Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Did Fox News complain about his Armistice & Veterans Day behavior?

President Trump has begun telling advisers that he may visit troops in a combat zone for the first time in his presidency, as he has come under increasing scrutiny for his treatment of military affairs and failure to visit service members deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq.

Trump has so far declined to visit those combat regions, saying he does not want to associate himself with wars he views as failures, according to current and former advisers, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.

[...]

In meetings about a potential visit, he has described the missions in Iraq and Afghanistan as “a total shame,” according to the advisers. He also cited the long flights and potential security risks as reasons he has avoided combat-zone visits, they said.

[...]

Questioned last week about why he has not visited American troops deployed in overseas conflicts, Trump indicated during a Fox News interview that a trip was in the works.

“I think you will see that happen,” Trump said in the interview with Chris Wallace that aired Sunday. “There are things that are being planned. We don’t want to talk about it because of security reasons and everything else.”

[...]

Trump has spoken privately about his fears over risks to his own life, according to a former senior White House official, who has discussed the issue with the president and spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly about Trump’s concerns.

“He’s never been interested in going,” the official said of Trump visiting troops in a combat zone, citing conversations with the president. “He’s afraid of those situations. He’s afraid people want to kill him.”

  
Well, sure, but they want to kill him here and every other place he goes, too.
The history of presidents visiting American troops on active deployments dates back decades and gives presidents a sense of what is happening on the ground — while sending a message to troops that the government at home appreciates their personal sacrifices.

[...]

“The point is American servicemen and women are on the ground in these places,” [Eliot Cohen, a former George W. Bush administration official] said in an interview. “They are getting killed. I think any good leader would want to see something for themselves. And they would want to do something for the troops other than using them as props.”
The key word there is "good".
Plans for a visit by Trump aren’t firm, several advisers said, and the president has only begun saying in recent weeks that it may need to happen.
In the meantime, he will cause some other outrage so that people forget about the troops thing.
Trump’s advisers say his lack of a visit does not represent a lack of interest in or disrespect for the military.
You can't use that line on his refusal to visit cemeteries in France and just a few miles from the White House.

This could be a good tip for anyone running against him in 2020: make a couple of visits to the troops overseas during the campaign.

 ...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

No comments: