Yeah. No comment.US President-elect Donald Trump has appointed his son-in-law Jared Kushner to serve as his senior adviser in the White House, raising concerns about conflict of interest and nepotism.
[...]
Kushner, a New York real estate businessman and investor, will join Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and Chief Strategist Steve Bannon in implementing Trump's domestic and foreign policies.
[...]
Before his involvement in politics, Kushner led his family's real estate company and was publisher of the New York Observer.
He will resign from both posts before entering the administration.
[...]
Kushner's lawyer said the appointment is based on legal judgment that anti-nepotism statute does not apply to the White House.
[...]
Conflict of interest laws also do not apply to the president of the United States, Schneider said.
alJazeera
Which is how/why the anti-nep law came into being.The appointment of relatives to White House posts is not unprecedented. Before the anti-nepotism law was passed, President John F. Kennedy appointed his brother Robert Kennedy to serve as the US attorney general.
On the other hand, I don't see what difference it makes if he's appointed Senior Adviser. He could advise without any appointment at all, and the article says he's not going to be paid for it, so it seems like another political optic more than anything.
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment