Friday, March 9, 2012

The Shame of the Brad Manning Defense Team

As I myself have said before:
[As William Blum points out] “It's unfortunate and disturbing that Bradley Manning's attorneys have chosen to consistently base his legal defense upon the premise that personal problems and shortcomings are what motivated the young man to turn over hundreds of thousands of classified government files to Wikileaks. They should not be presenting him that way any more than Bradley should be tried as a criminal or traitor. He should be hailed as a national hero.

[...]

“Here are Manning's own words from an online chat: 'If you had free reign over classified networks ... and you saw incredible things, awful things ... things that belonged in the public domain, and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC ... what would you do? ... God knows what happens now. Hopefully worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms. ... I want people to see the truth ... because without information, you cannot make informed decisions as a public.'

"Is the world to believe that these are the words of a disturbed and irrational person?

[...]

"If Manning had committed war crimes in Iraq instead of exposing them, he would be a free man today.”

[...]

But he is not a free man, of course. It is very likely that he will never be free again. He will spend the rest of his life in a federal prison for the unforgivable crime of telling the truth to people who don't want to hear it.

  Chris Floyd
...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No comments: