So now we wait for Trump's December 20 deadline to file response to Smith's request to skip Circuit Court deliberations and have the Supreme Court hear the immunity issue pronto.
UPDATE 12/14/2023:
Trial is currently set for March 4.
UPDATE 12/15/2023:
Nah, Elie. In this case, I want to hear that trial, and the country deserves it. There's so much information Jack Smith has that we haven't seen because he had the power to extract it from people who refused to testify to the January 6 Committee. Unless that trial happens, we are likely to never hear it. How many would bother to read Smith's report? All will be glued to a trial.Jack Smith has placed a bet designed to reveal whether Trump has the Supreme Court up his sleeve.
[...]
There’s every reason to believe that, should the court ever rule on the merits of Trump’s argument, Trump will lose, 7-2. But I don’t know if there are four votes to hear the case (and potentially rule against Trump) now, instead of allowing Trump to delay his reckoning in a manner that is most helpful to him politically
While we’re here, it simply must be said that one of the two justices Trump can certainly count on should recuse himself. Clarence Thomas’s wife, Ginni, actively supported the crimes Trump is being charged with. Thomas shouldn’t be allowed within a yacht’s length of this case..
[...]
With as many as five justices potentially in the Trump column, there’s always a chance that Smith could lose this gambit: The Supreme Court could preemptively rule that Trump is immune from any prosecution. But I would argue that even a ruling in favor of Trump would be better now than later. If the Supreme Court is going to bail Trump out, they might as well get it over with. Spare everybody the show of putting Trump through a trial.
The Nation
UPDATE 12/19/2023:
No comments:
Post a Comment