Of course, there is no telling what the end results of a trial might have been. I'm sure it would cost the taxpayers to take these cases to trial. But maybe the taxpayers need better lawyers who can win these kinds of cases and collect large penalties, rather than settling them and collecting only half of the settlement.Last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced a bill with Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) that aims to make government settlements with corporations more transparent and fair.
[...]
When banks and other corporations are accused of breaking the law, the government often settles cases instead of going to trial.
[...]
Warren's bill would discourage tax-deductible settlements by forcing federal agencies to explain why certain settlements are confidential, and to publicly disclose the terms of non-confidential agreements so that taxpayers can see how much settlement tax-deductibility is costing them.
Mother Jones
And, should the public care enough to do anything about it, here are some examples of tax write-offs in recent settlements:
Company | Violation | Settlement | Tax Write Off |
JPMorgan | selling dicy financial products | $13 billion | $4 billion |
BP | Gulf oil spill disaster | $20 billion | $10 billion |
HSBC | money laundering | $1.9 billion | $700 million |
Exxon | Alaska oil spill | $1.1 billion | $576 million |
Marsh & McLennan | bid-rigging | $850 million | $298 million |
No comments:
Post a Comment