I'd hardly call that second thing a bombshell. But, I guess since this is the age of Trump, it's the age of superlatives.Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein dropped two bombshells during a hotly-anticipated appearance before the Senate on Thursday, less than 24 hours after he announced the appointment of a special prosecutor in the FBI’s investigation into Russian election meddling.
According to lawmakers, Rosenstein confirmed that the bureau’s investigation into Russian interference in the election is no longer strictly a counterintelligence investigation — a kind of probe that does not normally result in charges — but also a criminal one.
He also said he was aware President Trump intended to fire Comey prior to penning a memo that the White House later used as its justification for the dismissal.
The Hill
"Little Marco" may get the last laugh.Across town [...] Trump was ripping the appointment of the special counsel as something that “hurts the country.”
“I believe it hurts the country terribly, because it shows we’re a divided, mixed-up, not-unified country,” Trump told news anchors at a luncheon at the White House.
[...]
"The president is entitled to his opinion, but we’re a nation of laws. ... The acting attorney general has the authority to appoint a special counsel and has done so,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) told reporters.
Can they not hold him in contempt?“[Rosenstein] declined to answer in any meaningful way questions about the process that lead to the decision to fire Jim Comey — the preparation of his memo, who told him [to write it],” [Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.)] said, adding that he was asked whether he was directed to produce the memo multiple times.
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, added that Rosenstein “did not answer specifics on virtually any question that was asked.”
How very generous. And that's a big "if".[S]enators — in part reassured by the selection of former FBI director Robert Mueller as a special prosecutor — signaled they were willing to give forgive Rosenstein's tight-lipped stance if it was meant to protect the FBI's investigation.
He showed up. He didn't answer any questions in any "meaningful way". But he showed up.Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, said, "there was some frustration” in the room.
“People wanted questions answered ...[but] it's not unreasonable position for him to take. People were respectful and thankful he showed up. He showed up. He didn’t have to.”
And keep his job.Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) told reporters that Rosenstein was concerned that any comments he made to senators in the closed-door briefing “would be made public to press, so therefore he felt limited in what he could say.”
Sounds like a waste of time.Rosenstein will cross the Capitol on Friday to hold an identical meeting with House lawmakers.
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment