Friday, February 2, 2018

Now it's the Pentagon's turn for being attacked

What will the Trump cabal leave behind? They've essentially destroyed the State Department, and have attacked both the DOJ and FBI. Now they're after the Pentagon.

Trump really wants a dictatorship. And the GOP are smoothing his way.
The White House is growing increasingly impatient with senior military officials at the Pentagon over the lack of a strategy for a preventative military strike against North Korea, The New York Times reported Friday.

  The Hill
It's not too hard to imagine what Pentagon officials are thinking: If you'd shut that shithead down who keeps tweeting insults at Kim, we'd have a better chance at creating a strategy.
National security adviser H.R. McMaster has reportedly pressed military leaders for a strategy due to his desire to keep all options on the table, but Pentagon officials worry that presenting the White House with a strategy will make a preventative strike more likely.
Perhaps they could refuse to put a military strike on the list of options.
Pentagon press secretary Dana White said that reports of a delay in presenting the information to McMaster were "false."

Defense Secretary James Mattis “regularly provides the president with a deep arsenal of military options," White told the Times.

Col. Patrick Ryder, press secretary to Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that Dunford "regularly provides his best military advice in a timely and responsive manner. Suggestions to the contrary are inaccurate."
So, if it's not true that His LardAsship isn't getting strategic advice from the Pentagon, what is McMaster playing at?
Tensions over North Korea policy led to the White House's decision not to nominate a senior Korea expert, Victor Cha, to be ambassador to South Korea this week after the Times reported Cha wrote a letter urging against a preventative military strike targeting North Korea.

Such a strike, Cha wrote in The Washington Post, would spiral “into a war that would likely kill tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of Americans.”

A White House official told the Post this week that it is now considering other candidates for the position, which has been unfilled since Trump took office last year.

“We have yet to nominate anyone for the post, but it is our intention to do so as soon as we can find the appropriate candidate,” the official told the newspaper.
The appropriate candidate is apparently one who'll advocate a "bloody nose" strike on North Korea.

Who knew we needed ambassadors?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No comments: