charge $250 million more for the rest of the units. All the oligarchs would line up to live in the same building as Putin.” A second source confirmed the plan.

Sater, a brash real estate promoter who pleaded guilty to racketeering in 1998 and became a longtime asset to US law enforcement and intelligence agencies, had worked with the Trump Organization on deals in the past and said he came up with the idea.

[...]

Two FBI agents with direct knowledge of the Trump Tower Moscow negotiations told BuzzFeed News earlier this year that Cohen was in frequent contact with foreign individuals about the real estate venture — and that some of these individuals had knowledge of or played a role in 2016 election meddling. The identity of those individuals remains unknown.

Developing a tower in Russia had long been a dream of the Trump Organization, which pursued a deal there for three decades. After Trump announced his candidacy in the summer of 2015, Sater saw an opportunity to revive the development.

“I figured, he’s in the news, his name is generating a lot of good press,” Sater told BuzzFeed News earlier this year. “A lot of Russians weren’t willing to pay a premium licensing fee to put Donald’s name on their building. Now maybe they would be.”

[...]

Sater lined up a Russian development company to build the project and said that VTB, a Russian financial institution that faced US sanctions at the time, would finance it. VTB officials have denied taking part in any negotiations about the project.
Two great points:

1) They were going to give Putin a $50 million dollar penthouse and sell other apartments for $250 million. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say they weren't giving Putin an apartment 1/5 as good as the others, but were instead gouging the others by hiking the price up five times the amount the apartments were worth. (Or even more if you consider Putin's apartment would likely be the best and therefore worth the most.)

And, 2) They were going to work with a financial institution that was under sanctions.

The sources for this article are not Cohen, but I just want to put it out here: for anyone who believes Trump that Cohen is lying, just remember, Cohen is the guy who made copious audiotapes of his conversations.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.


"One shoe dropping in a boot warehouse"

The president of the United States’ personal lawyer admitted to lying to Congress about the president’s business activities with a hostile foreign power, in order to support the president’s story. In any rational era, that would be earthshaking. Now it’s barely a blip. Over the past two years, we’ve become accustomed to headlines like “President’s Campaign Manager Convicted of Fraud” and “President’s Personal Lawyer Paid for Adult Actress’s Silence.” We’re numb to it all. But these are the sorts of developments that would, under normal circumstances, end a presidency.

They still might. Cohen admitted that he lied to Congress to support President Trump’s version of events. He notably did not claim that he did so at Trump’s request, or that Trump knew he would do it. But if Cohen’s telling the truth this time, then this conclusion, at least, is inescapable: The president, who has followed this drama obsessively, knew that his personal lawyer was lying to Congress about his business activities, and stood by while it happened.

And that’s not all. Cohen’s plea is only one shoe dropping in a boot warehouse. Who else lied to Congress about the pursuit of a hotel deal in Russia? Donald Trump Jr.? Did the president himself lie about it in his recent written answers to Mueller’s questions? (His lawyers claim that his answers matched Cohen’s.) Even if the pursuit of the hotel deal wasn’t criminal (and there’s no evidence that it was), everyone in Trump’s orbit who made statements about it—whether under oath or in interviews with the FBI—is in jeopardy today.

They’re not just in danger from Mueller, either. In just weeks, a Democratic majority will take over the House of Representatives. Control of committees will shift, and subpoenas will fly like arrows at Agincourt. Each hearing will present new terrible choices: Take the Fifth, tell uncomfortable truths, or lie and court perjury charges? Each subpoena is a new chance for frightened Trump associates to make new bad decisions like the ones that have felled Cohen and Manafort and Gates and Flynn and Papadopoulos.

I wouldn’t expect President Trump’s agitated tweets to stop anytime soon.

  Ken White @ The Atlantic
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

LOL Be best



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Deutsche Bank raid follow up

The investigation is the latest in a string of scandals and financial setbacks for the bank, which holds the mortgages on several of Trump’s most prized properties, including his Doral golf resort and his Washington, DC, luxury hotel. Speculation for months has swirled around the possibility that another company could take over the ailing bank—including rumors that the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, a Chinese state-owned bank, might be interested. This is significant because any entity that controls a large chunk of Trump’s debt holds a certain amount of leverage over him—an unprecedented situation in the history of the US presidency.

Trump has a long relationship with Deutsche Bank dating back to the early 2000s. At the time, most US banks refused to loan money to Trump following his string of bankruptcies and Atlantic City failures. But Deutsche Bank continued to let him borrow hundreds of millions of dollars—as of his inauguration, Trump owed the German bank as much as $364 million. Once a powerful player in international banking, Deutsche Bank has paid out billions in settlements to both US and European regulators for its role in the 2008 financial crisis and other scandals. When Trump took office, he refused to divest from his company, meaning he continues to owe the bank money—several of the loans are personally guaranteed by the president—even as the Department of Justice has opened new investigations into the bank’s activities.

In 2017, the bank paid regulators $670 million in fines for its involvement with “mirror trades” in Russia—a complicated scheme to allegedly help wealthy sanctioned Russians move currency out of the country. Deutsche Bank is also embroiled in a scandal involving Danske Bank, a Danish company, which allegedly was involved in laundering billions of dollars from Russia.

[...]

Thursday’s raid is not related to either of those scandals. In a statement, the bank confirmed it had been raided in connection with offshore transactions revealed in the Panama Papers, and said it is cooperating with the investigation.

  Mother Jones
I don't know what the rules are for finding evidence of another crime while searching documents you got under a specific warrant, but I don't think this means Trump is completely in the clear.
Even as it stands, Deutsche Bank’s ownership is rife with conflict of interest landmines for the president. Currently, Chinese financial giant HNA Group, which has sparred with American regulators, owns 8 percent of the German bank—though it is under pressure to sell that piece. American hedge fund Cerberus Capital—co-founded by Stephen Feinberg, a major Trump donor whom the president appointed to head his intelligence advisory board— owns another 3 percent.
I think we've just simply abandoned the issue of conflict of interest as it might apply to the Trump cabal.

Won't it be interesting if the Chinese government, with whom Trump is trying to win a trade war, would buy Deutsche and inherit Trump's personal debt?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

At least Trump has the best attorney possible



Okay, let me rephrase that: at least Trump has the best attorney he could get.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Assessment of the Moscow Project revelation

Trump withheld material information about his business interests in Russia from the American people at a critical time during the campaign.

As questions swirled around candidate Trump, his campaign associates and their potential connections to the Russian government, the Trump Organization concealed its outreach to the Kremlin on the Moscow Project. In July 2016, Trump told CBS News, “I have nothing to do with Russia. I don’t have any jobs in Russia. I’m all over the world but we’re not involved in Russia.” In January 2017, Trump said at his first major press conference as president-elect, “I have no dealings with Russia … I have no deals that could happen in Russia because we’ve stayed away.” He added, “We could make deals in Russia very easily if we wanted to, I just don’t want to because I think that would be a conflict.”

  Just Security
And today he says otherwise...



Trump's greatest enemy is his own mouth.
In addition to the enormous leverage Putin could hold over Trump by way of a carrot (the plan was to build the tallest building on the continent) and a stick (public disclosure of a secret deal), it is important to put these new revelations in context of other information about Russian election interference and ties to the Trump campaign.

First, Russian emigre and longtime Trump business associate, Felix Sater (“Individual 2” in the plea documents who negotiated the deal with Cohen), reportedly emailed Cohen on Nov. 3, 2015 to say, “I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected. … I know how to play it and we will get this done. Buddy our boy can become President of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putins [sic] team to buy in on this.” In short, the statement directly and explicitly connected the deal to Russian efforts to help Trump win the White House.

In moving the Moscow Project deal forward, Sater put Cohen directly in communication with a former member of Russian military intelligence (Sater also reportedly told Congress, “No such thing as a former Russian spy.”). And, according to the most in-depth investigative report on the Moscow deal, some of the very same Russians with whom Cohen was interacting on the Russia deal were also involved in the election interference operation.

[...]

We now know, thanks to Cohen’s plea, that the Moscow Project was discussed multiple times within the Trump Organization. This includes with Trump himself and his family members who worked there. The court documents read:
COHEN discussed the status and progress of the Moscow Project with Individual 1 on more than the three occasions COHEN claimed to the Committee, and he briefed family members of Individual 1 within the Company about the project.
Of course, it’s impossible to discern from this alone which family members were included in these discussions. Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka and Eric all worked for the Trump Organization at this time. Ivanka’s husband, Jared Kushner, never held a position at the Trump Organization, but it’s possible he was included in these discussions or was made aware of them as he was a senior adviser on Trump’s campaign. Of Trump’s three children who worked for him, only Donald Trump Jr. has testified before Congress on this matter. In his testimony to Congress, Trump Jr. downplayed his knowledge of the Moscow Project, saying he was “peripherally aware” that something was being pursued, that he knew “very little” about the deal Cohen was pursuing, and that he “wasn’t involved” in it.

[...]

However, he and Ivanka had been very involved in previous attempts to get a project in Moscow off the ground, and have traveled to Russia for it.

[...]

“It’s obviously significant that Trump and Cohen pursued a business deal with the Russian government well into his campaign, and lied about it, but it may be even more important why the deal stopped precisely when it did,” notes Just Security’s Julian Sanchez.

Here are the relevant dates to track: In early May, Cohen emailed Sater about a possible trip to Russia to discuss the Moscow Project. He told Sater that he could travel to Russia “before Cleveland,” a reference to the Republican National Convention taking place that summer in Ohio, and that Trump could make such a trip “once he becomes the nominee after the convention.” On May 6, 2016, Cohen confirmed with Sater that a June 16-19 trip to Russia would work for Cohen.

On June 9, Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort met with suspected Russian agents who promised to deliver “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. On that same day, Sater started sending Cohen “numerous messages,” about the upcoming Moscow trip “including forms for Cohen to complete.” Then, on June 14, the first public report is made of suspected Russian government hackers penetrating the computer network of the Democratic National Committee. That same day, Cohen met Sater in the lobby of Trump Tower to tell Sater that “he would not be traveling at that time.”

[...]

It is also worth noting that the court documents include the detail that Cohen “asked a senior campaign official about potential business travel to Russia.” This further connects Cohen’s business dealings with the Kremlin with Trump’s presidential campaign.

[...]

“These are all details that didn’t strictly need to be in the plea, and they prompt the obvious question: What changed between early May and June 14?” asks Sanchez. “Did something cause Trump to abruptly become concerned about being overtly tied to the Russian government, long before anyone was publicly talking about ‘collusion’? To suddenly abandon a potentially lucrative deal after pursuing it for months is a fairly dramatic step that might imply an uncannily prescient understanding of how serious a liability such public entanglement might become.”

Just Security’s Laura Rozen also identified the conspicuous timing of these events and, in particular, that Mueller chose to reference these specific dates: “I am struck by the specific timing Mueller included in the statement of information for Cohen canceling plans for the Russia trip…I expect Mueller’s inclusion of those dates is not random.”

[...]

Just Security’s Alex Whiting said: “The Cohen plea marks yet another instance of a person selected by Trump who committed federal crimes while working for him. The accumulation of criminality surrounding Trump is frankly staggering..”Speaking of which, did Cohen act alone in deciding to lie to Congress? How did he expect to get away with it unless he thought Trump and others in the Trump Organization would not tell the truth either? In other words, is this yet again, a pattern of lying that suggests an organized effort to mislead federal authorities, and, if so, who was involved in that potential criminal conspiracy?

[...]

“The Cohen plea and cooperation agreement is another reminder that it is difficult to assess the state of the Mueller investigation on a day to day basis. When the Manafort plea and cooperation agreement fell apart, and Corsi announced that he was rejecting a plea deal, it seemed to some that the Mueller investigation was perhaps stumbling. Now today’s Cohen news indicates that it is piling up more successful prosecutions. These ups and downs should remind us that the investigation is a complex one, appears to have many threads, is moving in a number of directions at once, and most importantly that there is a lot, a lot, that we do not yet know.”
Here's to eventually finding out.

Trump admission - follow up

President Trump’s recollection of discussions about building a Trump Tower in Moscow aligned with those of his longtime fixer Michael D. Cohen, the president’s lawyers said on Thursday after Mr. Cohen admitted in court that he had pursued the project as Mr. Trump secured the Republican nomination for president.

The president knew about the deal and discussed it with Mr. Cohen before it fell apart, Mr. Trump’s lawyers said. Mr. Trump detailed those conversations last week in written responses to investigators for the special counsel investigating Russia’s 2016 election interference, Robert S. Mueller III. Prosecutors had sought to question Mr. Trump for months and eventually agreed to accept written answers for some queries.

[...]

[Cohen] said that he discussed the deal with Mr. Trump several times and that Mr. Cohen continued to work on a potential deal until at least June 2016, court documents showed — months later than Mr. Cohen had told Congress that the deal fell apart.

Mr. Giuliani said that Mr. Mueller’s office did not ask the president about the timing of his discussions with Mr. Cohen about the project.

  NYT
Why anybody asks Giuliani for a comment on anything is beyond me.
Mr. Giuliani said that the president and the Trump Organization, the umbrella company for his family’s businesses, have been forthcoming with Mr. Mueller’s investigators for months about the deal. The company, he added, voluntarily provided investigators with documents related to the Moscow deal.
For months? Then why did Mueller wait until now to bring charges against Cohen for lying about it?
Though his lawyers said his statements to Mr. Mueller lined up with Mr. Cohen’s, the president attacked Mr. Cohen’s credibility on Thursday. The president called Mr. Cohen “weak” and accused him of lying to investigators to reduce his prison sentence.
That, too.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:


Indeed.

Keep digging, asshat



Oh, shit.  Talk about not very smart.  He's essentially admitting negotiating a business deal with Russia while campaigning.  I'm guessing he doesn't really know what "collusion" means.

So...did he or didn't he answer the interrogatory question about his Moscow Project truthfully?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:  Apparently, he did indeed cop to it.

The best people, Vol. MCXXIII

Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta is out of the running to be President Donald Trump’s attorney general following a Miami Herald report that he oversaw a sweetheart deal for a wealthy financier accused of raping teenage girls and running a sex-trafficking ring, according to two people close to the president.

The investigation, published Wednesday, was “not helpful” to Acosta, who was a federal prosecutor in Florida before coming to Washington, the two advisers said.

[...]

Acosta, then U.S. attorney cut a secret deal to allow billionaire Jeffrey Epstein to serve only 13 months in a county jail. [...] The agreement “essentially shut down an ongoing FBI probe” and granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators.” according to the story.

[...]

Acosta’s current job, which includes overseeing labor laws related to sex-trafficking, is not in jeopardy, several people told McClatchy.

  McClatchy
You can't make this shit up.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:

Trump's amazing, but not altogether surprising response to Cohen's plea



...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:



Oh, shit.  Talk about not very smart.  He's essentially admitting negotiating a business deal with Russia while campaigning.

Did he or didn't he answer the interrogatory question about his Moscow Project truthfully?

Further info re Cohen's new plea





UPDATE:

Periodically, Mueller puts Trump on notice



Oh, I hope.  Could have something - or everything - to do with the timing of hauling Cohen back up now.

I do suspect, however, that all his answers were caveated with the phrase, "to the best of my recollection."

Shit's goin' down fast now



I'm starting to get excited.  Also hoping for a boat load of indictments to be unsealed.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:  Appears Burke was charged with attempted extortion "for allegedly trying to use his powerful position on the City Council to solicit business for his private law firm."
At one point, when the fast-food company officials had not yet hired Burke’s firm to do property tax appeal work, the firm’s specialty, Burke and one of his ward employees agree to turn the screws on them regarding permits they need. “All right, I’ll play as hard ball as I can,” the unidentified ward employee says, according to the complaint.

[...]

Burke is also accused of pressuring the company to make a donation to the campaign of an unnamed politician. One company official gave $10,000 to the politician but that was eventually reduced to the legal limit of $5,600, according to the complaint.

[...]

Burke has faced scrutiny over the years for a variety of reasons, including the $100 million city workers’ compensation fund operated by the Finance Committee he heads. His law firm represents clients who do business with the city, forcing him to abstain from many votes.

He has survived federal investigations that threatened to undercut his power base, once even by blaming a dead man for ghost-payrolling irregularities on his committee payroll.

Burke’s law firm, Klafter & Burke, repeatedly has sought to reduce the property taxes that Trump Tower and other commercial properties have to pay.

He’s even been in the public spotlight for having taxpayer-funded bodyguards drive him to and from City Hall — and for how quickly city snowplows clear the pavement on his Southwest Side block.

  Chicago Suntimes
Maybe investigators found some documents that can be used in a lawsuit against the corrupt Trump Organization, although I don't know if that would be legally permissible. Anonymous leaks?

Oooooooh...didn't see that coming





I bet it's based on the Cohen revelation today that there was indeed a "Moscow Project" being negotiated during his campaign though.  Time better spent in a huddle with his attorneys than with Putin, under the circumstances.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

UPDATE:

Not just a cancellation of Putin meeting.



Circumstantial evidence that the Putin cancellation wasn't over Ukraine.

FURTHER UPDATE:


While it had been reported that Mr Trump planned on sitting down with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and South Korean President Moon Jae-in, those meetings will be "pull-asides". That means that the meetings between the international leaders will be informal, and potentially very brief.

  UK Independent


FURTHER UPDATE:



LOL.  Could be.

FURTHER UPDATE:  Yowsa!

The Mueller report by installments

Second: it's not primarily ABOUT Cohen. See, this is bouncing the rubble. It adds one more felony to those Cohen has already taken, with no real marginal effect. It will have an extremely negligible effect, IF ANY, on his sentence. So why bother?

Well, normally a federal prosecutor WOULDN'T bother with a plea that has no impact. But here, the impact is telling the story of the investigation as a whole, and promoting the case that the entire Trump Organization was lying about its degree of involvement with Russia.

Though Trump isn't named explicitly, he and his organization figure prominently and obviously in the charging document and plea. That's not something federal prosecutors do lightly. This strongly implies further action against someone.

Now, we don't have the written factual basis yet (the statement of supporting facts that Cohen agrees to). But reports of Cohen's plea suggest he admitted to these lies to help Trump and Trump's narrative, but notably NOT claiming that Trump knew he'd lie to Congress.

But the conclusion that the President of the United States knew that his personal counsel was repeatedly lying to the Congress of the United States about the President's business is inescapable under these circumstances.

It was awfully short-sighted of His Lardship to turn Michael Cohen out in the cold.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No collusion!






Maybe one day Mueller will fill us in.

In the meantime, we now have another chapter in the Mueller report in case it's never made public.

On message

We'll be hearing from Individual-1 on Twitter soon




Cohen pleads guilty to another charge

Shit is coming down now.
Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s former lawyer, who pleaded guilty in August to breaking campaign finance laws, made a surprise appearance in a Manhattan courtroom on Thursday morning to plead guilty to a new criminal charge.

[...]

The expected new guilty plea in Federal District Court marks the first time the office of the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, has charged Mr. Cohen. In exchange for pleading guilty and continuing to cooperate with Mr. Mueller, he may hope to receive a lighter sentence than he otherwise would.

The moves comes just two weeks before Mr. Cohen, 52, is scheduled to be sentenced for his earlier guilty plea. That case, which also included bank and tax crimes, was brought by federal prosecutors in Manhattan.

[...]

The Southern District said last month in a court filing that it was continuing to investigate “Michael Cohen and others.” While the filing did not identify other suspects, the prosecutors are expected to examine whether people in Mr. Trump’s circle were aware of Mr. Cohen’s criminal conduct.

In the Southern District case, Mr. Cohen already faced a potential prison sentence of about four to five years under the nonbinding federal sentencing guidelines, according to his plea agreement. It is unclear what additional time he could face with the new guilty plea.

  NYT
The new charge?





UPDATE: