Sarah calls it like it is

And the fact that Trump is not replacing scores of administrators and ambassadors should be stunningly obvious support of Kendzior's accusations.

I'm not sure if Sarah Kendzior knows how funny she is, but she routinely has her co-panelists cracking up. Today it was while they were discussing the notion that has been floated by many, including columnist Frank Bruni of the New York Times, that Donald Trump wasn't actually interested in winning the 2016 election.

[...]

"First off, this is Trump, and you have to imagine that in his head he's content to lose to a woman, and lose to a Clinton." You can hear the giggles in the background, but luckily Kendzior is not done and her colleagues have a chance to recover as she systematically lays out all of the reasons Trump had to want VERY BADLY to win the election. And that now that he's "won" — or more accurately, it seems, was installed — as president, she explains how he has proceeded exactly according to the M.O. of every other autocrat in the world by weakening our country's democracy and its institutions.

Honestly, I don't know how she fits as much information as she does into 60 seconds of airtime, but Kendzior either talks really fast, or has the breath control of Daveed Diggs and should audition for Hamilton.

  Crooks and Liars

Both. Kendzior always amazes me at how much information she stores in her head that she can spit out at automatic gunfire speed. So, in case she talks too fast for you to catch everything she's saying, this Crooks and Liars article transcribes it.