Thursday, February 17, 2022

Trump Organization getting buried in lawsuits

New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) on Wednesday criticized former President Trump's comments on his company's financial statements which she said contradict the former president's own lawyers' court filing. “It is not unusual for parties to a legal proceeding to disagree about the facts,” the attorney general’s office said in a letter filed in the state's court, according to NBC News. “But it is truly rare for a party to publicly disagree with statements submitted by his own attorneys in a signed pleading — let alone one day after the pleading was filed,” the letter added.

[...]

Ahead of Trump’s statement, a letter from his longtime accounting firm, Mazars, said it could no longer vouch for the financial statements it had prepared for the Trump Organization and ended its business relationship with the company.

[...]

Her comments on Wednesday were in reference to the former president's statement on Tuesday that it was a “sham investigation,” NBC reported.

“Remember when the attorney general and or District Attorney say they think my financial statements may be high, I don’t even include these branding numbers in them, which is far more than any discrepancy they may have,” Trump wrote, adding that investigations should be focused on Hillary Clinton and “murderers, drug dealers and rapists.”

  The Hill
WTF?

Also, we have reason to believe Trump is a rapist and at least a money launderer for drug dealers, and I wouldn't be surprised to find out he's involved in murders. So there's that.
The Trump Organization is being reinstated as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by the D.C. attorney general against former President Trump's 2017 Inaugural Committee.

[...]

A ruling by D.C. Superior Court Judge Yvonne Williams on Monday reversed an earlier decision by another judge to dismiss the case against the Trump Organization. The ruling focused on the District leaving out testimony regarding authority over the Trump Organization.

[...]

In November, a judge dropped part of a lawsuit against Trump's 2017 Inaugural Committee by ruling the nonprofit had not misused funds by spending $1 million on ballrooms and meeting spaces at Trump's D.C. hotel.

But the ruling did allow another part of the lawsuit to continue, which claimed the committee misused assets for the Trump family's personal gain. The committee, technically a nonprofit, is not allowed to privately benefit its leader.

  The Hill
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No comments: